QLDIn ForceAct
Vegetation Management Act 1999
sec.109Validation for reliance on particular maps
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.109
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Vegetation Management Act 1999.
### sec.109 Validation for reliance on particular maps
This section applies if, before the commencement of this section—
the chief executive—
assessed, as the assessment manager or a concurrence agency, a vegetation clearing application against a regional vegetation management code; or
assessed, as a concurrence agency, a concurrence agency application against a regional vegetation management code; and
the code referred to a document it called the ‘vegetation management watercourse map’; and
the chief executive, in assessing the application against the code, relied on the document; and
when the application was assessed, the document was known by any of the following names—
‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses Version 2.1’;
‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses 25K Version 2.1’;
‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 1 ’;
‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 2 ’.
The chief executive’s reliance on the document is taken to be, and always to have been, valid for assessing the application.
s 109 ins 2013 No. 23 s 225
(sec.109-ssec.1) This section applies if, before the commencement of this section— the chief executive— assessed, as the assessment manager or a concurrence agency, a vegetation clearing application against a regional vegetation management code; or assessed, as a concurrence agency, a concurrence agency application against a regional vegetation management code; and the code referred to a document it called the ‘vegetation management watercourse map’; and the chief executive, in assessing the application against the code, relied on the document; and when the application was assessed, the document was known by any of the following names— ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses Version 2.1’; ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses 25K Version 2.1’; ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 1 ’; ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 2 ’.
(sec.109-ssec.2) The chief executive’s reliance on the document is taken to be, and always to have been, valid for assessing the application.
- (a) the chief executive— (i) assessed, as the assessment manager or a concurrence agency, a vegetation clearing application against a regional vegetation management code; or (ii) assessed, as a concurrence agency, a concurrence agency application against a regional vegetation management code; and
- (i) assessed, as the assessment manager or a concurrence agency, a vegetation clearing application against a regional vegetation management code; or
- (ii) assessed, as a concurrence agency, a concurrence agency application against a regional vegetation management code; and
- (b) the code referred to a document it called the ‘vegetation management watercourse map’; and
- (c) the chief executive, in assessing the application against the code, relied on the document; and
- (d) when the application was assessed, the document was known by any of the following names— (i) ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses Version 2.1’; (ii) ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses 25K Version 2.1’; (iii) ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 1 ’; (iv) ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 2 ’.
- (i) ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses Version 2.1’;
- (ii) ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses 25K Version 2.1’;
- (iii) ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 1 ’;
- (iv) ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 2 ’.
- (i) assessed, as the assessment manager or a concurrence agency, a vegetation clearing application against a regional vegetation management code; or
- (ii) assessed, as a concurrence agency, a concurrence agency application against a regional vegetation management code; and
- (i) ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses Version 2.1’;
- (ii) ‘ Vegetation Management Act Remnant Watercourses 25K Version 2.1’;
- (iii) ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 1 ’;
- (iv) ‘Vegetation management watercourse map part 2 ’.