Consideration of Agreements and Draft Determinations
8 In considering whether it is appropriate to make the orders which the parties seek, I have had the benefit of an affidavit and report of Dr Peter Sutton filed 15 September 2004. I have also read an earlier report dated 29 June 1997 prepared by Dr Sutton which was before Drummond J when his Honour made the consent determination in respect of Part A of the claim area. Dr Sutton is an Australian Research Council Professorial Fellow of the School of Social Sciences, University of Adelaide and the Division of Anthropology, South Australian Museum. He is also an Honorary Research Fellow of the Institute of Archaeology, University College, London. Dr Sutton has carried out studies of the Wik and Wik Way native title claimant group and worked with the members of that group and their predecessors since 1976. He is a specialist in the area of anthropological and linguistic research relating to Australian Aboriginal people and Aboriginal societies and he is eminently qualified to express the professional expert opinions which he does in his affidavit.
9 This is a case where there is a rich body of documented material which has been brought into existence over very many years. It establishes the existence of organised Aboriginal occupation and possession of the determination area extending back beyond the imposition of British sovereignty. It also establishes the continuity of an identifiable society of Aboriginal peoples having a connection with the lands and waters of the determination area in accordance with traditional laws which they acknowledged and traditional customs which they observed. Additionally, the content of these records, in terms of recorded Aboriginal names and language, enables the linguistic links to be made between the present claimants, their predecessors and the society which existed in the determination area at the time of sovereignty and the relationship of clan groups to particular parts of the determination area. There is also a history of long term field work and academic study in and of the determination area and its peoples which reveals a consistency and continuity in the research findings. This body of material enables the Court to make the findings as to the state of affairs which existed in the determination area at the time of sovereignty with greater confidence and to draw the inferences of connection and continuity between the present claimants and the state of affairs which existed at that earlier time.
10 The historical records of European contact with the claim area commence in 1606 with Willem Jansz and the crew of the 'Duyfken' sailing down the west coast of Cape York Peninsula for about 350 kilometres and record the presence of, and contact with, Aboriginal peoples who inhabited the claim area. The record includes sightings and observations of Carstenz (1633), Matthew Flinders (1802), the Jardine brothers (1864), Pennefather (1880) and others leading up to the gold rushes in the mid 1870s.
11 In 1897 Archibald Meston, a Special Commissioner for Aborigines, visited the Embley River area and published an account of his visit and his contact with the various Aboriginal people he encountered in the area. The Weipa Mission was founded in 1898. The Aurukun Mission was established in 1904. In the same year, the Mitchell River Mission began at Trubanaman and in 1915 moved to Kowanyama. The Edward River Mission was commenced in 1938. The records kept by these missions, especially those kept by William and Geraldine MacKenzie at Aurukun from the 1920s to the 1960s, have enabled anthropologists to identify traditional clan estates within the claim area, to construct genealogies, and to demonstrate continuity of members of the claimant group to particular clan estates back to at least the early 1800s.
12 In his report Dr Sutton details the substantial anthropological work carried out in respect of the claim area and its peoples. The first active period of work was between 1927 and 1935. It included long term anthropological field work by McConnel based in Aurukun, Thomson also based in Aurukun and Sharp in the Mitchell River area and Edward River area. The second active period of anthropological study commenced in the 1960s. It has involved a considerable number of professional studies throughout the claim area and has been ongoing. The anthropological work has given rise to a substantial body of published and unpublished work spanning the period 1929 to 2000 which is referenced in Dr Sutton's reports. This work demonstrates that, despite European contact and the growth of the pastoral industry in the claim area, the predecessors of the claimant group and the members of the present claimant group continued their connection with their country and had cohesion as a social group with traditional laws and customs which they continued to acknowledge and observe. Indeed, it was the use of Aboriginal labour in the pastoral industry, which in part operated to keep together Aboriginal communities based on and around pastoral stations and to give to the young Aboriginal men and women the opportunity to travel over and learn about their country.
13 I accept the evidence and opinions contained in Dr Sutton's affidavit and in his two reports. I am satisfied that:
(a) native title exists in relation to the lands and waters identified as Part B of the applicants' claim and being the areas identified as the Exclusive Areas and the Non-Exclusive Areas in the two draft determinations agreed to by the parties ('the Exclusive Areas and the Non-Exclusive Areas');
(b) the members of the claimant group called the Wik and Wik Way Peoples are members of a society of peoples descended from the Aboriginal peoples who as a society at the time of sovereignty occupied the lands and waters identified as the Exclusive Areas and Non-Exclusive Areas in accordance with traditional laws and customs acknowledged and observed by them;
(c) the laws and customs acknowledged and observed by the society at sovereignty are continued to be acknowledged and observed by the members of the claimant group and have been acknowledged and observed by their predecessors from the time of sovereignty to the present time;
(d) the members of the claimant group and their predecessors through their continued acknowledgement and observance of the traditional laws and customs which existed at the time of sovereignty, have maintained since that time a connection to the Exclusive Areas and the Non-Exclusive Areas;
(e) the native title rights and interests in the Exclusive Areas and the Non-Exclusive Areas are held by the persons who are or are entitled to be or become members of the claimant group called the Wik and Wik Way Peoples;
(f) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the Exclusive Areas are as set out in pars 3, 4 and 5 of the agreed draft determination in respect of the Exclusive Areas; and
(g) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the Non-Exclusive Areas are as set out in pars 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the agreed draft determination in respect of the Non-Exclusive Areas.
14 I am also satisfied on the materials that there are other interests in and in relation to the Exclusive Areas and the Non-Exclusive Areas. Those interests and their relationship with the native title interests are set out in pars 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the agreed draft determination in respect of the Exclusive Areas and pars 7, 8 and 9 of the agreed draft determination in respect of the Non-Exclusive Areas.
Orders and Determinations
15 The proposed Orders, which are consistent with the terms agreed by the parties, recognise that the Wik and Wik Way Peoples as the common law holders of the native title are entitled to possess, occupy, use and enjoy the land and waters of the Exclusive Areas and to enjoy the native title rights and interests in the Non-Exclusive Areas, in accordance with their traditional laws and customs. The proposed Orders also recognise the other interests in the lands and waters in the determination area and the relationship of those interests with the native title interests. The proposed Order contains the elements required by s 94A and s 225 of the NTA.
16 I am satisfied that it is within the power of the Court to make the Orders sought and that these Orders can appropriately be made to give effect to the parties' agreement without a full hearing of the applicants' claim. I therefore make the Orders and determinations attached as Schedules A and B to these reasons.
I certify that the preceding sixteen (16) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Cooper.