QLDIn ForceAct
Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012
sec.37When court may make protection order
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.37
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012.
### sec.37 When court may make protection order
A court may make a protection order against a person (the respondent ) for the benefit of another person (the aggrieved ) if the court is satisfied that—
a relevant relationship exists between the aggrieved and the respondent; and
the respondent has committed domestic violence against the aggrieved; and
See the examples of the type of behaviour that constitutes domestic violence in sections 8 , 11 and 12 , which define the terms domestic violence , emotional or psychological abuse and economic abuse .
the protection order is necessary or desirable to protect the aggrieved from domestic violence.
In deciding whether a protection order is necessary or desirable to protect the aggrieved from domestic violence—
the court must consider—
the principles mentioned in section 4 ; and
if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has failed to comply with the order—the respondent’s failure to comply with the order; and
the respondent’s criminal history and domestic violence history filed in or given to the court under section 36A ; and
if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has complied with the order—the court may consider the respondent’s compliance with the order.
However, the court must not refuse to make a protection order merely because—
the respondent has complied with an intervention order or a diversion order previously made against the respondent; or
a police protection direction has been issued against the respondent and is still in force.
If an application for a protection order names more than 1 respondent, the court may make a domestic violence order or domestic violence orders naming 1, some or all of the respondents, as the court considers appropriate.
If the court decides to make a protection order against the respondent, the court must consider the appropriate period for which the order is to continue in force.
See section 97 for matters to be considered when deciding the period for which a protection order is to continue in force.
This section applies subject to section 41G .
s 37 amd 2016 No. 51 s 4 ; 2023 No. 1 s 36 ; 2024 No. 5 ss 27 , 38 ; 2025 No. 18 s 11
(sec.37-ssec.1) A court may make a protection order against a person (the respondent ) for the benefit of another person (the aggrieved ) if the court is satisfied that— a relevant relationship exists between the aggrieved and the respondent; and the respondent has committed domestic violence against the aggrieved; and See the examples of the type of behaviour that constitutes domestic violence in sections 8 , 11 and 12 , which define the terms domestic violence , emotional or psychological abuse and economic abuse . the protection order is necessary or desirable to protect the aggrieved from domestic violence.
(sec.37-ssec.2) In deciding whether a protection order is necessary or desirable to protect the aggrieved from domestic violence— the court must consider— the principles mentioned in section 4 ; and if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has failed to comply with the order—the respondent’s failure to comply with the order; and the respondent’s criminal history and domestic violence history filed in or given to the court under section 36A ; and if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has complied with the order—the court may consider the respondent’s compliance with the order.
(sec.37-ssec.3) However, the court must not refuse to make a protection order merely because— the respondent has complied with an intervention order or a diversion order previously made against the respondent; or a police protection direction has been issued against the respondent and is still in force.
(sec.37-ssec.4) If an application for a protection order names more than 1 respondent, the court may make a domestic violence order or domestic violence orders naming 1, some or all of the respondents, as the court considers appropriate.
(sec.37-ssec.5) If the court decides to make a protection order against the respondent, the court must consider the appropriate period for which the order is to continue in force. See section 97 for matters to be considered when deciding the period for which a protection order is to continue in force.
(sec.37-ssec.6) This section applies subject to section 41G .
- (a) a relevant relationship exists between the aggrieved and the respondent; and
- (b) the respondent has committed domestic violence against the aggrieved; and Note— See the examples of the type of behaviour that constitutes domestic violence in sections 8 , 11 and 12 , which define the terms domestic violence , emotional or psychological abuse and economic abuse .
- (c) the protection order is necessary or desirable to protect the aggrieved from domestic violence.
- (a) the court must consider— (i) the principles mentioned in section 4 ; and (ii) if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has failed to comply with the order—the respondent’s failure to comply with the order; and (iii) the respondent’s criminal history and domestic violence history filed in or given to the court under section 36A ; and
- (i) the principles mentioned in section 4 ; and
- (ii) if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has failed to comply with the order—the respondent’s failure to comply with the order; and
- (iii) the respondent’s criminal history and domestic violence history filed in or given to the court under section 36A ; and
- (b) if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has complied with the order—the court may consider the respondent’s compliance with the order.
- (i) the principles mentioned in section 4 ; and
- (ii) if an intervention order or a diversion order has previously been made against the respondent and the respondent has failed to comply with the order—the respondent’s failure to comply with the order; and
- (iii) the respondent’s criminal history and domestic violence history filed in or given to the court under section 36A ; and
- (a) the respondent has complied with an intervention order or a diversion order previously made against the respondent; or
- (b) a police protection direction has been issued against the respondent and is still in force.