The applicants' submissions
41 The applicants submitted that the Urbanest premises are "commercial residential premises" because they are similar to a hotel, motel, inn, hostel or boarding house. It followed, according to the applicants, that each of the four supplies in relation to which declarations are sought was a supply of commercial residential premises or, at least, a supply of accommodation in commercial residential premises to an individual by an entity that owns or controls the commercial residential premises. Hence, it is the applicants' case that if the Urbanest premises, considered as a whole, constitute commercial residential premises, then not only is the supply of these premises by NSUT to USLT a taxable supply, so is each of the other supplies involving the shared apartments occupied by Mr O'Leary and Ms Guiloff and the studio apartment occupied by Mr Chairatna. In this regard, the applicants' submission focuses on the language of the definition of commercial residential premises in s 195-1 and the words appearing in parenthesis in s 40-35(1)(a).
42 The applicants primarily rely upon the following attributes in support of their submission that the Urbanest premises are commercial residential premises that are similar to a hotel, motel, inn, hostel or boarding house:
The premises are centrally controlled and managed by USLT;
The premises are operated by USLT as a commercial venture and with a view to making a profit;
The premises are configured for multiple occupancy;
The premises include a reception desk which operates 24 hours a day that provides services similar to those often provided by the reception desk or the concierge's desk of a hotel;
The premises include common areas consisting of a communal eating area, study area, a games room, a library and other recreational space and facilities similar to those often found in a hostel or boarding house;
The premises are held out to the public as accommodation available for rent;
The apartments within the premises are fully furnished.
43 The applicants relied upon the judgment of Greenwood J in Meridien Marinas Horizon Shores Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 74 ATR 787, [2009] FCA 1594. In that case his Honour was concerned with the supply of marina berths which, according to the taxpayer in that case, attracted the application of Div 87. In the context of the definition of the expression "commercial accommodation" in s 87-15 (which refers to the "right to occupy the whole or any part of commercial residential premises") his Honour observed (at para [74]):
The right to occupy, however, is necessarily given meaning by the context in which the definition operates, in conjunction with the other defined terms within Div 87 and the GST Act more generally. The right to occupy the whole or any part of the marina or any other premises falling within the definition of commercial residential premises is not a right to occupy at large, for the purposes of the definition of "commercial accommodation", in a way divorced from any corresponding purpose serving the statutory objectives of Div 87. Division 87 is directed to long-term accommodation in commercial residential premises which exhibit particular characteristics (normally, premises run by a controller for a commercial purpose; premises having multiple occupancy; premises so held out to the public; premises having central management; premises providing services in addition to commercial accommodation; and, premises normally used for the main purpose of accommodation).
44 His Honour's observations as to the particular characteristics normally exhibited by commercial residential premises pick up some of the indicia identified in the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (2006 Measures No. 3) Bill 2006 and the New Business Tax System (Untainting Tax) Bill 2006. The Explanatory Memorandum explained how amendments to (inter alia) the definition of "residential premises" (the 2006 amendments) were intended to reverse aspects of the decision of the Full Court in Marana Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 141 FCR 299, [2004] FCAFC 307.
45 In Marana the Full Court took the view that the words "reside" and "residence" implied a permanent or long-term commitment to dwelling in a particular place. The 2006 amendments (inter alia) introduced the words that appear in parenthesis ("regardless of the term of the occupation or intended occupation") into the definition of "residential premises" in s 195-1. Most relevant for present purposes is the part of the Explanatory Memorandum which refers to the definition of "commercial residential premises" in s 195-1. The Explanatory Memorandum stated (at paras 15.5 and 15.12 - 15.16):
15.5 These amendments confirm the policy intent of the GST law. The continuation of input taxed treatment of supplies of affected premises represents a sound balance between taxing (and crediting) business inputs and ensuring that owners of residential premises do not have to concern themselves with the GST treatment of such premises.
…
Interaction between commercial residential premises and residential premises
15.12 These amendments do not change the definition of 'commercial residential premises'. The GST treatment of accommodation in hotels, motels, inns, hostels and similar premises which exhibit similar characteristics (which may include: being run with a commercial intention, having multiple occupancy, holding out to the public, being used for the main purpose of accommodation, having central management, being offered by management in its own right, providing services, and where individuals have the status of guests) is not altered.
15.13 Broadly, these amendments ensure that a sale of residential premises (other than new residential premises) comprising a strata titled unit in commercial residential premises, such as a hotel or motel, will be input taxed.
15.14 For example, a sale of one or several units in a hotel complex will not constitute a supply of commercial residential premises. This is because the sale of a single unit or several units in, for example, a hotel or motel is not a supply of a hotel or motel.
15.15 On the other hand, a sale or lease of, for example, the whole of a hotel complex will be a supply of commercial residential premises, whether or not the hotel complex is strata titled. Whether a sale or lease of anything less than the whole of a hotel complex (eg, not all of the rooms within the complex or not all of the hotel infrastructure such as lobby, kitchen or pool areas) would constitute a supply of commercial residential premises, will depend on the facts of each case.
15.16 However, a supply comprising only the accommodation units in a hotel complex, without other parts of the hotel, such as the reception, is not a supply of commercial residential premises. It is a supply of residential premises.
Example 15.3
Owner Pty Ltd developed a new serviced apartment complex which consists of 50 apartments, a reception area and conference facilities. Owner Pty Ltd has retained the complex for the purposes of leasing the entire complex to Proprietor Pty Ltd who will operate an accommodation business, which essentially is run as a hotel.
The apartments are offered to the public, by Proprietor Pty Ltd in its own right, for short-term stays. The apartments are used predominately for accommodation and include self contained kitchen and laundry facilities. Proprietor Pty Ltd provides room cleaning and other services to the guests.
In this example the supply of the complex by Owner Pty Ltd to Proprietor Pty Ltd under the lease is similar to the supply of a hotel and is a supply of commercial residential premises.
The supply by Proprietor Pty Ltd when it supplies the apartments to the guests will also be taxable as a supply of accommodation in commercial residential premises to an individual by an entity that controls the commercial residential premises. The fact that the apartments may or may not be strata titled will not alter the conclusion in this example.