© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2023] FCA 1114
Federal Court of Australia
2023-09-21
Rangiah J
Original judgment source is linked above.
THE COURT NOTES THAT: A. Having regard to the need to balance the limited availability of public resources with the competing need to resolve applications for a determination of native title in an efficient, cost effective and timely manner, the parties agree that the question of whether s 47C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) would apply to any park area within the External Boundary will be addressed after the matter has proceeded to determination. B. The Wakka Wakka People have indicated a desire to enter into negotiations with the State in relation to whether s 47C of the NTA would have application to any of the park areas in the Determination Area. C. Subject to paragraph D below, the parties agree that, if agreement is reached with the registered native title body corporate in accordance with s 47C(1)(b) of the NTA with respect to any of the park areas within the Determination Area, the parties would not oppose an application being brought by the registered native title body corporate, pursuant to ss 13(1)(b) and (5) of the NTA, to vary the determination in relation to each park area in relation to which agreement is reached regarding the application of s 47C of the NTA. D. The agreement of the parties in paragraph C above not to oppose an application to vary the determination in relation to a park area is subject to the parties having reached agreement on the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests that would be determined to exist in relation to each park area. BEING SATISFIED that an order in the terms set out below is within the power of the Court, and it appearing appropriate to the Court to do so, pursuant to s 87A of the NTA.
Other words and expressions used in this determination have the same meanings as they have in Part 15 of the NTA.
Then easterly to a point on a ridgeline north of Chapman Creek at Longitude 151.479057° East, Latitude 25.352958° South, then generally south easterly along that ridgeline passing through Longitude 151.481245° East, Latitude 25.355335° South to its highest point at Longitude 151.491554° East, Latitude 25.357262° South; then south-easterly to a prominent knoll east of Reid Creek and Mungy Road at Longitude 151.538752° East, Latitude 25.374980° South; then easterly to a point on a ridgeline east of Mondure Creek at Longitude 151.597415° East, Latitude 25.372917° South; then generally easterly and generally south-easterly along that ridgeline passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude East Latitude South 151.600148 25.373248 151.601225 25.371343 151.602550 25.369935 151.604041 25.368775 151.606443 25.369521 151.608845 25.369769 151.610585 25.372254 151.613051 25.375361 151.614727 25.374242 151.615559 25.375077 151.616154 25.376802 151.618355 25.377694 151.618772 25.379300 151.620080 25.378824 151.622460 25.380371 151.624006 25.381382 151.625731 25.381144 151.627397 25.379241 151.631502 25.380311 151.632572 25.380787 151.634298 25.379776 151.635368 25.378646 151.636261 25.377694 151.638164 25.379241 151.639532 25.380966 151.641495 25.380906 151.643458 25.381620 151.644529 25.384059 151.645005 25.385963 151.645184 25.387807 151.647104 25.389478 151.648152 25.392542 151.648636 25.395364 151.649523 25.396654 151.652587 25.397218 151.655650 25.398427 151.659198 25.400040 151.660810 25.400927 151.661697 25.402297 151.662100 25.403829
Then north-easterly to a point on the southern bank of the Burnett River at Longitude 151.689797° East; then generally southerly along banks of that river to its intersection with the northern boundary of the Barker & Barambah Creeks Sub Basin Catchment Area, southern boundary of the Lower Burnett River Sub-Basin Catchment Area at Latitude 25.573610° South; then generally westerly and generally southerly along boundaries of that catchment to again the eastern bank of the Burnett River at Latitude 25.575854° South; then generally southerly, and generally westerly, again generally southerly and generally westerly along eastern and southern banks of that river to its intersection with the northern boundary of the Boyne & Auburn Rivers Sub-Basin Catchment Area, southern boundary of the Lower Burnett River Sub-Basin Catchment Area at Latitude 25.630776° South; then generally westerly and generally south-westerly along boundaries of that catchment to Longitude 151.224701° East; then south-westerly to the intersection with the western bank of the Boyne River and the southern bank of the Burnett River at Longitude 151.224068° East, then generally westerly, generally northerly and generally easterly along southern, western and northern banks of that River back to the commencement point. Note: The external boundary description does not include land and waters within the external boundaries of the following: • QUD6026/2001 Bailai, Gurang, Gooreng Gooreng, Taribelang Bunda People as