© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2014] FCA 1318
Federal Court of Australia
2014-12-05
Rangiah J
Original judgment source is linked above.
Number of paragraphs: 45
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr C Reiach of Queensland South Native Title Services Limited
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms A Cope of Crown Law
Solicitor for the Second and Seventh Respondents: Mr C Graham of MacDonnells Law
Solicitor for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Respondents: Did not appear
Solicitor for the Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Respondents: Did not appear
Solicitor for the Twelfth Respondent: Did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 548 of 2012
BETWEEN: MARSHALL FOSTER, REEGHAN FINLAY, JAMIE ROBERT FRID, DON HARDING, GRANT JACKSON, BRADLEY SAUNDERS, MICHELLE SAUNDERS ON BEHALF OF THE GUNGGARI PEOPLE #3
JUDGE: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 5 DECEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: AMBY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: BEING SATISFIED that an order in the terms set out below is within the power of the Court, and it appearing appropriate to the Court to do so, pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
(b) The waters within the External Boundary Description including but not limited to: (i) Maranoa River; (ii) Amby Creek; (iii) Little Tartulla Creek; (iv) Stewart Creek. Part 2 - External Boundary Description Commencing at a point at Longitude 148.326183° East, Latitude 26.304873° South; being the intersection of the external boundaries of Native Title Determination Application QUD216/08 Bidjara People (QC08/5) and Native Title Determination Application QUD366/08 Mandandanji People (QC08/10), and extending generally southerly along the western boundary of Native Title Determination Application QUD366/08 Mandandanji People (QC08/10) to its intersection with the eastern boundary of Native Title Determination Application QUD6027/01 Gunggari People #2 (QC01/28) at Latitude 27.555703° South, also being a point on the western bank of Maranoa River. Further described as: Commencing at a point at Longitude 148.326183° East, Latitude 26.304873° South and extending generally southerly a point on the western bank of Maranoa River at Latitude 27.555703° South, passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude ° East Latitude ° South 148.326165 26.308980 148.329173 26.328224 148.330866 26.345408 148.332556 26.363410 148.332484 26.380573 148.339003 26.405988 148.340676 26.428486 148.348077 26.455546 148.355063 26.476879 148.360271 26.501052 148.368160 26.519125 148.376069 26.532294 148.376921 26.540886 148.376876 26.552738 148.376822 26.566633 148.376706 26.596875 148.375779 26.607899 148.373523 26.619317 148.373469 26.633212 148.373411 26.648333 148.373352 26.663454 148.373310 26.674488 148.373243 26.691653 148.373191 26.705139 148.374896 26.722733 148.376610 26.737875 148.379654 26.753031 148.382700 26.767778 148.382653 26.780039 148.383926 26.795584 148.388298 26.811573 148.388250 26.824651 148.388210 26.835277 148.388166 26.847129 148.388135 26.855303 148.385884 26.864269 148.384077 26.872831 148.384051 26.879779 148.384464 26.887958 148.387551 26.892897 148.393308 26.895823 148.401283 26.899183 148.410586 26.903374 148.421223 26.907171 148.430518 26.914222 148.438042 26.920436 148.439339 26.931076 148.443276 26.948694 148.444568 26.960969 148.448540 26.968369 148.453393 26.978231 148.460473 26.986481 148.461324 26.998343 148.467632 27.010703 148.473338 27.027984 148.480403 27.041162 148.485695 27.052690 148.494101 27.065874 148.500287 27.077404 148.506039 27.086879 148.511324 27.100869 148.513491 27.114025 148.514318 27.127584 148.514251 27.141551 148.514189 27.154696 148.514136 27.165788 148.520313 27.181014 148.526945 27.194598 148.533576 27.209004 148.538880 27.220939 148.544172 27.235750 148.548113 27.253840 148.552080 27.265769 148.555154 27.278105 148.561778 27.296206 148.571092 27.312674 148.580410 27.329141 148.587497 27.345188 148.591015 27.359578 148.590956 27.374366 148.590899 27.388742 148.588160 27.402698 148.588107 27.415843 148.588059 27.428165 148.542458 27.474899 148.480010 27.512289
Then generally northerly along the western bank of that river (also being the eastern boundary of Native Title Determination Application QUD6027/01 Gunggari People #2 (QC01/28)) to its intersection with Native Title Determination Application QUD216/08 Bidjara People (QC08/5) at Latitude 26.772304° South; then easterly and generally northeasterly along the boundary of that native tile determination application back to the commencement point. Further described as: Then easterly to the eastern bank of Amby Creek at Latitude 26.772400° South; then generally north easterly along that bank to Latitude 26.552557° South; then again generally north easterly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude ° East Latitude ° South 148.192166 26.552277 148.192120 26.552041 148.192111 26.551994 148.192006 26.551727 148.191992 26.551686 148.191923 26.551477 148.191872 26.551105 148.191867 26.551070 148.191738 26.550735 148.191746 26.550538 148.191713 26.550509 148.201601 26.539359 148.220772 26.517489 148.236836 26.483762 148.250696 26.454002 148.272720 26.422215 148.288114 26.398380 148.304238 26.373878 148.324729 26.340774 148.318506 26.315752
