57 On 3 December 2002, counsel for the school addressed the jury, completing his address immediately prior to lunch. Mr Richards SC immediately applied for an order that I discharge the jury based on the statements made to the jury that were considered by the Court of Appeal. Submissions had not been completed by 2:15 pm when I directed that Mr Middleton address the jury, adjourning the application to later in the afternoon, when argument was completed. I ruled on the application, refusing it, the following morning. Thereafter, Mr Richards took most of the balance of the day to address the jury. In the middle of the afternoon session, I commenced to charge the jury and continued to do so on 5 December. The court did not sit on 6 December and I continued to charge the jury on 7 and 10 December. The jury retired to consider its verdict during the latter part of the afternoon session on 10 December. During the charge, but outside of usual court hours, the plaintiff applied to discharge the jury on the inappropriate body language ground, which was an appeal ground dismissed by the Court of Appeal, and, related to that application, applied for security and other video footage taken inside the court. The jury returned its verdict at lunchtime on 11 December 2012 and on 12 December 2012, I heard submissions on costs and final orders, delivering an ex tempore ruling that day.