Hamlett on behalf of the Wajarri Yamatji People (Part E) v State of Western Australia
[2021] FCA 868
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Federal Court of Australia
Decision date
2021-07-29
Before
Griffiths J
Catchwords
- NATIVE TITLE - consent determination - requirements of ss 87 and 94A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) satisfied - appropriate to make orders
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Judgment (21 paragraphs)
A. On 19 October 2017, the Hon Justice Griffiths partially determined the Wajarri Yamatji #1 Application (WAD 6033 of 1998), known as ʻWajarri Yamatji (Part A)'. B. On 23 April 2018, the Hon Justice Griffiths also partially determined the Wajarri Yamatji #1 Application and the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application (WAD 382 of 2017) known as 'Wajarri Yamatji (Part B)'. The Part B Determination Area did not cover any area of unallocated Crown land within the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application that was covered by the grant of an exploration licence or a prospecting licence under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) when the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application was made (1 August 2017). C. These areas were excluded from the Part B Determination Area as, at the date of the Part B Determination, whether or not an exploration tenement was a "lease" within the meaning in subsection 47B(1)(b)(i) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) was an issue before the High Court that had not yet been heard. Accordingly it remained controversial as to whether section 47B of the Native Title Act could apply to those areas of unallocated Crown land. D. On 7 December 2018, the Hon Justice Griffiths determined the Wajarri Yamatji #4 Application (WAD 44 of 2018) and Wajarri Yamatji #5 Application (WAD 157 of 2018) (known as 'Wajarri Yamatji (Part C)'). Those native title determination applications fell within the external boundaries of both the Wajarri Yamatji #1 Application and Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application and were made to seek the benefit of the application of section 47B of the Native Title Act. In particular, the Wajarri Yamatji #4 and #5 Applications were made in relation to areas of unallocated Crown land within the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application which, at the time of the making of the relevant applications, were no longer subject to the grant of an exploration licence or a prospecting licence under the Mining Act 1978 (WA). E. On 17 April 2019 the High Court in Tjungarrayi v Western Australia [2019] HCA 12; 366 ALR 603 held that the exploration tenements were not "leases" within the meaning of section 47B(1)(b)(i) of the Native Title Act, with the result that the exploration tenements did not disapply the application of section 47B of the Native Title Act in the area of those tenements. Accordingly, section 47B of the Native Title Act could apply in respect of the undetermined portion of the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application. F. In relation to the remaining portion of the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Application, being that area not subject to the Wajarri Yamatji Part B and C Determinations or the proposed Wajarri Yamatji Part D Determination (namely the area subject to the Wajarri Yamatji #6 Application (WAD373 of 2018)) the Wajarri Yamatji #2 Applicant, the State of Western Australia and other Respondents to the proceedings ("the parties") have reached an agreement as to the terms of a determination of native title which the parties submit should be made in relation to that area ("the Part E Determination Area"). G. The external boundaries of the Part E Determination Area are described in Schedule One to the Part E Determination. H. Pursuant to sub-section 87(1) of the Native Title Act the parties have filed with this Court an agreement in writing setting out the terms of the agreement reached. I. The terms of the agreement involve the making of consent orders for a determination pursuant to sections 87 and 94A of the Native Title Act. J. Having regard to the requirements in sections 67 and 68 of the Native Title Act orders are also sought dismissing the Wajarri Yamatji #1 Application to the extent that it covers the Part E Determination Area. K. The parties acknowledge that the effect of the making of the Part E Determination is that the members of the native title claim group, in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by them, should be recognised as the native title holders for the Part E Determination Area as set out in the Part E Determination. L. Pursuant to sub-section 87(2) of the Native Title Act, the parties have requested that the Court determine the proceedings that relate to the Part E Determination Area without holding a hearing. BEING SATISFIED that a determination of native title in the terms set out in Attachment A would be within the power of the Court and, it appearing to the Court appropriate to do so, pursuant to sections 87 and 94A of the Native Title Act and by the consent of the parties: