"HIS HONOUR: Now, that's done. Do you wish to give further evidence, or are you content now for Mr Langmead to cross-examine you?---Yes. I say that I have been fallen a victim of miscarriage of justice.
Mr Vasiliou, it may be said against you in due course that even if I was to accept all of that, what the email you sent which is the one you sent to Justice Vickery that we all know this case is about, that constitutes a contempt, and it might be said against you that even if I accepted everything you said that you have been the subject of a bad miscarriage of justice, it's still a contempt of court to write such an email?---No, I don't agree with Your Honour. What I submit is there is no court, there is no judges in this court, it's only the building. The only thing truthful about this place here is the buildings. Everything else is fake. Everything else is criminal. Everything else it's not run in accordance with the law. And the law, Your Honour, the power of the law, and the way you administer the law is totally different what is happening here today. I found it totally unacceptable for certain behaviour to be carried out by the judges and leaving the judges alone which they can do whatever they feel like it, and there's nobody else to give account for is, I'm worried about the officers of the court that prevents the course of natural justice and prevents the course of real justice being delivered to me and my family, protection for my assets, my properties, of my family and everything that sits on this land, that it's been ransack, salvage, and it come to the stage that I can't even think that all those assets that took 45 years to establish has vanished overnight due to criminal activity involving the judges themselves. And I am sorry to say that, but when we do a court case, when we go do a hearing we have to somehow face the truth, however bitter it is, how terrible it is, you have to face the truth, you know, you can't just bypass the truth and pick on one person, 'Oh, he sent two emails,' or, 'He sent one email,' and that's - you breach the rules of the court, you do that, when the actual judges has acted inappropriately and caused all this problem. Now, you said earlier there was a question of law and has to be heard by a judge, alone, and all that sort of thing. It may be the case, but the behaviour of the judges, the way it's done, the frustrations that they put me through all these months by seeing the judges working on this case on my company behind the scenes in favour of these two people that you saw before here, giving them everything they want every time they ask, they giving them, charge, costs on indemnity basis, and that's very rare for the court to react that way, you know. So the situation is, if was supposed to be the case that the judge has to hear the case because you can't not get involved the jury, which is not true, in my submission, then the judge has to be clear about it, and say, look, 'Mr Vasiliou, unfortunately you asked for the jury, but we cannot provide the jury, because I have to do it myself' and all that. But for me to attend a court of law and I see the judge acting very weird and rushing things through, not taking any notice of new evidence that emerged in March April this year, or last year actually when the case was on, it had no relevance, even Justice Jessup's and Justice Weinberg's decision in the Federal Court, the court has to take into account the new evidence. So the judge on the day he acted improper, contempt his own court, in actual fact the judge should be charged for criminal offence, should be put in gaol. Now, who's going to charge him? There's nobody there to charge him. Who's going to charge him? Nobody's going to go near the judges. Who's going to tell the judges what to do? No one. There's nobody in Victoria that can charge judges for criminal offences, so the judges is the power, you know, like, they're like courts, standing on two feet and then they do whatever they feel like. Now, the issue here is this: there is no passage of the law that you have to by law weigh all the emails, all emails anybody sends to someone and if you send, for instance, 300 good letters and you send three not so good letters or unpleasant letters, then those three letters doesn't count. It has to be a continuation of three emails or letters, a continuation of such an offence in order for the court to take it into account, because when you writing emails you send submissions, and you seeing things done against you, improper things that should not happen, and then you can see your assets being savagely attacked by the people, and the court is behind them, and in that event, Your Honour, there's nothing left, there's no court, there's no respect by the judges themselves, by the staff of the court, and then the thing gets out of the way. So if when the Titanic sunk people used to break the doors and all that sort of thing trying to get out to save themselves, and some officers used to say, well, 'You break into the properties of Star Liner' or something, you know, in the movie, 'I want to report you to the captain,' but the people, the boat was sinking and the people rushing for their lives, they're not going to care about breaking the door or breaking the gate down or anything like this. So you cannot isolate and take a person from that ship and say, 'Well, I'm sorry, but you break the door of that Titanic and you have to charge and pay for it,' but the Titanic sunk, but doesn't matter if it sunk, you still committed the act of damaging somebody else's property, you know, so, you know, this is similar situation where I been constantly been abused by the court system for 15 years, and I wrote so many letters to Attorney-Generals, so many letters to Chief Justices, so many letters to everyone, and nobody, nobody cares. But when the others fear or receive something slightly not proper, they are rushed, and they get all the service and support and everything that they want, you know, without asking too much trouble, and nobody's there to protect me and my family, so in that