Then north easterly back to the commencement point. Exclusions This application does not include the land and waters within the following native title determination applications: QUD6027/01 Gunggari People #2 (QC01/28) as filed in the Federal Court 23/08/2001 and amended on 15/12/2011. QUD216/08 Bidjara People (QC08/5) as filed in the Federal Court 23/07/2008. QUD366/08 Mandandanji People (QC08/10) as filed in the Federal Court 06/11/2008. The application does not include the following waters: Eurella Creek; Muckadilla Creek; Ballaroo Creek; and Waters covered by any previous exclusive possession act as defined by the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). B. Map of Determination Area Schedule 2 - AREAS NOT FORMING PART OF THE DETERMINATION AREA The areas in this Schedule are excluded from the Determination Area on the grounds that at the time at which the native title determination application was made - these areas were the subject of one or more previous exclusive possession acts, as defined in s 23B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), despite the fact that the areas, or parts of them, may have been subject to earlier acts that extinguished native title; and therefore, in accordance with s 61A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), these areas could not be claimed. Public Works Based Exclusions: The land or waters on which any public work, as defined in s 253 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), is constructed, established or situated, and to which ss 23B(7) and 23C(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and/or s 23B(7) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and s 21 of the Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993 (Qld), applies, together with any adjacent land or waters in accordance with s 251D of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Schedule 3 - NATIVE TITLE HOLDERS
BETWEEN: MARSHALL FOSTER, REEGHAN FINLAY, JAMIE ROBERT FRID, DON HARDING, GRANT JACKSON, BRADLEY SAUNDERS, MICHELLE SAUNDERS ON BEHALF OF THE GUNGGARI PEOPLE #3
JUDGE: RANGIAH J DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2014 PLACE: AMBY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The application before the Court seeks a determination of native title on behalf of the Gunggari People in an area of south-western Queensland. The application is made under s 61(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ("the NTA"). It is known as Gunggari People #3 application. 2 The parties have reached agreement and ask the Court to make orders in terms they have agreed without holding a hearing. 3 The Court is satisfied that it is appropriate to make the agreed orders. The Court will determine that native title is held by the Gunggari People in the determination area. The Court will also determine, amongst other things, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests and the relationship between native title rights and interests and other interests in the determination area. 4 By the Court's orders, the Australian community collectively recognises the status of the Gunggari People as the traditional owners of the land and waters in the determination area. It is important to emphasise that the Court's orders do not grant that status. The Court orders merely recognise that they are the traditional owners and have been since before the European settlement. 5 There has already been a determination of native title in favour of the Gunggari People in an area adjoining the southern and western portions of the present determination area: Kearns on behalf of the Gunggari People #2 v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 651. In his reasons for judgment, Reeves J noted that the first application for a determination of native title on behalf of the Gunggari People was commenced in 1996. Since then their claims have had a long and complicated procedural history. A part of that history is set out in the frequently cited decision of Emmett J in Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109. The present determination is an important step towards the final resolution of the Gunggari People's claims. 6 The determination is in respect of land and waters covering an area of approximately 4,166 km2, situated roughly between the towns of Amby and Muckadilla in the north and Begonia, approximately 55 km north of St George, in the south. The determination covers a 120 km stretch of the Maranoa River from its junction with Amby Creek southerly to Begonia. 7 The State of Queensland, the Maranoa Regional Council, KGLNG E&P II Pty Ltd, PAPL (Upstream II) Pty Ltd, Santos QNT Pty Ltd, Total E&P Australia III, Ergon Energy Corporation Limited, Kaylean Terese Killen, Michael Humphrey Killen, Don James Noon, Kim Kelman Noon and Paul Steinohrt are respondents to the application.
