QLDIn ForceAct
Youth Justice Act 1992
sec.22When police officer may refer offence for restorative justice process
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.22
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Youth Justice Act 1992.
### sec.22 When police officer may refer offence for restorative justice process
This section applies if a child admits committing an offence to a police officer.
Instead of bringing the child before a court for the offence, the police officer may, by written notice given to the chief executive, refer the offence to the chief executive for a restorative justice process.
However, the police officer may make the referral only if—
the child indicates willingness to comply with the referral; and
having regard to the deciding factors, the officer considers—
a caution is inappropriate; and
a proceeding for the offence would be appropriate if the referral were not made; and
the referral is a more appropriate way of dealing with the offence than starting a proceeding.
The deciding factors for referring an offence to the chief executive for a restorative justice process are—
the nature of the offence; and
the harm suffered by anyone because of the offence; and
whether the interests of the community and the child would be served by having the offence dealt with under a restorative justice process.
The police officer must inform the child—
generally of the restorative justice process and potential consequences for the child of failing to properly participate in the process; and
that the making of a restorative justice agreement will form part of the child’s criminal history.
If the referral is accepted by the chief executive, the chief executive must give written notice of the acceptance to the police officer and the child.
s 22 sub 2002 No. 39 ss 7 , 9
amd 2012 No. 41 s 5
sub 2016 No. 39 s 13
amd 2024 No. 54 s 45
(sec.22-ssec.1) This section applies if a child admits committing an offence to a police officer.
(sec.22-ssec.2) Instead of bringing the child before a court for the offence, the police officer may, by written notice given to the chief executive, refer the offence to the chief executive for a restorative justice process.
(sec.22-ssec.3) However, the police officer may make the referral only if— the child indicates willingness to comply with the referral; and having regard to the deciding factors, the officer considers— a caution is inappropriate; and a proceeding for the offence would be appropriate if the referral were not made; and the referral is a more appropriate way of dealing with the offence than starting a proceeding.
(sec.22-ssec.4) The deciding factors for referring an offence to the chief executive for a restorative justice process are— the nature of the offence; and the harm suffered by anyone because of the offence; and whether the interests of the community and the child would be served by having the offence dealt with under a restorative justice process.
(sec.22-ssec.5) The police officer must inform the child— generally of the restorative justice process and potential consequences for the child of failing to properly participate in the process; and that the making of a restorative justice agreement will form part of the child’s criminal history.
(sec.22-ssec.6) If the referral is accepted by the chief executive, the chief executive must give written notice of the acceptance to the police officer and the child.
- (a) the child indicates willingness to comply with the referral; and
- (b) having regard to the deciding factors, the officer considers— (i) a caution is inappropriate; and (ii) a proceeding for the offence would be appropriate if the referral were not made; and (iii) the referral is a more appropriate way of dealing with the offence than starting a proceeding.
- (i) a caution is inappropriate; and
- (ii) a proceeding for the offence would be appropriate if the referral were not made; and
- (iii) the referral is a more appropriate way of dealing with the offence than starting a proceeding.
- (i) a caution is inappropriate; and
- (ii) a proceeding for the offence would be appropriate if the referral were not made; and
- (iii) the referral is a more appropriate way of dealing with the offence than starting a proceeding.
- (a) the nature of the offence; and
- (b) the harm suffered by anyone because of the offence; and
- (c) whether the interests of the community and the child would be served by having the offence dealt with under a restorative justice process.
- (a) generally of the restorative justice process and potential consequences for the child of failing to properly participate in the process; and
- (b) that the making of a restorative justice agreement will form part of the child’s criminal history.