Mouda on behalf of the Joombarn-Buru Native Title Claimants v State of Western Australia

SCHEDULE 3 EXCLUSIVE NATIVE TITLE AREAS Areas where native title comprises the rights set out in paragraph 5 The following land and waters (generally shown as green on the map at Schedule 2): Section 47B UCL Area in the southern portion of the determined area to the west of the Yeeda pastoral lease N050691

SCHEDULE 4 NON - EXCLUSIVE NATIVE TITLE AREAS Areas where native title comprises the rights set out in paragraph 6 The following land and waters (generally shown as orange on the map at Schedule 2): (1) Pastoral Leases: Lease number Location N 050161 Mt Jowlaenga Dampier Location 265 on DP29347

(2) Reserves Reserve number/purpose Location Reserve 9697 for the purpose of Kimberley De Grey Stock Route South-eastern tip of the determined area

(3) Road Great Northern Highway That portion previously subject to Reserve 9697

SCHEDULE 5 AREAS WHERE NATIVE TITLE DOES NOT EXIST (1) Public Works The areas the subject of the following works: (a) Roads: Road Number Description 222 Great Northern Highway as gazetted on 17 September 1885 and shown on CPP 507016 and CPP506791

(b) Any other public works as that expression is defined in the Native Title Act and the Titles (Validation) and Native Title (Effect of Past Acts) Act 1995 (WA) and to which s 12J of the Titles (Validation) and Native Title (Effect of Past Acts) Act 1995 (WA) or s 23C(2) of the Native Title Act applies, within the external boundary of the Determination Area including the land and waters defined in s 251D of the Native Title Act. SCHEDULE 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIVE TITLE HOLDERS (1) The Native Title Holders are those Aboriginal people who are: (a) listed in paragraph [2] and their descendants; or (b) recognised by the descendants of the people listed in paragraph [2] as having traditional rights and interests in the area under traditional law and custom. (2) The people referred to in paragraph 1 are those Aboriginal persons who are the descendants of: (a) Djanbigan Dangan, father of Otto Gili (Kelly); (b) Annie Murrjal; (c) Blanki; (d) Diima; (e) Garlmarr; (f) Gurupirin; (g) Nani; (h) Jinurrup; (i) Lucy Muninga; (j) Brumby Waddadul; (k) Minybal Esther and her brother Gumbil; (l) Jidnyambala; (m) Nobel; (n) Tommy Numarid; (o) Narrijit (Leonie) Peters and Undi (Andrew) Peters; (p) Bulu; or (q) Charlie Mangurl SCHEDULE 7 OTHER INTERESTS (1) Pastoral Leases Lease Number Location N 050161 Mt Jowlaenga Dampier Location 265 on DP29347

NOTE: The rights and obligations of the pastoralist pursuant to the pastoral lease referred in paragraph [1] of Schedule 7 above includes any rights and obligations of the pastoralist pursuant to legislation from time to time applicable to the pastoral lease in relation to the management of the pasture and vegetation resources, livestock and soils within the boundaries of the pastoral leases in order to manage stock and for the management, conservation and regeneration of pasture for permitted uses. This note is not intended to create any additional rights beyond those already held by the pastoralist in connection with the pastoral lease. (2) Reserves The following reserves: Reserve Number/Purpose Location Reserve 9697 for the purpose of Kimberley De Grey Stock Route South-eastern tip of the determined area

(3) Existing Interests under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) Tenement ID Tenement Type Date of grant E 04/2083 Exploration Licence 5 September 2011 E 04/2084 Exploration Licence 22 March 2013 E 04/2171 Exploration Licence 21 February 2013 E 04/2509 Exploration Licence 8 August 2018 M 04/311 Mining Lease 12 December 1995 M 04/313 Mining Lease 22 January 1996 M 04/357 Mining Lease 26 May 2000 M 04/454 Mining Lease 17 June 2013 M 04/459 Mining Lease 25 September 2018 L 04/81 Miscellaneous Licence 6 May 2016 L 04/82 Miscellaneous Licence 26 June 2018 L 04/84 Miscellaneous Licence 23 April 2015 L 04/85 Miscellaneous Licence 23 April 2015 L 04/86 Miscellaneous Licence 23 April 2015 L 04/92 Miscellaneous Licence 22 July 2015 L 04/93 Miscellaneous Licence 22 July 2015

