QLDIn ForceAct
Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017
sec.132Authority of court for security
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.132
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017.
### sec.132 Authority of court for security
This section applies if the holder of a security for a contract—
is retaining the security under section 130 (2) (a) or 131 (2) (a) for a subcontractor’s charge; or
has paid an amount for the security into court under section 131 (2) (b) for a subcontractor’s charge.
The court may make the order it considers appropriate for enforcing the subcontractor’s charge over the security, including an order for realising the security.
However, the court may make an order for realising the security only if the holder of the security is no longer entitled, under any contract or other arrangement about the security, including under the security itself, to use the security—
for securing the performance of the contract; or
in some other way provided for in the contract.
Without limiting the orders the court may make under subsection (2) , the court may order the holder of the security to produce the security to the court.
A precondition or expiry provision for the security is of no effect to the extent that the provision purports to stop the realisation of a security under subsection (2) .
In this section—
expiry provision , for a security, means a provision of a contract or another arrangement about the security, including a provision of the security itself, under which the security stops, wholly or partly, having effect.
precondition provision , for a security, means a provision of a contract or another arrangement about the security, including a provision of the security itself, stating the circumstances that are to apply before the holder of the security may exercise an entitlement to use the security for securing the performance of a contract.
(sec.132-ssec.1) This section applies if the holder of a security for a contract— is retaining the security under section 130 (2) (a) or 131 (2) (a) for a subcontractor’s charge; or has paid an amount for the security into court under section 131 (2) (b) for a subcontractor’s charge.
(sec.132-ssec.2) The court may make the order it considers appropriate for enforcing the subcontractor’s charge over the security, including an order for realising the security.
(sec.132-ssec.3) However, the court may make an order for realising the security only if the holder of the security is no longer entitled, under any contract or other arrangement about the security, including under the security itself, to use the security— for securing the performance of the contract; or in some other way provided for in the contract.
(sec.132-ssec.4) Without limiting the orders the court may make under subsection (2) , the court may order the holder of the security to produce the security to the court.
(sec.132-ssec.5) A precondition or expiry provision for the security is of no effect to the extent that the provision purports to stop the realisation of a security under subsection (2) .
(sec.132-ssec.6) In this section— expiry provision , for a security, means a provision of a contract or another arrangement about the security, including a provision of the security itself, under which the security stops, wholly or partly, having effect. precondition provision , for a security, means a provision of a contract or another arrangement about the security, including a provision of the security itself, stating the circumstances that are to apply before the holder of the security may exercise an entitlement to use the security for securing the performance of a contract.
- (a) is retaining the security under section 130 (2) (a) or 131 (2) (a) for a subcontractor’s charge; or
- (b) has paid an amount for the security into court under section 131 (2) (b) for a subcontractor’s charge.
- (a) for securing the performance of the contract; or
- (b) in some other way provided for in the contract.