sec.176DRecognised interstate order may be enforced

### sec.176D Recognised interstate order may be enforced A recognised interstate order that has been properly notified under the law of the State in which it was made— has the same effect as a local order; and may be enforced against a respondent as if it were a local order that had been properly notified under this Act. A recognised interstate order mentioned in subsection (1) includes a recognised interstate order as varied by a variation— done in a participating jurisdiction by a court under this part or a corresponding law; and of which the respondent has been properly notified under the law of the State in which the variation was done. A variation to a local order done in another jurisdiction may be enforced against a respondent as if the respondent had been properly notified of the variation under this Act if— the variation was done by a court under a corresponding law; and the respondent was properly notified of the variation under the law of the State in which the variation was done. A prohibition, restriction or condition imposed by a recognised interstate order— has the same meaning as it would have in the State in which the order was made; and may be enforced as if it were a prohibition, restriction or condition of a local order. s 176D ins 2016 No. 51 s 57 (sec.176D-ssec.1) A recognised interstate order that has been properly notified under the law of the State in which it was made— has the same effect as a local order; and may be enforced against a respondent as if it were a local order that had been properly notified under this Act. (sec.176D-ssec.2) A recognised interstate order mentioned in subsection (1) includes a recognised interstate order as varied by a variation— done in a participating jurisdiction by a court under this part or a corresponding law; and of which the respondent has been properly notified under the law of the State in which the variation was done. (sec.176D-ssec.3) A variation to a local order done in another jurisdiction may be enforced against a respondent as if the respondent had been properly notified of the variation under this Act if— the variation was done by a court under a corresponding law; and the respondent was properly notified of the variation under the law of the State in which the variation was done. (sec.176D-ssec.4) A prohibition, restriction or condition imposed by a recognised interstate order— has the same meaning as it would have in the State in which the order was made; and may be enforced as if it were a prohibition, restriction or condition of a local order. - (a) has the same effect as a local order; and - (b) may be enforced against a respondent as if it were a local order that had been properly notified under this Act. - (a) done in a participating jurisdiction by a court under this part or a corresponding law; and - (b) of which the respondent has been properly notified under the law of the State in which the variation was done. - (a) the variation was done by a court under a corresponding law; and - (b) the respondent was properly notified of the variation under the law of the State in which the variation was done. - (a) has the same meaning as it would have in the State in which the order was made; and - (b) may be enforced as if it were a prohibition, restriction or condition of a local order.