(4) Existing Interests under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA) Tenement ID Tenement Type Date of grant EP 428 R1 Exploration Permit 31 July 2014 EP 436 R1 Exploration Permit 31 July 2014

(5) Roads The interests of persons who have the care, control and management of the following roads and the interests of persons entitled to use those roads, being roads to which the non-extinguishment principle applies: Description Great Northern Highway (portion formerly subject to Reserve 9697)

(6) Other Rights and Interests (a) Rights and interests, including licences and permits, granted by the Crown in right of the Commonwealth or the State pursuant to statute or otherwise in the exercise of its executive power and under any regulations made pursuant to such legislation. (b) Rights or interests held by reason of the force and operation of the laws of the State or of the Commonwealth including the force and operation of the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA). (c) Rights and interests of members of the public arising under the common law including but not limited to: (i) the public right to fish and navigate in tidal waters (if any) in the Determination Area; and (ii) the right of any person to use any road in the Determination Area (subject to the laws of the State) over which, as at the date of this Determination, members of the public have a right of access under common law. (d) The right to access land by an employee or agent or instrumentality of: (i) the State; (ii) the Commonwealth; or (iii) any local Government authority; as required in the performance of his or her statutory or common law duties where such access would be permitted to private land. (e) So far as confirmed pursuant to s 14 of the Titles (Validation) and Native Title (Effect of Past Acts) Act 1995 (WA) as at the date of this determination, any existing public access to and enjoyment of: (i) waterways; (ii) the beds and banks or foreshores of waterways; (iii) stock routes; or (iv) areas that were public places at the end of 31 December 1993. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

MCKERRACHER J: 1 This proceeding was commenced by the filing of an application under s 61 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for a determination of native title. The application is known as the Joombarn-buru Application. The parties to the proceeding have reached agreement on the terms of a determination and a form of orders that are appropriate to be made in relation to the land and waters covered by the Joombarn-buru Application (Determination Area). Submissions have been filed jointly by the Applicant and the First Respondent, the State, in support of the Court making a consent determination of native title under s 87 and s 94A of the Native Title Act.

KEY DOCUMENTS 2 The State Solicitor for Western Australia, on behalf of the State, has filed: (a) a Minute of Consent Orders which has been signed by the parties to the proceeding; and (b) a Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title. 3 The Principal Legal Officer of the Kimberley Land Council (KLC), on behalf of the Applicant, has filed: (a) an affidavit of Ms Gemma Marni Acland affirmed 15 September 2021 (Acland Affidavit).

Procedural history 4 On 8 August 2013 and 10 November 2014 respectively, the Mount Jowlaenga Polygon #1 application (proceeding WAD24 of 2019) and the Mount Jowlaenga Polygon #2 application (proceeding WAD331 of 2014) were filed. The Joombarn-buru Application was filed with the Court pursuant to s 61 of the Native Title Act on 7 November 2019. On 20 February 2020, Bromberg J made orders combining the Joombarn-buru Application with the Mount Jowlaenga #1 and Mount Jowlaenga #2 claims, with all three matters to be continued under the application number WAD 575 of 2019 and known as the Joombarn-buru Application. All respondent parties to the Mount Jowlaenga #1 and Mount Jowlaenga #2 claims became respondents to the Joombarn-buru Application. 5 The Joombarn-buru Application was notified by the Native Title Registrar pursuant to s 66 of the Native Title Act. The period of three months after the notification day referred to in s 66(8) and s 66(10)(c) of the Native Title Act ended on 28 April 2020. 6 The claim made in the Joombarn-buru Application was considered by the Native Title Registrar pursuant to s 190A of the Native Title Act (the registration test). The Native Title Registrar was satisfied that the Joombarn-buru Application was sufficient to meet the requirements of the registration test, and details of the application were entered onto the Register of Native Title Claims on 22 May 2020. 7 The current parties to the Joombarn-buru Application are: (a) the Applicant; (b) the State; (c) Yeeda Station Pty Ltd; (d) Kimberley Quarry Pty Ltd; and (e) Sheffield Resources Limited.

