6 In concurrent dispute proceedings then before the Commission (Matter No IRC 2414 of 2008), an application was made by the Department under s 135(5) of the Act for the Commission to issue a certificate of attempted conciliation under s 135(2) of the Act. The Federation opposed the issuing of the certificate. The parties were heard in that respect.
7 On that day, the Commission issued a Statement in which the Commission concluded that, having regard to the negotiating positions of the parties at that time, there was no reasonable likelihood that the matters would be resolved by conciliation. That conclusion had some significance for the dispute proceedings. Section 135(6) of the Act required that, in those circumstances, a Certificate of Attempted Conciliation must be issued without delay. In fact, a Certificate was issued on 31 December 2008 and provision was made for, inter alia, the initiation and hearing of proceedings for dispute orders under Pt 2 of Ch 3 of the Act, (in view of the then impending industrial action by the Federation's members on 28 and 29 January 2009 and 4 and 5 February in the case of the Western Division of the Department's operations).
8 On 5 January 2009, the Department made an application for dispute orders which was heard before Marks J on 7 January. His Honour's decision in that matter is reserved at the time of the making of this Recommendation (the decision having been postponed in the light of further developments described below).
9 On 15 January 2009, the parties jointly approached the Commission to resume the conciliation proceedings in view of advancements upon the draft terms of settlement under discussion on 31 December 2008. The Commission agreed to that course and a date for resumption was fixed for today having regard to some intervening events, including a meeting of the Executive of the Federation. The Commission indicated that, upon resumption, it would consider the making of a Recommendation both as to the settlement of the substance of the parties' claims and, in conjunction, any remaining prospect of industrial action.
10 It has been unnecessary to further consider the question of industrial action, as the Federation announced yesterday that it would discontinue the proposed stoppage in view of the prospects for settlement.
11 After receiving submissions from Mr S Crawshaw SC, for the Federation, and Mr P Kite SC, for the Department, today I have formed the view that, despite significant progress by the parties in building upon the settlement terms under consideration on 31 December, the matter will not be resolved without further intervention by the Commission.
12 In my view, it is now appropriate to make a Recommendation for the resolution of the competing applications. The conciliation process has been exhaustive (now occurring over seven days). The Commission is fully appraised of the position adopted by each party in the conciliation process (and the basis for the view held by each party). There is a good prospect that the parties will now accept a Recommendation by the Commission arising out of the conciliation process. They have requested that the Commission issue a Recommendation.
13 In making a Recommendation in settlement of the respective claims of the parties, I have borne in mind the final bargaining position of the parties and what I consider represents a fair compromise of their respective claims. The Recommendation should do nothing to embarrass the positions adopted by either party in their formal applications and will provide a well deserved increase in salaries for teachers employed in the service of government schools and TAFE in this State. The outcome for wages and other conditions of employment is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the wage fixing principles as announced in the State Wage Case 2008 [2008] NSWIRComm 122.
14 The Recommendation does not wholly resolve all issues between the parties as to cost measures with respect to TAFE. However, the Recommendation provides for a procedure by which any such issues may be resolved.