circumstances you tend to get out of your way or turned out to be - do something that it might not be proper, but when other people are engaged in unconscionable conduct in lots of times, you report them to the police, you report them to the authorities and they don't do anything about it, and even themselves not correcting themselves out, then what else can I do? Now, I'm you, Your Honour, you're a judge and I'm not a judge, I'm a prisoner now, I'm asking you what would you do if somebody comes in and steal five properties of major value from you? Would you just say, 'Well, that doesn't matter, just let them go, it's okay.' Particularly when they break into my laboratory, professional laboratory without telling me and took all this equipment out, some of them were brand new in cellophane bags still, and they say there was no value into it, that's not true. There is so much values was in there that it could be sold, even a dollar each, please, or 50 cents is still value, it's still something, so Mr Marchesi has done a lot of criminal things to me, and Mr Lhuede, and he received a lot of support from the judges illegally. He's been involved, Mr Lhuede, with perjury. He got this lawyer to draw up the trust to give fake evidence in the second trial, which is totally different to the first evidence he gave before Justice Weinberg to win the case. Now, everybody was working, everybody's working together, everybody is there to destroy everything that stands out, and leave my children with nothing, and leave me with bitter, bitterness in my mouth - not for myself, I don't care, I'm happy where I am now, to stay in gaol forever, I don't care if I stay there for 500 years, you know, I set myself in there, everything's perfect, and I just live like at home there, it's just - in the beginning I was abused, I was put in refrigerations, I had heart attacks in the refrigerations that they put me in because my body froze and my blood could not circulate, they switch off the water for four days, they haven't feed me for four days, they have me nude in a one small room and with a huge air conditioning intentionally on top of my body, and they just left me in there, you know, or until I had a heart attack and all that, and they couldn't care less either, and I managed to survive myself, so all these criminal things against a person, just cannot be forgotten. And I don't care about Mr Marchesi, he can wear a nice tie and a suit, and whatever you can think of, but he's a criminal. He's a very, very big criminal man. Now, he managed to get a licence for a trustee. Now, it's a, he says, you know, he got a licence, he's proud of his licence and he mentioned it in his affidavit and that sort of thing, but he's a criminal person, the same as Mr Lhuede, he's a criminal lawyer. So - and what upsets me most is that all Mr Vickery or Justice Vickery sat on the case, he put a judgment against me and my wife and my company, that I could never ever initiate any proceedings in the Supreme Court unless I get court leave. Now, that's closing the door of justice, forever. Now, since he done that, I attempted to get leave from three different judges, and they all been refused, you know, so there's no avenue for me open now for the justice. I'm not going to get justice. I'm not going to get anything. So Justice Bell says to me, he says, 'Mr Vasiliou, you seem to be very successful person in your life, what happened to you?' You know, so I told him, 'That's because of corruption, because of the law is not followed, it's not respected by the court itself.' The law is straight-forward and is so clear, that if you follow the law correctly, nobody gets hurt and nobody loses anything. But if you take the law in your own hands that's when things go wrong. The law is a very, very fine machinery that had to be followed down to its detail. You know, I say that this contempt of court charge - I can't see where I contempted court. Now, if you say I sent emails with threaten words in there, I say that that's a communication emails. Now, maybe the court or the jury will see the emails when we get to the jury at the County Court as a threatening emails, but I say it wasn't, because I say, and I submit that it's better to send someone a warning email rather than killing, but if he insist to behave in a criminal way against the person, then the end thing is to kill him, and that's what's going to happen in the end. He's not going to get away, no one's going to get away with it, you know, I be ashamed to myself if I leave these people to take all my assets, sell them to belong to them and put in their pockets, and my kids is paying mortgages, 3 and $4,000 a month. I will not say any more than that, because this court, it's corrupt from the top to the bottom. There's no ethics in this court. There's no court. So I say that I'm not guilty of contempt of court because there is no court. There's no court. It's only the building, look at this beautiful building, magnificent, but that's all, we got the building and that's all we have, we haven't got courts, Your Honour. I say that I don't have anything to say against you, I know you put me in gaol, but I forgive you for that. It was very hard for me, you upset me a lot on the 2nd of March and I had a heart attack, the biggest hard attack I had in my life. I couldn't breathe for 24 hours and it was very painful, but apart from that, I don't have anything against you personally. And I want you to know that if I upset you in any way I apologise for that, and that's all I can say to you, because even the other day when I come to the hearing last week and I was a little bit sympathise about you, because I was a bit harsh on you and all that sort of thing, I asked you to step down and all that sort of thing, but I had my reasons, and I've lost a lot of money and I am going to get my money back, I'm going to get my five properties back, one way or another I am going to get my five properties back or else. Now, I suggest that you talk to your judges inside and work out a strategy how I'm going to get my five properties back."[48]