Haulton Construction Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Haulton Constructions
[2011] FCA 497
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Federal Court of Australia
Decision date
2011-05-12
Before
Gordon J
Catchwords
- Number of paragraphs: 22
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Judgment (3 paragraphs)
Background 1 The plaintiff, Haulton Construction Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 005 774 621) (HCS), was incorporated on or around 17 February 1981. At all relevant times, the directors of HCS have been George Holt and Anthony Weinberg. The shareholders of HCS, as at 11 May 2011, were Toora Park Investments Pty Ltd and Holt and Hoddinott Trading Pty Ltd. On or about 27 July 2009, pursuant to a creditors' voluntary winding up, HCS was wound up and Andrew William Poulter was appointed as a liquidator. I understand that HCS was subsequently wound up in insolvency by members' resolution. 2 On or around 14 May 2009, Haulton Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (ACN 137 110 288) (HCA) was incorporated. The sole director and secretary of HCA is Margaret Ellen Jane Hoddinott. The shareholders of HCA as at 11 May 2011 were Ms Hoddinott and Richard Kennedy Llewellyn. It was suggested that Ms Hoddinott of HCA is either married to or in a de facto relationship with Mr Holt, a director of HCS. As at 10 May 2011, they were both directors of Holt and Hoddinott Trading Pty Ltd. I understand that HCA and HCS carried on very similar if not identical businesses. 3 In or around late January 2011, HCA ceased trading. On or around 1 February 2011, HCA sold various company assets and interests for $562,393.92. There is no evidence of to whom these assets were sold, or in what circumstances. 4 By way of application filed on 21 March 2011, HCS sought the winding up of HCA on the grounds of insolvency pursuant to s 459P of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act). This application was lodged following the failure of HCA to comply with a statutory demand made of it by HCS on 16 February 2011. The debt at the time of service of the statutory demand was some $47,768.41, which was comprised of superannuation liabilities assumed by HCA pursuant to a Sale Agreement concluded with HCS on 19 May 2009. The winding up application was returnable on 2 May 2011 at 2:15pm. There is no evidence to suggest that there is any, let alone a genuine dispute, about the existence or amount of this debt. Also at or around this time, Malcolm Howell (a partner at Jirsch Sutherland) formally provided consent to act as liquidator of HCA if appointed by the Court. 5 On 28 April 2011, HCA appointed David Ross and Richard Albarran of Hall Chadwick as joint and several administrators, pursuant to a resolution of Ms Hoddinott. Following this, on or around 2 May 2011, Mr Ross circulated an Initial Report to Creditors to the known creditors of HCA. This report stated that a further report to creditors would be distributed prior to the second creditors' meeting. The first meeting of creditors was scheduled for 10 May at 10:30 am. 6 On 2 May 2011, Mr Poulter's solicitors wrote to Mr Ross, requesting information about (among other things) the nature of the work undertaken by Mr Ross and his firm on behalf of or in relation to HCA. As no response was received, this was followed up by Mr Poulter's solicitors with another letter on 9 May 2011. 7 Also on 2 May, the application for the winding up of HCA came before the Court. The solicitors for Messrs Ross and Albarran sought an adjournment of the hearing of this application. Solicitors for Mr Poulter opposed this on a number of bases, including that HCA was "clearly hopelessly insolvent", no proposal for a Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) had been put forward, and there was no evidence that it was in the interest of HCA's creditors to adjourn the application. At this hearing, solicitors for CoInvest Limited (ACN 078 004 785), a creditor owed $27,110.60 by HCA, appeared in support of the application for winding up. Subsequently, the solicitors for CoInvest Limited informed the Court that their client no longer wished to take part in these proceedings. 8 On this day, Registrar Allaway adjourned the further hearing of the application to 12 May 2011 at 2:15pm. HCA was ordered to file and serve any affidavits on which it wanted to rely by 6 May 2011. This was to include evidence of the status of HCA, and any proposal for a DOCA (if relevant). HCS was ordered to file and serve any affidavits in reply by 10 May 2011. Costs were reserved. It was also agreed that the first meeting of HCA's creditors would be held before 12 May. 9 On 3 May 2011, Rocla Pty Ltd, trading as Rocla Pipeline Products, filed a Creditor's Petition against the director of the defendant, Ms Hoddinott, in the Adelaide Registry of the Federal Magistrates' Court. The petition is returnable on 6 June 2011. I understand that Rocla Pty Ltd is a creditor of both HCS and HCA. 10 On 4 May 2011, Mr Poulter wrote to creditors of HCA in his capacity as liquidator of HCS, informing the creditors of HCS's application to have HCA wound up and his opposition to any further adjournment of this hearing. In this letter, Mr Poulter expressed reservations about the ability of Ms Hoddinott to put forward a workable DOCA proposal, and sought the creditors' support for a resolution to be put at the first meeting of creditors that Messrs Ross and Albarran be removed as administrators, and Mr Howell be appointed in their place. 11 On 10 May 2011, the first meeting of HCA's creditors was held. Both Mr Ross and Mr Poulter attended. Mr Ross apparently informed the meeting that he had no information regarding a proposed DOCA, and that he had not investigated whether Ms Hoddinott as director of HCA could propose such an arrangement.