QLDIn ForceAct
Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Act 1995
sec.36Defences to discharge offence
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.36
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Act 1995.
### sec.36 Defences to discharge offence
Each of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence—
the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;
the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the noxious liquid substance;
the discharge was for the purpose of combating specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer.
See Annex II, regulation 3.
For subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is taken to be intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner, master or other member of the ship’s crew—
acted with intent to cause damage; or
acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.
s 36 amd 2001 No. 79 s 49 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch
(sec.36-ssec.1) Each of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence— the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea; the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the noxious liquid substance; the discharge was for the purpose of combating specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer. See Annex II, regulation 3.
(sec.36-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is taken to be intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner, master or other member of the ship’s crew— acted with intent to cause damage; or acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.
- (a) the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;
- (b) the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the noxious liquid substance;
- (c) the discharge was for the purpose of combating specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer.
- (a) acted with intent to cause damage; or
- (b) acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.