determined by the Federal Court 28 November 2017. • QUD31/2019 Auburn Hawkwood People as determined by the Federal Court 5 November 2019. • QUD276/2019 Wakka Wakka People #3 - Part A and B as determined by the Federal Court 12 April 2022. • QUD277/2019 Wakka Wakka People #4 - Part A as determined by the Federal Court 12 April 2022. Data Reference and Source • External boundary compiled by QSNTS, based in part on data sourced from the Commonwealth of Australia, NNTT (February 2023). • Cadastral data sourced from State of Queensland, Department of Resources (February 2023). • Where available watercourse boundaries were derived from Cadastral data or 1:250K Topographic Vector Data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) 2008. • Catchment boundaries sourced from Drainage Basin Sub Areas - Queensland sourced from State of Queensland, Department of Resources (October 2022). • Local Government Boundaries sourced State of Queensland, Department of Resources (February 2023). • That part of the northern boundary between the Lower Burnett River Sub-Basin Catchment boundary at Longitude 151.399337° East and a point on the southern bank of the Burnett River at Longitude 151.689797° East is based on Betsy's Country within Wakka Wakka People #4 external boundary description complied by the Commonwealth of Australia, NNTT (April 2019) on information or instructions provided by former Federal Court Justice John Mansfield and Kim McCaul. Topographic features in this part of the description sourced from QldMap Topo service, which is based on data acquired and collated by the State of Queensland, Department of Resources (November 2017). Reference datum Geographical coordinates referenced to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 2020 (GDA2020), in decimal degrees. Use of Coordinates Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome of the custodians of cadastral and topographic data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey. SCHEDULE 4 DESCRIPTION OF DETERMINATION AREA The determination area comprises all of the land and waters described by lots on plan, or relevant parts thereof, described in the first column of the tables in the Parts immediately below, and depicted in the maps in Schedule 6, to the extent those areas are within the External Boundary and not otherwise excluded by the terms of Schedule 5. Part 1 - Exclusive Areas All of the land and waters described in the following table and depicted in dark blue on the determination map contained in Schedule 6: Area description (at the time of the determination) Determination Note Map Sheet Reference Lot 1 on Plan AP13797 1, 3 + Lot 2 on Plan AP13797 1, 3 + Lot 78 on Plan AP17906 3 Lot 29 on Plan AP17911 18 Lot 29 on Plan AP22956 1 Lot 205 on Plan AP22960 14 * Lot 32 on Plan BON137 23 Lot 41 on Plan BON335 25 * Lot 274 on Plan BON335 25 * Lot 249 on Plan BON570 19 * Lot 37 on Plan BON706 29 * Lot 132 on Plan CP827074 16 * Lot 508 on Plan E3702 5 * Lot 2 on Plan E37018 5 That part of Lot 1 on Plan E37025 excluding former Allotment 9 on Plan E37018 5 Lot 35 on Plan G1316 31 Lot 36 on Plan G1316 31 Lot 41 on Plan G1316 31 Lot 56 on Plan G1316 31 Lot 35 on Plan M5830 15 * Lot 36 on Plan M5830 15 * Lot 46 on Plan M5830 15 * Lot 47 on Plan M5830 15 * Lot 48 on Plan M5830 15 * Lot 11 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 12 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 13 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 14 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 15 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 16 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 17 on Plan M5844 15 * Lot 1 on Plan MPH2070 5 ~ Lot 1 on Plan MPH2135 6 * Lot 1 on Plan MPH2141 6 * Lot 1 on Plan MPH2157 6 * Lot 1 on Plan MPH2179 5 * Lot 1 on Plan MPH22593 4 * Lot 5 on Plan MPH22656 8 Lot 4 on Plan MPH22693 7 Lot 2 on Plan MPH22712 8 Lot 8 on Plan MPH22723 6 Lot 2 on Plan MPH22747 3, 6 * Lot 3 on Plan MPH22747 6 Lot 3 on Plan MPH22789 6 * Lot 4 on Plan MPH22789 6 * Lot 5 on Plan MPH22789 6 * Lot 6 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 7 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 8 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 11 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 12 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 13 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 14 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 15 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 16 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 17 on Plan MPH30095 6 * Lot 2 on Plan RP210873 27 * Lot 2 on Plan RP210875 26 * Lot 165 on Plan USL46555 7 Lot 131 on Plan USL46558 4 Lot 135 on Plan USL46558 4 Lot 71 on Plan USL46567 7 Lot 73 on Plan USL46567 7 Lot 75 on Plan USL46567 7 Lot 94 on Plan USL46581 4 Lot 61 on Plan YL330 9 * Lot 63 on Plan YL693 9 * Lot 153 on Plan YL850 5 * Lot 128 on Plan YL988 3
~ denotes areas to which s 47A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) applies.
