Lianos v Order of AHEPA NSW Inc
[2020] NSWCA 193
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (NSW)
Decision date
2020-02-27
Before
Macfarlan JA, Meagher JA, Rees J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (46 paragraphs)
Introduction This appeal is concerned with the affairs of the first respondent, Order of AHEPA NSW Inc (the Association), which is an association incorporated under the Associations Incorporation Act 1984 (NSW) (the 1984 Associations Act). The 1984 Associations Act has been superseded by the Associations Incorporation Act 2009 (NSW) (the 2009 Associations Act). The second respondent, NSW Commissioner for Fair Trading (the Commissioner), administers both the 1984 Associations Act and the 2009 Associations Act. The appellants, Mr George Lianos, Mr Con Gouros and Mr Luke Kyprios (together, the Dissenting Members), are members of the Association.
- The present dispute was brought to a head by a proposal for the Association to enter into arrangements with Bayside Council (the Council) concerning the site of Bexley North Bowling Club, which is owned by the Council. The proposal involves demolition and removal of an existing building, the construction of a new building and car park, reinstatement of an existing rundown bowling green and ultimately the construction of a new multipurpose hall for use by the Association (the Project). The proposal involves the grant by the Council to the Association of a lease of the proposed developed site for a minimum term of 21 years.
- At a meeting on 28 February 2019 (the February 2019 Meeting), which was purportedly a general meeting of the Association, resolutions were passed:
- to authorise the Committee of Management of the Association to proceed with negotiations with the Council regarding the Project; and
- to authorise the Committee of Management of the Association to obtain funds not exceeding $7 million for the construction and completion of stage one of the Project. A dispute concerning the validity of those resolutions exposed more fundamental questions concerning the constitution and rules of the Association and eligibility for membership of the Association. Those questions arose out of a meeting held on 13 November 2018 (the November 2018 Meeting), at which a resolution was passed adopting a new constitution for the Association. The November 2018 Meeting was purportedly convened as a special general meeting of the Association. The dispute concerning the November 2018 Meeting arose out of the participation of individuals whose status as members is questioned. If they were not members, that would affect the validity of the November 2018 Meeting.