sec.14When application for statutory order of review concerning interim initial proceeding must be dismissed

### sec.14 When application for statutory order of review concerning interim initial proceeding must be dismissed Despite section 10 , but without limiting section 48 , if— an application under section 20 to 22 or 43 is made to the court in relation to a reviewable matter made or engaged in by a tribunal, authority or person in the course of a proceeding (the initial proceeding ) before the tribunal, authority or person (the decision-maker ); and review of the matter is available because of provision made by a law (including this Act) under which the applicant is entitled to seek a review by the court, another court, or another tribunal, authority or person, of any decision of the decision-maker at the end of the initial proceeding; and the court considers that it is desirable to dismiss the application in order to avoid interference with the due and orderly conduct of the initial proceeding because, in all the circumstances, the balance of convenience (including the interests of the applicant, another party or another person, the public interest and the consequences of delay in the initial proceeding) so requires; the court must dismiss the application if it is satisfied, having regard to the interests of justice, that it should do so. - (a) an application under section 20 to 22 or 43 is made to the court in relation to a reviewable matter made or engaged in by a tribunal, authority or person in the course of a proceeding (the initial proceeding ) before the tribunal, authority or person (the decision-maker ); and - (b) review of the matter is available because of provision made by a law (including this Act) under which the applicant is entitled to seek a review by the court, another court, or another tribunal, authority or person, of any decision of the decision-maker at the end of the initial proceeding; and - (c) the court considers that it is desirable to dismiss the application in order to avoid interference with the due and orderly conduct of the initial proceeding because, in all the circumstances, the balance of convenience (including the interests of the applicant, another party or another person, the public interest and the consequences of delay in the initial proceeding) so requires;