The Gunggari People, their society and history 8 The evidence relied on by the applicant includes affidavits of Ethel Munn, Gordon Munn, Lynette Nixon, Bernys Falkner, Reeghan Finlay, Irene Ryder and Wayne Dodd. The evidence of members of the native title claim group about their traditional laws and customs and rights and responsibilities in respect to land and waters is of the highest importance: Sampi v Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 at [48] per French J. 9 The evidence also include four reports prepared by an anthropologist, Dr Natalie Kwok. Those reports are thoroughly researched, detailed and comprehensive. 10 The affidavits and the anthropological reports are important, not only for this case, but as records of the history of the Gunggari People. They deserve to be read in full. For present purposes, I can only provide a brief summary of the evidence before the Court. 11 The Gunggari People are the biological descendants of the following persons: (a) Jinnegah; (b) Jimmy and Nelly Flourbag; (c) Harry Collins; (d) Old Frog; (e) Coombra Jack; (f) Kitty of St George and Maggie of the Moonie; (g) King Billy Dick; (h) Maria of Tongy Station; (i) Harry Rookwood; (j) Lucy of the Balonne River; (k) Charlotte Moffatt; (l) Mary of the Maranoa; (m) Nellie Walker; (n) Clifton George; (o) Mary of Bollon; or (p) Kate Meathers/Meadows. 12 The ethnographic literature records that there are a number of different recordings of the name "Gunggari", principally Gugari, Gungayi, Gungga, Gugayi, Unggari and Unggay. 13 The evidence establishes that at sovereignty the Gunggari People were a distinct people with a distinct dialect and territory. They were united by a sense of shared affinity, a shared name, dialect, a distinctive set of section names and by possession of a unique corpus of myths, songs, designs and ritual practice. 14 The principle of descent is likely to have been paramount in determining affiliations to country. Members of the landholding group enjoyed primary rights of identity with their country, access and use rights, authority over and responsibility for the land and sites and spiritual affiliation with it. 15 The first European contact with the Aboriginal people of the Maranoa district was by Roderick Mitchell, the Assistant Commissioner of Crown Lands for the Liverpool district, in the period from 1844 to 1846. In 1846, Thomas Mitchell, Roderick Mitchell's father, led an expedition which traversed directly through the Gunggari claim area. Mitchell recorded numerous encounters, some friendly and some hostile, with Aboriginal people in the area and recorded that such people occupied the area and asserted territorial interests. 16 The Maranoa district was settled by Europeans from 1847. The settlement of the Maranoa district was met with concerted resistance on the part of the Aboriginal inhabitants, who targeted both the settlers and their livestock. The area to the west of the Maranoa River was settled from about 1861. 17 From the 1860s, the combined effects of direct violence from European settlers and the Native Mounted Police, enforced alienation from water and food resources, environmental degradation and introduced diseases resulted in a decline of the Gunggari population. However, the Gunggari People continued to maintain a strong presence on their country and hosted and participated in ceremonial gatherings up until the early 1900s. 18 Large Aboriginal camps were established on pastoral stations in and around the claim area including Tommo, Tongy, Bonus Downs, Albany Downs and Bindebango. Many of the Gunggari People worked on the stations. 19 The first removals under the Aboriginal Protection and Restriction of the Sale of Opium Act 1897 (Qld) from the Maranoa district occurred in 1901. From 1914 to 1941, many Gunggari were removed to government reserves and missions including Taroom, Purga, Barambah or Cherbourg, Palm Island and Woorabinda. Those who remained on country increasingly converged on the township of Mitchell. 20 By the 1920s and 1930s the Top Yumba, an Aboriginal fringe settlement on the Maranoa River, had come to house a large collection of Gunggari families who had managed to avoid removal. In 1936, after the local council ordered dispersal of the Top Yumba, a new reserve was established downstream on the east side of the river. The site, known as the Bottom Yumba, became the home for many years of a number of Gunggari families. 21 In 1967, the Gunggari community was again forcibly disbanded under Council orders. Nevertheless the people continued to meet on the Yumba and engage socially. 