THE APPLICANT AND DETERMINATION AREA 8 The Joombarn-buru Application is made by Ms Rowena Mouda, Ms Francesca Ishiguchi, Ms Thalia Lorna Kelly, Ms Rona Charles, Ms Rosita Shaw, Mr Richard Manado, Ms Marie Manado, Ms Bianca Cook, Mr Wayne Bergmann, Mr Mark Manolis, Mr Nathan Lennard, Ms Rosie Nunju and Ms Lydia Clancy Skinner (the Applicant) on behalf of the Joombarn-buru native title claimants. 9 The Joombarn-buru native title claimants are those persons who are described in Schedule 6 of the Determination. 10 The external boundaries of the Determination Area are described in Schedule 1 to the Determination and shown on the map at Schedule 2 to the Determination.

THE JOOMBARN-BURU APPLICATION AND NATIVE TITLE HOLDING GROUP 11 The Joombarn-buru Application covers approximately 940 square kilometres of the mid-Dampier Peninsula in the western Kimberley region of Western Australia, mid-way between the towns of Broome to the west and Derby to the east. 12 The Joombarn-buru Application is surrounded by determined native title claims: the Nyikina Mangala determinations to the east and north (see Watson on behalf of the Nyikina Mangala People v State of Western Australia (No 6) [2014] FCA 545 and Watson on behalf of the Nyikina Mangala People (Nyikina Mangala #2) v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 1132), the Yawuru determination to the south (see Rubibi Community v State of Western Australia (No 7) [2006] FCA 459) and the Bindunbur determinations to the west and north (see Manado (on behalf of the Bindunbur Native Title Claim Group) v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 854 and Manado (on behalf of the Bindunbur Native Title Claim Group) v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 30). 13 The Joombarn-buru native title claimants are those Aboriginal people who are the descendants of the people listed in [2] of Schedule 6 to the Determination, or who are recognised by those people as having traditional rights and interests in the Joombarn-buru Application area under traditional law and custom. 14 The parties note that the description of the native title holders in Schedule 6 of the Determination does not precisely align with the description of those claiming native title in Schedule A of the 'Amended Native Title Determination Application - Claimant Application (Form 1)', as filed on 5 March 2020. 15 Notwithstanding this non-alignment, the Court may make a determination in terms of that now proposed: see Billy Patch and Others on behalf of the Birriliburu People v State of Western Australia [2008] FCA 944 (at [18]) and Watson (No 6) (at [33]). A determination in the terms sought is appropriate because the description that now appears in Schedule 6 to the Determination: (a) is the result of extensive additional genealogical/anthropological research undertaken in relation to the Joombarn-buru Application and in consultation with the Joombarn-buru claimants; (b) is agreed to by the Joombarn-buru claimants; (c) does not exclude any person said to hold native title rights and interests in the Joombarn-buru Application Area, but rather ensures that all those who have been identified and accepted as holding native title are accurately captured in Schedule 6; and (d) is accepted and agreed to by the respondent parties, including the State.

ASSESSMENT OF CONNECTION MATERIALS AND CONNECTION TO COUNTRY OF THE CLAIMANTS 16 The Applicant provided the State with the materials listed below (connection and occupation material) in support of the Joombarn-buru native title claimants' connection to, and occupation of, the Joombarn-buru claim area: (a) the 'Fraser River - Mount Jowlaenga - Deep Creek Research Report' by Mr Craig Elliott, Consultant Anthropologist dated 11 November 2019 (Elliott Report); (b) an affidavit of Mr Brendan Charles affirmed 11 November 2014; (c) an affidavit of Mr Wayne Thomas Bergmann affirmed 15 November 2019; (d) a table entitled 'Registration Test: Information submitted in relation to the Joombarn-Buru Claim which addresses the merit requirements (s 190B)'; (e) an unattributed submission entitled 'Applicant's Additional Material provided to the Native Title Registrar for the purposes of deciding whether to place the claim on the Register of Native Title Claims' dated 18 November 2019; (f) 'Joombarn-buru Native Title Determination Application (WAD 575 of 2019) State Response on Connection - Further explanation on Select Apical Ancestors' by Ms Hana McDonald (KLC Anthropologist) dated 19 May 2020; (g) additional information on the contemporary views of claim group members about the connection to the claim area of descendants of Ms Annie Murrjal and Blanki, Mr Tommy Numarid, Garlmarr and Mr Brumby Waddadul; (h) map depicting the walking tracks referred to in Table 4 of the Elliott Report; and (i) a supplementary Report for the Joombarn-buru native title claim by Ms McDonald dated 3 September 2021.

