ACTIn ForceAct
Crimes Act 1900
56Persistent sexual abuse of child or young person under
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 56
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Crimes Act 1900.
56 Persistent sexual abuse of child or young person under
special care
(a) is an adult; and
(b) engages in a relationship with a child, or a young person under
the special care of the adult, that involves more than 1 sexual
act.
Maximum penalty: imprisonment for 25 years.
(2) For subsection (1) (b)—
(a) a relationship includes repeated contact, interaction,
engagement or association, of a sexual nature or otherwise; and
(b) the relationship may have started, or started and ended, before
the amendment day; and
(c) 1 or more of the sexual acts may have occurred before the
amendment day; and
(d) a sexual offence that could be charged and proved under
section 66B (Course of conduct charge—child sexual offences)
can be 1 of the sexual acts.
(3) For a person to be convicted of an offence against subsection (1), the
trier of fact must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the
relationship existed.
Note For circumstances in which a majority verdict is a sufficient verdict in a
proceeding for an offence against s (1), see the Juries Act 1967, s 38.
(4) However, in a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1), there
is no requirement for—
(a) the prosecution to allege the particulars of a sexual act that
would be necessary if the act were charged as a separate offence;
or
(b) the trier of fact to be satisfied of the particulars of a sexual act
that it would need to be satisfied of if the act were charged as a
separate offence; or
(c) if the trier of fact is a jury—all the members of the jury to agree
on the same sexual acts involved in the relationship.
(5) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1)—
(a) the prosecution is required to allege the particulars of the period
of the relationship; and
(b) without limiting the Criminal Code, section 64 (2) (Extension of
offences if required geographical nexus exists), a geographical
nexus exists for this offence if—
(i) any part of the relationship was engaged in inside the ACT;
or
(ii) at least 1 of the sexual acts occurred inside the ACT.
(6) For an offence against this section that occurred partly or wholly
before 2 March 2018, the maximum penalty is the current maximum
penalty, however, for a relationship engaged in over the period
mentioned in table 56, column 2, the sentence imposed must not be
more than the penalty mentioned in column 3 for that period.
Table 56
item
period of relationship
penalty
1 wholly before
the lesser of—
(a) the current maximum penalty; and
(b) either—
(i) if 2 or more sexual acts alleged to
be involved in the relationship are
found to have occurred—the total
of the maximum penalties for
each offence constituted by the
sexual acts; or
(ii) in any other case—the highest
maximum penalty for the offences
constituted by the sexual acts
alleged to be involved in the
relationship
item
period of relationship
penalty
2 started before, on or after
and ended before
the lesser of—
(a) the current maximum penalty; and
(b) the 1991 maximum penalty
3 started on or after
and ended on or after
the current maximum penalty
4 started on or after
the current maximum penalty
Example—item 1, column 3, par (b) (i)
An offender is convicted of an offence against this section for a relationship that
occurred wholly before 24 December 1991. The jury agrees that 3 acts of indecency
occurred. The maximum penalty for committing an act of indecency at the time the
acts occurred is 5 years imprisonment. A court may impose a sentence for an
offence against this section of up to the total of the maximum penalty for the 3 acts
of indecency, ie 15 years imprisonment.
Example—item 1, column 3, par (b) (ii)
An offender is convicted of an offence against this section for a relationship that
occurred wholly before 24 December 1991. The sexual acts that were alleged to be
involved in the relationship included conduct that, if sufficiently particularised,
would have constituted an act of indecency in the third degree and 3 acts of
indecency without consent. The jury agrees that 2 sexual acts occurred but were not
unanimous about which ones. The maximum penalty for the sexual acts at the time
the acts occurred are 10 years and 5 years imprisonment respectively. A court may
impose a sentence for an offence against this section of up to the highest maximum
penalty for the alleged sexual acts, ie 10 years imprisonment.
(7) A person—
(a) may be charged on a single indictment with, and convicted of
and punished for, both—
(i) an offence against subsection (1); and
(ii) 1 or more sexual offences committed by the person against
the same child or young person under the special care of
the person during the alleged period of the relationship; but
(b) must not be required to serve the sentences for the offence
against subsection (1) and the sexual offences consecutively.
(8) Except as provided by subsection (7), a person cannot be convicted
of an offence—
(a) against subsection (1) if the person has already been convicted
or acquitted of an offence constituted by 1 or more of the sexual
acts alleged to be involved in the relationship; or
(b) constituted by a sexual act against a child or young person under
the special care of the person if the sexual act is alleged to have
been committed during the period for which the person has
already been convicted or acquitted of an offence against
subsection (1) in relation to the child or young person.
(9) For subsection (8), a person is taken not to have been convicted of an
offence if the conviction is quashed or set aside.
(10) A proceeding for a charge for an offence under this section must not
be started without the consent of the director of public prosecutions.
(11) The Criminal Code, chapter 2 (other than the applied provisions) does
1991 maximum penalty means the maximum penalty for this offence
applying on 24 December 1991.
Note This section was previously s 92EA which was inserted into this Act by
the Crimes (Amendment) Act (No 3) 1991 (A1991-90). See that Act for
the maximum penalty for this offence applying on 24 December 1991.
amendment day means the day the Royal Commission Criminal
Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2020, section 3 commenced.
child means a person who is under the age of 16 years.
current maximum penalty means the maximum penalty mentioned
in subsection (1).
sexual act—
(i) an act that constitutes an offence against this part; or
(ii) an act that constituted an offence against a sexual offence
provision of this Act previously in force (a historical
offence); or
(iii) an attempt to commit an act that constitutes or constituted
an offence against this part or a historical offence; or
(iv) an act that, if particulars of the time when or place where
the act took place were sufficiently particularised, would
constitute or have constituted an offence against this part
or a historical offence at the time the act occurred; but
(b) does not include an act referred to in—
(i) section 55 (3) (Sexual intercourse with young person) if the
person who committed the act establishes the matters
referred to in section 55 (5) that would be a defence if the
person had been charged with an offence against
section 55 (3); or
(ii) section 61 (3) (Act of indecency with young people) if the
person who committed the act establishes the matters
referred to in section 61 (5) that would be a defence if the
person had been charged with an offence against
section 61 (3).
special care—see section 55A (2).
young person means a person who is at least 16 years old, but not yet
an adult.