22 Despite the considerable geographic dispersal of the Gunggari People, they have maintained their society. 23 It is evident from the affidavits and Dr Kwok's reports that there has been substantial continuity of Gunggari traditional laws and custom up until the present. For example, the totemic system continues to be significant amongst contemporary Gunggari People, including acknowledgement and adherence to marriage rules. There is continued transmission and retention of cultural knowledge amongst the Gunggari People. Many of the Gunggari recount how their parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles and other Gunggari elders have taught them stories about Gunggari country and the Gunggari laws. These include creation stories, lessons about the bush and bush foods and proper behaviour. 24 The Gunggari People continue to believe that their ancestor spirits inhabit the country. The spirits of the land are known as Yumbinjurra and they are believed to be all around, are protectors and can be heard if one listens closely enough. 25 The Gunggari People conduct smoking ceremonies in connection with death, as a blessing, and as an initiation rite when entering country, as a cleansing ritual to ward off bad spirits for healing. Some claimants remember their families conducting smoking ceremonies to cleanse new homes of bad spirits and to ward off bad dreams. 26 Gunggari People have knowledge of many sites of significance, such as camp sites, burial sites, battle sites, waterholes and wells, artefact sites and other important places. Such sites are located throughout the claim area and beyond, in places such as Mitchell, Mungallala, Bonus Downs, Tongy, Tomoo, Abieglassie, Woodlands, Dunkeld, Teaswater, Amby, Womblebank, Morven, Albany Downs, Cashmere, Hillsborough, Lussvale, Cytheream, Thirsty Downs, Rockybank, Grassmere and Bindebango. 27 Hunting, fishing and gathering is a part of the Gunggari People's everyday lives. They hunt kangaroo, emu, echidna, sand goanna, ducks and pigeons. They fish for yellow belly cod and jew fish. They gather witchetty grubs, yabbies, mussels and other small animals. In addition, they collect resources such as honey, ochre and other plants. 28 The Gunggari People have a detailed knowledge of the best methods of preparing various types of bush tucker. They practice bush remedies, including using gum leaves for breathing maladies and boiling up supplejack leaves for sore ankles, shins and muscular pains. The umbi umbi bush is boiled to treat ailments such as sickness, sores or as an ointment for massage. 29 The Gunggari People have maintained a continuous presence on their country, despite the pressures of colonisation. 30 The evidence demonstrates that the Gunggari People have held rights and interests in the determination area under their traditional laws and customs since prior to sovereignty and have continued to do so to the present time. They have also continued to exist as a society.
The rights and interests 31 The evidence establishes, and the parties are agreed, that the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area are non-exclusive rights to: (a) access, be present on, move about on and travel over the area; (b) camp and for that purpose erect temporary shelters; (c) hunt, fish and gather on the land and waters of the area for personal, domestic and non-commercial communal purposes; (d) take and use Natural Resources from the land and waters of the area for personal, domestic and non-commercial communal purposes; (e) take and use the Water of the area for personal, domestic and non-commercial communal purposes; (f) conduct religious and spiritual activities and ceremonies on the area; (g) teach on the area the physical and spiritual attributes of the area; (h) light fires on the area for domestic purposes including cooking, but not for the purpose of hunting or clearing vegetation; and (i) maintain places of importance and areas of significance to the native title holders under their traditional laws and customs and protect those places and areas, by lawful means, from physical harm. 32 The native title rights and interests do not confer possession, occupation, use or enjoyment to the exclusion of all others. The rights and interests are subject to and exercisable in accordance with the laws of the State and the Commonwealth and the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by the native title holders. 33 The orders that the Court will make set out the nature and extent of other interests in relation to the determination area and the relationship between native title rights and interests and the other interests.