The Native Title Holders 17 The members of the Joombarn-buru Native Title Holding Group (the Native Title Holders) hold, share and observe one system of laws and customs by which they are affiliated with the Joombarn-buru Determination Area. 18 The Determination Area is an area described as pindan; a relatively dry inland region, in parts thickly covered by stunted trees with some nearly permanent water sources and reports of underground water. Significant landmarks in the area include the Fraser River, Mount Jowlaenga, Reeves Hill and Mount Clarkson to the north, and the headwaters of Deep Creek in the south. 19 In Manado (on behalf of the Bindunbur Native Title Claim Group) v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 1367 (at [282]), North J found that country in the pindan was held in common by people with native title rights and interests in adjoining country. 20 People traditionally met at Mount Jowlaenga for trade and ceremony. Language labels recorded by ethnographers and associated with the Joombarn-buru Determination Area are Nimanburr, Warrwa, Nyikina, Nyul Nyul, Jabirr Jabirr, Ngumbarl and Yawuru, those most closely associated with the majority of the Area being Nimanburr and Nyikina. 21 Effective sovereignty refers to the approximate year or years by which the acknowledgement and observance of traditional laws and customs by any Aboriginal peoples then occupying the Determination Area are likely to have been materially affected by the presence or activities of non-Aboriginal people on or near to the Determination Area. The time of effective sovereignty in the Determination Area has been identified in the Elliott Report as 1880, based upon the survey in the region by Alexander Forrest in 1879, the establishment of the Yeeda pastoral lease (which historically included the Determination Area) and the declaration of the Port of Derby in 1880. 22 The estimated birth dates for the apical ancestors listed in Schedule 6 of the Determination are from the mid to late 1800s, thus placing them in the region of the Determination Area before or at effective sovereignty. 23 The system of law and custom under which people are affiliated with country, and which has been maintained and transmitted from generation to generation, since prior to effective sovereignty, and by reasonable inference since prior to the declaration of sovereignty in Western Australia in 1829, is held at the regional societal level. The rights and interests in land and waters which are distributed throughout the community of Native Title Holders are derived from this body of traditional laws and customs.

Acquiring rights and interests in country 24 The Native Title Holders derive rights and interests in the Determination Area under their system of traditional law and custom through descent, including adoption. 25 Mr Elliott states that: … current perceptions of contemporary land tenure principles highlight genealogical (including adoptive) ancestral affiliations as the basis of acquiring interests and entitlements in land. 26 Mr Charles, a member of the Native Title Holders, identified his connection to the claim area by stating: My buru or country is Langi Langi, Yeeda Station (including Willare), Fraser River and Mt Jowlaenga. This is my buru because this is where my ancestors are from - through my mother from my mother's mother.

Access and resource use on country 27 Given the nature of the pindan country, and from his consideration of the ethnographic literature, Mr Elliott concluded that: pre-sovereignty the [Determination] Area was resource rich with unreliable water sources, and thus a transitional zone between coast and inland, Peninsula and inland-riverine people. As a transitional or interface zone it was not in the 'heartland' of any affiliated group(s); was occupied temporarily and seasonally; and traversed by walking routes utilized during trade, religious and marriage arrangements. 28 Senior and knowledgeable informants told Mr Elliott that: the [Determination] Area, then part of Yeeda, was a regional meeting place. Old-time walking tracks, used for trade, ceremonies and hunting, followed mythic song routes ... 29 Mr Charles gives evidence about contemporary use of the Determination Area by members of the native title holding group: I have the right to take and use things like ochre, sand and charcoal. Mt Jowlaenga has red, yellow, white and brown ochre that is taken for law ceremonies back to the communities. I've spent a lot of time hunting, fishing and camping in the Mt Jowlaenga area …It's the best country for hunting - it's really fat with food. You can get barni and wilga (which are both types of goanna) and duck, turkey (jalmaragurdany), magpie geese (noognoog), red kangaroo and even sometimes emu. Emu is tricky to get, because they're really cunning. 30 The connection and occupation material is sufficient to demonstrate that the Joombarn-buru Application has a credible basis and that the claimants and their ancestors have maintained a presence in the Joombarn-buru Determination Area since the acquisition of British sovereignty. The State accepts this sufficiency. In addition, evidence of the claimants' and their ancestors' continuing physical or spiritual involvement in the Joombarn-buru Determination Area was sufficient to enable the State to conclude that this connection has not been severed. Taken together, the State was satisfied that the material considered was sufficient to evidence the maintenance of connection according to traditional laws and customs in the Joombarn-buru Determination Area. The State was also satisfied that the connection and occupation material was sufficient to establish that the claimants occupied that part of the Joombarn-buru Determination Area to which s 47B is agreed to apply.

AUTHORISATION 31 Section 61(1) of the Native Title Act permits the making of a native title determination application by those persons who are authorised: by all the persons (the native title claim group) who, according to their traditional laws and customs, hold the common or group rights and interests comprising the particular native title claimed… Section 251B of the Native Title Act defines the term 'authorise' for the purpose of making a native title determination (or compensation) application. 32 Further, the Native Title Act vests in the persons jointly comprising the applicant the carriage of a native title determination application. Section 62A of the Native Title Act relevantly provides that in the case of a claimant application, 'the applicant may deal with all matters arising under this Act in relation to the application'. This includes consenting to a determination of native title pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act. 33 The Joombarn-buru native title claim group met in Broome on 25 and 26 August 2021. At that meeting they considered and authorised the Applicant to consent to the Joombarn-buru Determination. 34 On the basis of the evidence set out in the Acland Affidavit, the Applicant is authorised to consent to the Court making a determination in or consistent with the terms of the Determination.

SECTION 87 OF THE NATIVE TITLE ACT IS SATISFIED 35 The three preconditions to an exercise of power under s 87 of the Native Title Act (see Freddie v Northern Territory [2017] FCA 867 per Mortimer J (at [12])) have been met: (a) the period specified in the notice given under s 66 of the Native Title Act has ended; (b) agreement has been reached by the parties on the terms of an order in relation to the proceedings; and (c) the terms of that agreement, in writing signed by or on behalf of the parties, has been filed with the Court. 36 As noted by Mortimer J in Freddie (at [14]): Where those preconditions exist, as they do in relation to the present application, the Court has jurisdiction under s 87(1A) of the Native Title Act to make orders in the form filed by the parties, or consistent with that form. Before it can make such an order, the Court must be satisfied of two matters: (1) First, that the orders as filed or proposed are 'within the power of the Court' to make: s 87(1)(c). (2) Second, that the orders filed or proposed are 'appropriate': s 87(1A).

The orders as filed or proposed are 'within the power of the Court': s 87(1)(c) 37 No restrictions under the Native Title Act apply to the proposed Joombarn-buru Determination. There is no approved determination of native title in relation to the area the subject of the proposed Determination (s 68 of the Native Title Act). 38 The orders sought in the proposed Determination set out the details of the matters required by s 225 of the Native Title Act (s 94A of the Native Title Act) and they concern rights and interests which the Australian common law is able to recognise (s 223(1)(c) of the Native Title Act): see Freddie (at [15]).