Lot 69 on Plan YL1029 1 Lot 136 on Plan YL1029 1 Lot 141 on Plan YL1050 6 Lot 8 on Plan YL1064 14 Lot 2 on Plan YL1086 6 Lot 91 on Plan YL836027 10 Save for any waters forming part of a lot on plan, all rivers, creeks, streams and lakes within the External Boundary described in Schedule 3, including but not limited to: 1, 3-5, 7-14, 17-19, 21-31 • Burnett River; • Harkness Boundary Creek; • McCord Creek; • Alma Creek; • O'Bil Bil Creek; • Branch Creek; • Reids Creek; • Tarrara Creek; • Pumpkin Hut Creek; • Philpott Creek; • Gully abutting Lots 131 and 135 on Plan USL46558; and • Lagoon.
SCHEDULE 5 AREAS NOT FORMING PART OF THE DETERMINATION AREA The following areas of land and waters are excluded from the determination area as described in Part 1 of Schedule 4 and Part 2 of Schedule 4:
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT The Native Title Act [7] The application [13] The agreement reached between the parties [29] Prescribed Body Corporate [36] Conclusion [40]
RANGIAH J: 1 The applicant seeks a determination of native title pursuant to ss 61 and 225 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the Act) on behalf of the Wakka Wakka People. 2 On 13 October 2017, the Court made orders to administratively partition the application into two parts, Part A and Part B. On 1 November 2021, Part A and Part B were further divided to create Part C. 3 A consent determination of native title was made in relation to Part A at Cherbourg on 12 April 2022. 4 The parties have now indicated their consent to a determination that the Wakka Wakka People hold native title rights and interests in Part B of the claim area. 5 Part B covers the area set out at Order 5 of the Orders. It encompasses approximately 8,923 ha of land and waters in south-east Queensland, including the towns of Eidsvold, Mundubbera, Ideraway and Gayndah. 6 The Court is satisfied, for the reasons below, that it is within the power of the Court to make the orders sought, and that it is appropriate to do so.
The Native Title Act 7 The preamble to the Act recognises, on behalf of all people of Australia, that the Aboriginal peoples of Australia inhabited the country prior to European settlement and that the Aboriginal peoples were progressively dispossessed of their lands. It records that the Constitution was amended, by the overwhelming vote of the people of Australia, to enable laws such as the Act to be passed and to facilitate recognition by our shared legal system of native title rights and interests. 8 Section 3 of the Act outlines the main objects of the Act as being: to protect and recognise native title, to establish ways in which future dealings affecting native title may proceed and to set the standard for those dealings, to establish a mechanism for determining claims to native title and to provide for, or permit, the validation of past acts, and intermediate period acts, invalidated because of the existence of native title. 9 Section 87A of the Act provides a mechanism for achieving a key objective of the Act, the resolution of claims for native title by agreement. The agreement of the parties to the terms of the proposed orders is consistent with that objective. 10 Section 61 of the Act provides that an application for a determination of native title may be made by a person or persons authorised by all the persons who, according to their traditional laws and customs, hold the common or group rights and interests comprising the particular native title claimed. 11 Native title is defined in s 223(1) of the Act as follows: Common law rights and interests (1) The expression native title or native title rights and interests means the communal, group or individual rights and interests of Aboriginal peoples or Torres Strait Islanders in relation to land or waters, where: (a) the rights and interests are possessed under the traditional laws acknowledged, and the traditional customs observed, by the Aboriginal peoples or Torres Strait Islanders; and (b) the Aboriginal peoples or Torres Strait Islanders, by those laws and customs, have a connection with the land or waters; and (c) the rights and interests are recognised by the common law of Australia. 