The Regulations contain specific technical requirements and exceptions that create practical compliance traps if overlooked. Below are concrete "gotchas" drawn from the Regulations’ wording.
Approved refund marking variants and who pays. Regulation 2D allows three alternative wordings for the approved refund marking. The note to regulation 2D(1)(c) states that the 10c refund is payable only by an operator of an approved collection depot. Practitioners should not assume that the presence of the marking alone obliges every downstream seller to make payment; the payment obligation rests with operators of approved collection depots. Also, regulation 13(1) takes a South Australian marking to be an approved marking until 30 June 2014; that transitional recognition no longer applies after that date, so older labelling might not comply post‑transitional period.
Exemptions by container construction and size. Regulation 2F contains detailed exemptions based on material and litre thresholds. For example, glass containers for wine or spiritous liquor are exempt (regulation 2F(a)). A beverage producer must check both the product type and container construction. A container of 1 litre of pure juice is exempt if the juice is "pure" as defined (regulation 2F(d)), which requires at least 90% fruit or vegetable juice; failure to meet that threshold will bring the container into the CDS.
Reverse vending payment conditionality. Regulation 2FA permits payment via redeemable voucher or by credit to a recognised account, but only if the machine’s collection approval authorises payment that way and subject to any conditions in the approval (regulation 2FA(1)-(3)). Reverse vending operators cannot unilaterally choose payment methods outside their collection approval. "Recognised account" is narrowly defined and can include retailer accounts that are withdrawable as cash, but that feature may create limits on consumer usability of credits (regulation 2FA(4)).
Sorting limitation number. Regulation 2FB prescribes the "prescribed number of material types" as nine. Entities that have designed sorting lines with more granular material separation must consolidate into no more than nine types where the Act requires such a limit. That may require process redesign, additional sorting steps before deposit to collection depots, or contractual arrangements with recyclers.
Retailer notice dimensions and electronic exception. Regulation 5(1)(a) prescribes a minimum printed size for the retailer notice, 95 mm by 150 mm. But regulation 5(2) exempts electronic notices from the size requirement. Retailers relying on electronic signage must ensure the notice is still displayed in a "prominent position at each place ... where the retailer makes a prohibited plastic bag available" (regulation 5(1)), and should not assume that merely having the notice on a website satisfies the in‑premises prominence requirement.
Infringement notice timing technicalities. Payment by electronic means is only effective when the amount is credited to the payee’s bank account (regulation 10(1)). Payment by cheque is only effective if the cheque clears on first presentation (regulation 10(2)). These timing rules can cause expiation failures where payments are made shortly before the 28‑day deadline but face banking delays or returned cheques. Advising clients to allow extra time for electronic credits and to use immediately cleared payment methods will reduce risk.
CEO withdrawal window. The CEO may withdraw an infringement notice only within 28 days after issue and before payment (regulation 11). If a person pays without checking whether a withdrawal is pending, they may lose the opportunity to have the notice withdrawn, though payment expiates the offence (regulation 10A).
Schedule references to Act provisions. The Schedule sets penalty units for specific Act provisions (for example, sections 13(4) and 14(2) mapped to two penalty units). The Schedule does not restate the substantive elements of those Act sections. Practitioners must check the Act to determine the conduct giving rise to the listed penalty units. Assuming the Schedule identifies the full scope of an offence without consulting the Act is a compliance pitfall.
Transitional markings expired. The transitional recognition of South Australian approved markings in regulation 13 expired on 30 June 2014; users who rely on older labels should confirm current labelling compliance against the present wording of regulation 2D.
No cases in the instrument. The Regulations do not cite decisions. Legal arguments about interpretation will therefore depend on courts’ interpretation of the Act and Regulations, none of which are summarised here.
These specific textual traps are the sorts of practical issues that cause noncompliance complaints or enforcement action, and they require precise, text‑based checks against the Regulations and the Act.