The Orders as filed or proposed are 'appropriate': s 87(1A) 39 Prior to the amendment of the Native Title Act in 2009, the requirement that the Court must consider it appropriate to make the determination sought by the parties was contained in s 87(1). Given the identical wording between s 87(1A) and the old s 87(1) in respect of this requirement, the Court's discretion pursuant to the s 87(1A) imports the same principles as those applying to the making of a consent determination of native title prior to the amendment. 40 As noted by Bennett J in Hughes (on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 365 (at [8], citing Black CJ in Warria v Queensland; [2005] FCA 1117 (2005) 223 ALR 62 at [7]) that: … discretion conferred by s 87(1) must be exercised judicially and within the broad boundaries ascertained by reference to the subject matter, scope and purpose of the Act. That includes the resolution of native title disputes by mediation and agreement. 41 Similarly, North J in Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848 stated (at [8]) that: The Act makes mediation the primary means of resolution of native title cases. It is designed to encourage parties to take responsibility for resolution of proceedings without the need for litigation. Section 87 must be construed in this context. The section provides a power which is exercisable only when an agreement has been made. The power must be exercised flexibly and with regard to the purpose for which the section is designed. The section should not be construed to require parties in agreement to produce evidence as if in a trial. 42 As noted by Logan J in Owens on behalf of the Tagalaka People v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 1396 (at [14]): The primary consideration of the court is to determine whether there is agreement and whether it was freely entered into on an informed basis. 43 Accordingly, in order to make a consent determination of native title under s 87 of the Native Title Act, the Court is not necessarily required to receive evidence, make findings or embark on its own inquiry on the merits of the claim made in the application. Rather, the Court must be satisfied, inter alia, that it is appropriate to make the orders sought. The indicia that will be sufficient to satisfy the Court of the appropriateness in making a consent determination will be determined on a case by case basis. In some cases it may be appropriate to make orders under s 87 where the Court has received no evidence of the primary facts substantiating native title if the Court is satisfied that the parties have freely, and on an informed basis, come to an agreement: see Hughes (at [9]), Ward (at [8]) and Owens (at [14]). 44 Further, the requirements of s 87 may, and will likely, be met where the Court is satisfied that a relevant government respondent (including the State), through competent legal representation, is satisfied as to the cogency of the evidence upon which the Applicant relies. Generally, this will not involve the Court making findings on the evidence on which the government respondent relies, but it might consider that evidence for the limited purpose of being satisfied that the government respondent is acting in good faith and rationally: see Munn v Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; (2001) 115 FCR 109 (at [29]-[30]) per Emmett J and Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 per North J (at [37]). See also Smith v Western Australia [2000] FCA 1249; (2000) 104 FCR 494 (at [38]), where Madgwick J said: State governments are necessarily obliged to subject claims for native title over lands and waters owned and occupied by the State and State agencies, to scrutiny just as careful as the community would expect in relation to claims by non-Aborigines to significant rights over such land. 45 In the context of a consent determination, the Court is not required to satisfy itself that the State party has concluded that in all probability the claim would succeed before the Court if it was litigated. The State party need only be satisfied that there is a credible or cogent basis for the claim in order to conclude that the requirements of s 223 of the Native Title Act are satisfied: see Western Bundjalung People v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 992 per Jagot J (at [20]-[21]). 46 In relation to this proceeding, the Applicant and the State have been legally represented throughout the consent determination negotiation process. 47 The State has played an active role in the negotiation of the proposed Joombarn-buru Determination, an important factor referred to by Emmett J in Munn. In doing so, the State (acting on behalf of the community generally), having regard to the requirements of the Native Title Act and through a rigorous and detailed assessment process, has satisfied itself that the Joombarn-buru Determination is justified in all of the circumstances. 48 The connection and occupation material is sufficient to demonstrate that the Application has a credible basis and that the Joombarn-buru People have maintained a physical presence in the Determination Area since the acquisition of British sovereignty. In addition, evidence of their continuing physical or spiritual involvement in the Determination Area was sufficient to enable the State to conclude that this connection has not been severed. Taken together, the State is satisfied that the material presented is sufficient to evidence the maintenance of connection according to traditional laws and customs in the Determination Area, and occupation of a part of that area for the purposes of s 47B of the Native Title Act. 49 The State has also conducted searches of land tenure, mining and petroleum registries to determine the extent of 'other interests' within the proposed Determination Area, and those interests are included in Schedule 6 of the Determination. 50 In the circumstances, the Court can be satisfied that an order under s 87 of the Native Title Act is appropriate.

PRESCRIBED BODY CORPORATE 51 It is proposed that the prescribed body corporate that will hold the native title rights and interests in trust for the Native Title Holders is the Joombarn-buru Aboriginal Corporation ICN 9583. The appropriate nomination and consent notices were filed on 14 September 2021.

CONCLUSION 52 The parties are to be congratulated on reaching this important agreement. The determination of Native Title by the Court does not create Native Title, but rather, recognises that the Applicant has proven to the satisfaction of the legal requirement that they have at all relevant times held the requisite connection to the land. At the same time, the Determination recognises the rights of others to the use of the land. For these reasons, the orders are made. I certify that the preceding fifty-two (52) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice McKerracher.