12 Section 225 of the Act describes what is meant by a "determination of native title": A determination of native title is a determination whether or not native title exists in relation to a particular area (the determination area) of land or waters and, if it does exist, a determination of: (a) who the persons, or each group of persons, holding the common or group rights comprising the native title are; and (b) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area; and (c) the nature and extent of any other interests in relation to the determination area; and(d) the relationship between the rights and interests in paragraphs (b) and (c) (taking into account the effect of this Act); and (e) to the extent that the land or waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease - whether the native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or waters on the native title holders to the exclusion of all others. …
The application 13 The application for a determination of native title was filed in the Federal Court on 10 February 2012. 14 On 13 October 2017, application was separated, by order of the Court, into Part A (the area uncontested by the Indigenous respondent parties) and Part B (the area contested by the Indigenous respondent parties). On 2 November 2021, I ordered that the application be further divided to incorporate Part C, which comprises areas the subject of Crown-to-Crown grants that are subject to further negotiations between the applicant and the State of Queensland. 15 The applicant now seeks determination on behalf of the Wakka Wakka People over land and waters within Part B. 16 The persons comprising the applicant are: Florence Bell, Michael Bond (Snr), Patricia Bond, James Chapman, Gary Cobbo, Marissa Cobbo, Robert Lacey, Stephen Pickering, Carl Simpson, Cheryl Smith, Sidney Smith, Katrina Watson, Robert West, Edwin James MiMi, Irene Simpson and Shane Dynevor (Jnr). 17 The respondents to the application are: the State of Queensland, the Commonwealth of Australia, North Burnett Regional Council, Telstra Corporation Limited, Amplitel Pty Ltd, Burnett Water Pty Ltd, and Ergon Energy Corporation Limited. 18 All parties to the application have reached agreement that native title exists in Part B and as to the nature and extent of those native title rights and interests. That agreement, made under s 87A(1)(b) of the Act, was filed in the Federal Court on 8 August 2023. 19 The evidence of connection filed by the applicant primarily includes claimant evidence in the form of affidavits and witness statements; and two expert reports prepared by anthropologist Dr Kingsley Palmer. 20 It is appropriate to record that the parties were assisted in resolving aspects of the claim by the provision of a joint expert report prepared by the Honourable John Mansfield AM QC and Mr Kim McCaul. 21 The evidence of members of the native title claim group about their traditional laws and customs and rights and responsibilities in respect to land and waters is of the highest importance: Sampi v Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 at [48]. The claimant evidence of connection is comprised of 27 affidavits and witness statements of the following persons: Statement of Patricia Dawn Bond dated 10 August 2016 Statement of Robert George Lacey dated 2 September 2016 Statement of Loretta May Chapman dated 25 July 2016 Statement of Yvonne Frances Chapman dated 26 July 2016 Statement of Clem Michael Shadford dated 30 September 2016 Statement of Robert West dated 1 September 2016 Statement of Glenys Fredericksen dated 5 October 2016 Statement of Margaret Kay MiMi dated 3 July 2016 Statement of Rodney Samuel Hill dated 2 