sec.129Restriction about records and access to surveillance warrant applications etc.

### sec.129 Restriction about records and access to surveillance warrant applications etc. This section applies to the following ( relevant proceeding )— an application to a Supreme Court judge for— a surveillance warrant; or the extension of a surveillance warrant; an order made under an application mentioned in paragraph (a) . Despite the Recording of Evidence Act 1962 , a transcript of a relevant proceeding must not be made. Also, no record of the application or of any order made in a relevant proceeding is to be available for search by any person, except by direction of a Supreme Court judge. A person must not publish a report of a relevant proceeding. Maximum penalty—85 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment. A person is not entitled to search information in the custody of a court in relation to a relevant proceeding, unless a Supreme Court judge otherwise orders in the interests of justice. Nothing in this section prevents a person who was present at a relevant proceeding from giving oral evidence to a court about things that happened at the proceeding. s 129 prev s 129 om 2005 No. 45 s 67 sch 3 pres s 129 (prev s 144) amd 2005 No. 45 s 67 sch 3 renum 2005 No. 45 s 67 sch 3 (sec.129-ssec.1) This section applies to the following ( relevant proceeding )— an application to a Supreme Court judge for— a surveillance warrant; or the extension of a surveillance warrant; an order made under an application mentioned in paragraph (a) . (sec.129-ssec.2) Despite the Recording of Evidence Act 1962 , a transcript of a relevant proceeding must not be made. (sec.129-ssec.3) Also, no record of the application or of any order made in a relevant proceeding is to be available for search by any person, except by direction of a Supreme Court judge. (sec.129-ssec.4) A person must not publish a report of a relevant proceeding. Maximum penalty—85 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment. (sec.129-ssec.5) A person is not entitled to search information in the custody of a court in relation to a relevant proceeding, unless a Supreme Court judge otherwise orders in the interests of justice. (sec.129-ssec.6) Nothing in this section prevents a person who was present at a relevant proceeding from giving oral evidence to a court about things that happened at the proceeding. - (a) an application to a Supreme Court judge for— (i) a surveillance warrant; or (ii) the extension of a surveillance warrant; - (i) a surveillance warrant; or - (ii) the extension of a surveillance warrant; - (b) an order made under an application mentioned in paragraph (a) . - (i) a surveillance warrant; or - (ii) the extension of a surveillance warrant;