50 In presently relevant respects, the Agreement contained the following provisions -
+ ACS was to supply the service in accordance with the specification set out in the Agreement which, as to refuse removal, required strict adherence to Westfield's Waste Management Principles including mall bins to be emptied by ACS only into the compactors: cl 3.1(a) and para 1.5.4 of Sch 2.
+ ACS was to act in a good and workmanlike manner and in conformity with all reasonable directions from Westfield: cl 3.1(b).
+ ACS was to act in strict compliance with all applicable laws: cl 3.1(c).
+ ACS was to furnish all labour, materials, supplies, equipment, services, machinery, tools and other facilities required for the prompt and efficient supply of the service: cl 3.3.
+ Where ACS was required to provide or utilise equipment, such equipment was to be suitable for the service and was to be maintained by it in good, safe and working condition in accordance with the highest industry standards: cl 3.4.
+ ACS warranted that it and its employees were competent with the necessary skills and had received all necessary training to provide the service to the highest industry standards: cl 3.5.
+ The contract price included all labour, materials and equipment furnished by ACS for the supply of the service: cl 5.2(a).
+ Where any breach of the Agreement by ACS threatened the health or safety of any person, Westfield may take all action reasonably necessary to rectify the breach: cl 7.8.
+ ACS agreed to indemnify Westfield from and against "all claims, demands, writs, summons, actions, suits, proceedings, judgments, orders, decrees, costs, losses and expenses of any nature … in relation to any … personal injury … arising from or out of any act, omission or negligence of [ACS], or any of its employees, … including any breach of this Agreement …": cl 9.
+ As to environmental, health and safety requirements (EH&S), ACS was to ensure no risk to all persons employed by it in connection with its activities at the centre: cl 14.1(a).
+ ACS was to comply with the EH&S requirements set out in Sch 5 to the Agreement: cl 14.1(c).
+ ACS, even though Westfield would co-ordinate the overall activities relating to the Centre, had the EH&S responsibility relating to its personnel by its act or omission or arising from the works and was to exercise all necessary precautions for the protection of all persons at the workplace: paras 1.1 and 1.2 of Sch 5.
+ ACS was to lay down EH&S procedures for the instruction and training of its employees and provide supervision to ensure workplace safety: para 3.1 of Sch 5.
+ ACS was to ensure its employees did not undertake work activities detrimental to their health, safety or welfare: para 4.1 of Sch 5.
+ ACS was to design and construct means for carrying out the works sufficient in all respects to support the working load on the equipment used: para 4.2 of Sch 5.
+ ACS was to ensure that any plant and/or equipment complies with the relevant requirements (see para 2.1 of Sch 5) and is fit for the intended use: para 4.3 of Sch 5.
+ If an event occurs at the workplace which temporarily or permanently alters a person's future, ACS was to immediately provide Westfield with a description of the events and details of injuries to any person, including a written report within 24 hours: paras 8.1 and 8.2of Sch 5.
+ ACS was to ensure its employees completed training in and were conversant with the safe and correct use, handling and operation of materials and equipment: para 10.1 of Sch 5.
+ ACS was to indemnify Westfield against "all costs, losses, damages or penalties … as a result of a civil claim … arising out of or in connection with a breach by ACS of any of its obligations: para 14.2(b).
+ The Agreement was personal to ACS and ACS was not to assign its rights and interest thereunder without the prior written consent of Westfield: cl 15.1.