July 2016 Affidavit of Selina Hill dated 14 March 2015 Statement of John Wragge dated 18 August 2016 Statement of Robert Alan Bond dated 6 August 2016 Statement of Lance Bligh dated 27 September 2016 Statement of Cynthia Button dated 9 August 2016 Statement of William (Billy) Button dated 9 August 2016 Affidavit of Thomas Daniels dated 30 April 2014 Affidavit of Fred Cobbo dated 28 March 2014 Affidavit of Beryl Gambrill (dec) dated 16 June 2012 Statement of Arnold Murray dated 16 September 2016 Statement of Terry Willmot Snr dated 19 August 2016 Statement of Edward MiMi dated 15 February 2019 Statement of Melissa Bond dated 3 February 2019 Statement of Oriel Chambers dated 7 November 2022 Statement of John Wragge dated 8 November 2022 Statement of Una Appo dated 11 November 2022 Statement of Arnold Johnny Collins dated 10 November 2022 Statement of Eddie MiMi dated 12 November 2022. 22 The applicant also relies on the following reports prepared by anthropologist Dr Kingsley Palmer: Wakka Wakka Native Title Application QUD6032/1999 QC99/33 - Anthropologist's Report (March 2010) ("Connection Report"); and Wakka Wakka People #4 QUD91/2012 and Wakka Wakka People #5 QUD93/2012 Native Title Applications - Anthropologist's Responsive Report (May 2014) ("Supplementary Connection Report"). 23 The applicant's connection materials also include a genealogical report prepared by Anthony Eales, a Research Officer at QSNTS: Wakka Wakka People #4 QUD91/2012 and Wakka Wakka People #5 QUD93/2012 Native Title Applications - Genealogical Responsive Report (May 2014). 24 In the Connection Report, Dr Palmer considers there to be "a substantial continuity of law and custom" that, "can reasonably be supposed to extend back to the time of sovereignty within the application area". Dr Palmer also concludes: Wakka Wakka society, as it is observable today, is based upon and is rooted in a customary system which is likely to have been in operation at the time of sovereignty. 25 Dr Palmer observes that the Wakka Wakka People have continued to observe customary ritual practices, which have been handed down to the present generation by their forebears, including with respect to totemic and spiritual beliefs, sites, bush tucker, dispute resolution and decision making, as well as a common understanding that members of the Wakka Wakka society shared a common language style, typified by a shared term for the word "no". 26 Dr Palmer concludes that there is substantial continuity of the laws and customs that have been observed and practiced by Wakka Wakka People that can reasonably be supposed to extend back to the time of sovereignty within the claim area. 27 The Wakka Wakka People are the descendants of the following persons: Jenny Carlo and David Carlo (parents of Princess Carlo); Minnie Bly (mother of Thomas Simpson), Ethel and Bill Button (father of Ethel Button); Mother of Maggie Hart (grandmother of Crabbie Chapman and Henry Hart); Mother of Willie Boy Pickering; King Billy and Maria of Boondooma (parents of Tommy Dodd of Taabinga); Maggie West; Kitty of Boonara; MiMi; Kitty (mother of Jack Bulong); John Bond; Kitty (mother of Jenny Lind), Jenny Lind and Mick Buck; Boubijan Cobbo; Stockman Bligh and Aggie Bligh; Tommy (aka Boondoon) and Maggie (parents of Willie Bone), Billy McKenzie (father of Chlorine McKenzie), Chlorine McKenzie; Kate/Katie/Kitty Law; Emily of Degilbo (mother of Annie); Taabinga Harry. 28 The evidence filed, including Dr Palmer's anthropological reports and the witness statements and affidavits provided by the claimants, provide cogent evidence of the continuity of the traditional laws and customs of the Wakka Wakka People extending back to before the time of sovereignty. The evidence supports the claim that the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed give the Wakka Wakka People the rights and interests set out in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Orders.
