QLDIn ForceAct
Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002
sec.89FApplication for unexplained wealth order
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.89F
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002.
### sec.89F Application for unexplained wealth order
The State may apply to the Supreme Court for an order ( unexplained wealth order ) requiring a person to pay to the State an amount assessed by the court to be the value of the person’s unexplained wealth.
The State must give notice of the application to—
the person against whom the order is sought; and
anyone else who the commission, or if the application is made for the State by a police officer, the commissioner of the police service reasonably suspects may be affected by the order.
A person given notice under subsection (2) may appear at the hearing of the application.
The absence of a person required to be given notice of the application does not prevent the Supreme Court from making an unexplained wealth order.
s 89F ins 2013 No. 21 s 40
(sec.89F-ssec.1) The State may apply to the Supreme Court for an order ( unexplained wealth order ) requiring a person to pay to the State an amount assessed by the court to be the value of the person’s unexplained wealth.
(sec.89F-ssec.2) The State must give notice of the application to— the person against whom the order is sought; and anyone else who the commission, or if the application is made for the State by a police officer, the commissioner of the police service reasonably suspects may be affected by the order.
(sec.89F-ssec.3) A person given notice under subsection (2) may appear at the hearing of the application.
(sec.89F-ssec.4) The absence of a person required to be given notice of the application does not prevent the Supreme Court from making an unexplained wealth order.
- (a) the person against whom the order is sought; and
- (b) anyone else who the commission, or if the application is made for the State by a police officer, the commissioner of the police service reasonably suspects may be affected by the order.