Problems with the Form of Summons Submitted by the Appellant
18It appears that the appellant lodged a form of summons but no application for a summons to be issued. This would not necessarily have been a problem if the summons provided had been in an appropriate form for service. Unfortunately it was not in a number of respects. Before considering the problems in the form of summons proposed it is worthwhile pausing to observe that the requirement for a party to file an application for a summons to be issued is not a useless formality. It is designed to ensure that parties are assisted to prepare summonses correctly and that the documents required to be produced are "apparently relevant" to the issues in the proceedings so that, to use a more legalistic expression, the summons will have a "legitimate forensic purpose" - see for example Attorney-General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 at 681. The problems with the summons the appellant has drafted are as set out in the following paragraphs.
19First, the draft form of summons did not identify correctly the person who was ordered to comply with the summons, in accordance with paragraph 15(b) of Procedural Direction 2 quoted above. The draft summons is addressed to "GMH - Holden" which is likely to be a corporation or a name under which the corporation trades. The relevant corporation should be correctly identified by its full name including "Pty Ltd" or "Limited" as appropriate. In addition, Procedural Direction 2 requires a summons for the purpose of having a corporation produce documents to be addressed to the corporation, properly identified, "by its proper officer". The basis for this requirement was explained by the High Court in Rochfort v Trade Practices Commission (1982) 153 CLR 134 at 146.
20This is not a mere technicality. Like a subpoena issued by a Court, a summons is a formal order of the Tribunal. If a person fails to comply with a summons without lawful excuse, that person may be liable to punishment, or to be otherwise dealt with, under the enforcement provisions found in Part 5, ss 71 to 78, of the Act. As a result it is necessary for a summons to identify with clarity and precision the person who is required to comply with the summons.
21Secondly, the address provided is a post office box. Generally, a document can be served on a corporation by any of the means identified in s 109X of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and this is usually by:
(1)leaving the document at or posting it to the registered office of the corporation; or
(2)delivering the document personally to a director of the corporation who resides in Australia,
(see s 109X(1)(a) and (b) and paragraph 21(d)(i) and (ii) of Procedural Direction 2 of the Tribunal.) A post office box is most unlikely to be the registered office of a corporation.
22Thirdly, Part B of the draft form of summons, does not actually identify any documents which are to be produced. Rather what is set out in the relevant portion is a series of 9 questions as follows:
1. Indicate the numbers of computers in a 2012 LX Holden Colorado Crew, 2.8L, 4x4, 6 speed, automatic... GMH - SRN 136839521 VIN - MMU148DH605592.
2. a) Indicate if and how (the type of network) these computers are linked to each (daisy chained/hub).
b) Does GMH license access to this operating system to other non GMH organisations - Could Cequent/Hayman Reese's Electronic Control Unit duplicate/gain access to Colorado's computer system without causing errors?
3. Indicate the function/s and/or operational parameters of each computer without the SPS software installed.
4. Indicate the extent (quantitative and qualitative) that these operational parameters are changed when the SPS software is installed and activated while towing a 3.49 tonne 5th wheel caravan.
5. a) Would towing this 3.49 tonne caravan over a sandy (extra slippage) and slightly corrugated road cause the Automatic Braking System ABS warning to come on if this SPS software was not installed? Would this be a breaking safety issue?
b) Would this warning come on if the SPS software was installed and activated?
6. a) Would towing this 3.49 tonne caravan over a sandy (extra drag) and slightly corrugated road (Diamantina Development Rod) cause the Electronic Stability Control ESC warning to come on if this SPS software was not installed? Would this contribute to vehicle instability?
b) Would this warning come on if the SPS software was installed and activated?
7. a) Would towing the above mentioned caravan over the above mentioned road while driving in 4WD (possible labouring in higher gears - TCM) at 80 kph or less cause other warning lights such as 4WD service warning, cruise control, etc, if this SPS software was not installed? Would cause undue wear on the Colorado's hydraulics/gears?
b) Would this/these warnings come on if the SPS software was installed and activated?
8. a) Would towing the above mentioned caravan over the above mentioned road have caused an engine service warning to come on if the engine temperature was below half way and the air temp was below 22C (9:30am), that oil and other fluids were satisfactory, no unusual noises or vibrations while stationary or moving?
(b) If there was an engine issue like a crake in the air inlet manifold (see Emerald GMH) would it have shown up first as an engine service warning and not an electronic stability control ESC warning?
9. If the Colorado (with GMH trailer harness and software installed) is started up without being connected to may caravan ... is then connected without turning off the vehicle and then driving off - is the SPS software/computer activated for the towing mode? That is does the Colorado have to start up with the caravan electrically connected in order to get the benefits of GMH SPS software?
23These questions are, in effect, what Courts would call "interrogatories". Interrogatories are questions that a party may ask of another party before the hearing. The Tribunal has no formal procedure of this kind. Furthermore, the questions in the present case are directed to a third person who is not a party to the proceedings. The power to issue summonses under s 48 is limited to summonses requiring the person to whom it is addressed:
(1)to attend and give evidence, or
(2)to attend and produce documents or other things, or
(3)both to attend and give evidence and to produce documents or other things.
It does not extend to a power to require a third party to answer written questions such as those quoted above.
24One way for the appellant to overcome this problem is for the summons to require production of documents that contain or are likely to contain the information he is seeking.
25Fourthly, if the summons is to be served outside New South Wales and in Victoria as the address given by the appellant suggests, leave to do so is required under s 57 of the Service and Execution of Process Act. The appellant has not sought this leave. In addition, the summons must be accompanied by the designated form under that Act (Form 5). The draft form of summons provided by the appellant does not do so. Form 5 is provided as part of the form of summons to give evidence for service interstate available at the registry and on the Tribunal's website (for example at http://www.ncat.nsw.gov.au/ncat/administrative_equal_opp/aed_forms.html ).