The agreement reached between the parties 29 Section 87A(4) of the Act gives the Court the power to make an order consistent with the terms of a proposed determination of native title agreed between the parties to the proceeding without holding a hearing in relation to the application if the Court considers that: an order in, or consistent with, the terms of the proposed determination would be within its power; and it would be appropriate to do so. 30 The conditions under s 87A of the Act that enable the Court to make the determination without a hearing are: There is a proceeding in relation to an application for a determination of native title: s 87A(1)(a); At any stage of the proceeding after the end of the period specified in the notice given under s 66 of the Act, agreement is reached on a proposed determination of native title in relation to an area that is part of, but not all of, the area covered by the application: s 87A(1)(b); Certain persons are parties to the agreement, including "each person who holds an interest in relation to the land or waters in any part of the determination area at the time the agreement is made, and who is a party to the proceeding at the time the agreement is made": s 87A(1)(c); The terms of the proposed determination are in writing and signed by or on behalf of those parties: s 87A(1)(d); The court is satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, the terms of the proposed determination, would be within its power and the court considers it appropriate to make the orders sought: s 87A(4). 31 In considering whether it is appropriate to make the orders sought, the Court's role is confined to considering the evidence filed for the purpose of determining whether the parties have entered into an agreement that has been freely made on an informed basis: Nangkiriny (on behalf of the Karajarri People) v State of Western Australia (2002) 117 FCR 6 at [14]. The Court is not required to make a judicial determination of the merits of the claim: Button (on behalf of the Koa People) v State of Queensland [2021] FCA 1190 at [5]. In considering the appropriateness of the orders, the Court is directed to consider whether the parties to the agreement have acted rationally and in good faith: Munn (for and on behalf of the Gunggari People) v State of Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 at [30]. 32 The Court is satisfied that the parties to the s 87A agreement have entered into the agreement freely on an informed basis and have acted in good faith. The State of Queensland is satisfied that the claim group is an appropriate one to be recognised as holders of native title rights and interests, that it is appropriate to recognise the rights and interests proposed and that it is appropriate for the State to enter into the determination. I am also satisfied that the State has taken a "real interest" in the proceeding on behalf of the broader community, demonstrated in particular by the steps taken by the State to thoroughly review the applicant's connection material and request further evidence as it considered was required: cf Munn at [29]. 33 The requirements of the Act have been satisfied: There is a proceeding in relation to an application for a determination of native title: s 87A(1)(a). The period for notification of the application under s 66 of the Act has ended, and the parties to the proposed determination have recorded their agreement as to the terms of a determination of native title in relation to Part B of the application area: s 87A(1)(b) and (c). The Court is satisfied that the Commonwealth (the second respondent) does not hold interests in Part B of the claim and is not required to be party to the agreement. The parties to the proposed determination have recorded their agreement in a signed Minute of Consent: s 87A(1)(d). An order in terms of the Minute or consistent with the Minute would be within the Court's power because: • The application has been made in accordance with s 61 of the Act; • The application is for a determination of native title in relation to an area for which there are no other approved determinations of native title: s 13(1)(a); and • the Minute agreed to by the parties complies with ss 94A and 225 of the Act: s 87A(4). 34 In addition, it is appropriate for the Court to make the orders sought because: The parties have freely entered into the agreement on an informed basis, having had the opportunity to consider and assess the evidence relied upon by the applicant. The parties have agreed as to the nature and extent of rights and interests, and the proposed determination is unambiguous and certain as to the rights and interests declared. There are no proceedings before the Court relating to native title determination applications that cover any part of the area that is the subject of this application. 35 The terms of the proposed determination also satisfy the requirements of s 225 of the Act.
Prescribed Body Corporate 36 Section 55 of the Act relevantly provides that if the Federal Court proposes to make an approved determination of native title, and the determination is that native title exists at the time of making the determination, the Federal Court must, at the same time or as soon as practicable after it makes the determination, make a determination under ss 56 and 57 of the Act. 37 Section 56(1) of the Act requires that the Court must determine whether the native title is to be held in trust, and if so, by whom. The applicant has consented to orders determining that the native title is to be held in trust. The applicant seeks orders that the Wakka Wakka Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (ICN: 8903) is to be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of ss 56(2)(b) and 56(3) of the Act. The applicant relies on an affidavit of Lillian Youels which annexures a copy of a letter from Robert West, a Wakka Wakka Person and a member of the applicant claim group, formally nominating the Wakka Wakka Native Title Aboriginal Corporation as the prescribed body corporate. 38 I am satisfied that the Wakka Wakka Native Title Aboriginal Corporation is a prescribed body corporate within reg 4 of the Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth). 39 It is appropriate to determine that the Wakka Wakka Native Title Aboriginal Corporation is to be the prescribed body corporate for the purpose of s 57 of the Act and perform the functions prescribed in s 57(3) of the Act.
Conclusion 40 The Court will make orders in accordance with the orders agreed by the parties. I certify that the preceding forty (40) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Rangiah.
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES QUD 277 of 2019 Respondents Fourth Respondent: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED Fifth Respondent: AMPLITEL PTY LTD (AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE TOWERS BUSINESS OPERATING TRUST ABN 75 357 171 746) Sixth Respondent: BURNETT WATER PTY LTD Seventh Respondent: ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED
Bell on behalf of the Wakka Wakka People #4
State of Queensland