sec.249Effect of reviews on payout refusal decisions

### sec.249 Effect of reviews on payout refusal decisions If, following the review of a review decision by the commissioner, the commissioner sets aside the review decision— the payout refusal decision to which the review decision relates ceases to have effect; and this Act applies to the responsible licensed person in relation to the displayed win to which the payout refusal decision related as if the decision had not been made. If an involved licensed monitoring operator overrules a payout refusal decision— the decision ceases to have effect; and this Act applies to the responsible licensed person in relation to the displayed win to which the payout refusal decision related as if the decision had not been made. Nothing in sections 246 to 248 affects or prejudices any other right or remedy of an affected person in relation to a displayed win to which a payout refusal decision relates. In this section— responsible licensed person means— if the relevant gaming machine is not part of a multiple site linked jackpot arrangement for which a licensed monitoring operator has an approval for its operation under section 287 —the licensee of the licensed premises on which the gaming machine is installed; or if the relevant gaming machine is part of a multiple site linked jackpot arrangement for which a licensed monitoring operator has an approval for its operation under section 287 —the licensed monitoring operator who has the approval for the operation of the arrangement. s 249 ins 1999 No. 77 s 90 amd 2000 No. 51 s 64 ; 2012 No. 25 s 109 (1) (sec.249-ssec.1) If, following the review of a review decision by the commissioner, the commissioner sets aside the review decision— the payout refusal decision to which the review decision relates ceases to have effect; and this Act applies to the responsible licensed person in relation to the displayed win to which the payout refusal decision related as if the decision had not been made. (sec.249-ssec.2) If an involved licensed monitoring operator overrules a payout refusal decision— the decision ceases to have effect; and this Act applies to the responsible licensed person in relation to the displayed win to which the payout refusal decision related as if the decision had not been made. (sec.249-ssec.3) Nothing in sections 246 to 248 affects or prejudices any other right or remedy of an affected person in relation to a displayed win to which a payout refusal decision relates. (sec.249-ssec.4) In this section— responsible licensed person means— if the relevant gaming machine is not part of a multiple site linked jackpot arrangement for which a licensed monitoring operator has an approval for its operation under section 287 —the licensee of the licensed premises on which the gaming machine is installed; or if the relevant gaming machine is part of a multiple site linked jackpot arrangement for which a licensed monitoring operator has an approval for its operation under section 287 —the licensed monitoring operator who has the approval for the operation of the arrangement. - (a) the payout refusal decision to which the review decision relates ceases to have effect; and - (b) this Act applies to the responsible licensed person in relation to the displayed win to which the payout refusal decision related as if the decision had not been made. - (a) the decision ceases to have effect; and - (b) this Act applies to the responsible licensed person in relation to the displayed win to which the payout refusal decision related as if the decision had not been made. - (a) if the relevant gaming machine is not part of a multiple site linked jackpot arrangement for which a licensed monitoring operator has an approval for its operation under section 287 —the licensee of the licensed premises on which the gaming machine is installed; or - (b) if the relevant gaming machine is part of a multiple site linked jackpot arrangement for which a licensed monitoring operator has an approval for its operation under section 287 —the licensed monitoring operator who has the approval for the operation of the arrangement.