Consideration
13 The Court is satisfied that the variation should be made.
14 Regarding the requirements for the making of an application under s 13(1)(b) of the Native Title Act, the Court is satisfied that Tarlka Matuwa Piarku is a registered native title body corporate and able to make the application pursuant to s 61(1) of the Native Title Act. The determination sought to be varied is an approved determination of native title, as a determination was made by the Court on 29 July 2013 in relation to an area for which there was no approved determination of native title.
15 The Court is satisfied, pursuant to s 13(5)(b) of the Native Title Act, that an event has taken place since the determination was made that has caused the determination no longer to be correct; namely, the delivery of the High Court judgment in Western Australia v Brown. Additionally, it is in the interests of justice to vary the approved determination of native title, the reason being that at the time the determination was made the parties agreed that an outcome of Western Australia v Brown may be that a variation application would need to be made to address the issue of pastoral improvements. The possibility of the application was contemplated at the time the determination was made, as reflected in the Minute of Proposed Consent Determination of Native Title filed on 5 July 2013 in support of the determination, and also noted in WF (Deceased) on behalf of the Wiluna People, and this formed part of the agreement reached for the determination made 29 July 2013.
16 As the Court is satisfied that the grounds for variation are met pursuant to s 13(5)(b) of the Native Title Act, it is unnecessary to review the grounds for the making of the determination on 29 July 2013 pursuant to s 87 and s 87A of the Native Title Act, as the result of the variation will not remake the determination. Rather the result of the variation is that the varied determination will replace the determination as the approved determination of native title with the only change to the determination being the inclusion of areas of pastoral improvements as areas where native title exists. Nothing further will be varied in the determination nor the agreement reached between the parties for the determination on 29 July 2013.
CONCLUSION
17 In the circumstances, the Court will make the orders in the terms sought by the parties to vary the approved determination of native title pursuant to s 13(5) of the Native Title Act. The effect of making the orders is that the varied determination is an approved determination of native title that replaces the determination made on 29 July 2013.
I certify that the preceding seventeen (17) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Barker.