sec.66GRestriction on disclosure in proceedings

### sec.66G Restriction on disclosure in proceedings Evidence of the imposition of a monitoring device condition or the use of a monitoring device, and other evidence directly or indirectly derived from the imposition or use, is not admissible in any proceeding other than— a proceeding for a domestic violence offence; or a proceeding for a criminal offence that is not a domestic violence offence in which the court considers it is in the interests of justice to admit the evidence. Evidence of the use of a safety device, and other evidence directly or indirectly derived from the use, is not admissible in any proceeding other than a proceeding for a domestic violence offence. s 66G ins 2025 No. 18 s 15 exp 1 October 2027 (see s 66H) (sec.66G-ssec.1) Evidence of the imposition of a monitoring device condition or the use of a monitoring device, and other evidence directly or indirectly derived from the imposition or use, is not admissible in any proceeding other than— a proceeding for a domestic violence offence; or a proceeding for a criminal offence that is not a domestic violence offence in which the court considers it is in the interests of justice to admit the evidence. (sec.66G-ssec.2) Evidence of the use of a safety device, and other evidence directly or indirectly derived from the use, is not admissible in any proceeding other than a proceeding for a domestic violence offence. - (a) a proceeding for a domestic violence offence; or - (b) a proceeding for a criminal offence that is not a domestic violence offence in which the court considers it is in the interests of justice to admit the evidence.