Section 87 34 Section 87 of the NTA empowers the Court to make a determination over a claim area in accordance with the orders agreed between the parties without conducting a hearing. The policy reflects objective of the NTA of resolving claims by agreement and without the need for litigation. 35 The Court is able to make a determination by consent without a hearing under s 87 if the following conditions are met: (a) each of the parties to the proceeding have reached agreement on a proposed determination of native title in respect of the claim area: s 87(1)(a); (b) the period specified in the notice given under s 66 of the NTA has ended: s 87(1); (c) the terms of the proposed determination agreement are in writing and have been signed by or on behalf of each of those parties, and a copy filed with the Court: s 87(1)(b); (d) the Registrar has given notice of the filing agreed statement of facts to the other parties to the proceeding: s 87A(3); (e) the Court is satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, those terms would be within its power: s 87(1)(c); and (f) the Court considers that making such an order would be appropriate: s 87(2). 36 The Court is not required to embark upon an inquiry as to the merits of the claim to be satisfied that the orders are supportable and in accordance with law: Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 at [3] per French J. However, the Court will consider evidence for the limited purpose of determining whether the parties who have agreed to compromise the claim, particularly the State on behalf of the community generally, have made a rational decision and are acting in good faith: Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 at [30] per Emmett J. The primary consideration of the Court is to determine whether there is an agreement and whether it was freely entered on an informed basis: Nangkiriny v State of Western Australia (2002) 117 FCR 6 at[14] per North J. 37 These principles have been considered and applied in many decisions of this Court. I consider that it is appropriate to apply them in the present proceeding. 38 Section 94A of the NTA requires the Court to set out details of the matters mentioned in s 225 when making a determination of native title. Section 225 of the NTA defines a determination of native title as follows: A determination of native title is a determination whether or not native title exists in relation to a particular area (the determination area) of land and waters and, if it does exist, a determination of: (a) who the persons, or each group of persons, holding the common or group rights comprising the native title are; and (b) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area; and (c) the nature and extent of any other interests in relation to the determination area; and (d) the relationship between the rights and interests in paragraphs (b) and (c) (taking into account the effect of this Act); and (e) to the extent that the land or waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease -- whether the native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or waters on the native title holders to the exclusion of all others. 39 I accept, by reference to the s 87 agreement, that s 225(a) of the NTA is satisfied. I also accept that the agreement complies with the requirements of s 225(b)-(e) of the NTA. 40 I am satisfied that the requirements of s 87 of the NTA have been fulfilled. I note that: (a) the period specified notice given under s 66 of the NTA ended on 9 July 2013: ss 66(1)(c) and 87(1); (b) the parties have reached agreement on a proposed determination of native title in respect the area covered by the application: s 87A(1)(b); (c) the parties have recorded their agreement and filed a copy of its terms with the Court on 20 June 2014: s 87(1)(b); (d) an order in, or consistent with, the terms proposed in the parties' agreement is within the Court's power because: (i) the application is valid and made in accordance with s 61 of the NTA; (ii) the application is for a determination of native title in relation to an area in which there has been no approved determination of native title: s 13(1)(a); and (iii) the s 87 agreement filed by the parties complies with ss 94A and 225 of the NTA: s 87(2). 41 I consider that it is appropriate that the Court make a determination in terms of the parties' agreement because: (a) All but one party is legally represented, and I am satisfied that the party who is not legally represented has consented knowing the evidence and the terms of the proposed determination; (b) the State of Queensland, acting on behalf of the community generally, has played an active role in the negotiation of the proposed determination and is satisfied that the determination is justified in all the circumstances; and (c) the parties have agreed upon the nature and extent of native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area.
Prescribed Body Corporate 42 Section 55 of the NTA requires the Court to make such determinations as are required by ss 56 and 57 at the same time as or as soon as practicable after the determination. Order 15 of the s 87 agreement signed by the parties seeks a determination that the Gunggari Native Title Aboriginal Corporation is to be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of ss 56(2)(b) and 56(3) of the NTA to perform the functions set out in s 57(1). 43 The nomination is supported by the affidavit of Rebecca Guppy-Coles affirmed on 22 October 2014, which deposes that on 16 October 2014, Ms Reeghan Finlay, a Gunggari person and member of the applicant, formally nominated the Gunggari Aboriginal Corporation to be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of s 56(2)(a) of the NTA. Ms Guppy-Coles further deposes that the Gunggari Aboriginal Corporation has consented to such nomination. 44 Accordingly, the Court determines that the Gunggari Aboriginal Corporation is to be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of s 56(1) of the NTA. 45 For the reasons outlined above, I will make orders in terms of the agreement reached by the parties. I certify that the preceding forty-five (45) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Rangiah.
Foster on behalf of the Gunggari People #3
State of Queensland