Axiom88 Pty Ltd ATF Axiom88 Trust v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
[2023] NSWCATAD 252
At a glance
Source factsCourt
NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity
Decision date
2022-07-12
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (20 paragraphs)
Reasons for decision
- This is an application by Axiom88 Pty Ltd, as trustee of the Axiom88 Trust (the Applicant), seeking review of the surcharge land tax assessment (the assessment) of the respondent, the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Chief Commissioner), for the 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 land tax years. That assessment was issued on 11 February 2021. The assessment relates to residential land of which the Applicant is the registered owner. That land is also used and occupied by Celine Liu Taylor and Edwin Taylor as their principal place of residence.
- There is no dispute that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the assessments of the Chief Commissioner: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) (ADR Act), ss 7 and 9 and Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) (TA Act), ss 96 and 99(1).
- The role of the Tribunal is to decide the correct and preferable decision having regard to the material before it and the applicable law: ADR Act s 63(1).
- In this application, the onus is on the Applicant to prove its case: TA Act s 100(3). In this regard the Applicant contends that it is not liable for surcharge land tax for the 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 land tax years as: 1. the nominated beneficiaries in the Axiom88 Trust Deed do not fall within the categories of 'foreign person' as contained in s 2A of the Land Tax Act 1956 (NSW) (LT Act); 2. the land assessed for surcharge land tax is exempt from land tax as it is an Australian corporation entitled to a refund of an amount of surcharge land tax paid by the corporation under s 5C of the LT Act; and 3. in the alternative, in the circumstances where the Axiom88 Trust Deed was amended not long after the 31 December 2020 date and it was accepted by the Chief Commissioner for subsequent years, it is unfair and unjust to make the Applicant liable for surcharge land tax.
- The Chief Commissioner has at all times contended that the Applicant is liable for surcharge land tax as, the Applicant was, during the relevant land tax years, a 'foreign person' for the purposes of s 5D of the LT Act.