Supreme Court Rules 2000
937EOrder against judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor or third party
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 937E
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Rules 2000.
937E Order against judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor or third party
[Rule 937E of Part 36 Inserted by S.R. 2006, No. 72, Applied:19 Jul 2006]
(1) This rule applies if –
(a) judgment has been given in favour of an applicant by –
(i) the Court; or
(ii) in the case of a judgment to which subrule (2) applies, another court; or
(b) an applicant has a good arguable case on an accrued or prospective cause of action that is justiciable –
(i) in the Court or by a judge; or
(ii) in the case of a cause of action to which subrule (3) applies, in another court.
(2) This rule applies to a judgment if there is a sufficient prospect that the judgment will be registered in or enforced by the Court.
(3) This rule applies to a cause of action if –
(a) there is a sufficient prospect that the other court will give judgment in favour of the applicant; and
(b) there is a sufficient prospect that the judgment will be registered in or enforced by the Court.
(4) The Court or a judge may make a freezing order or an ancillary order, or both, against a judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor if the Court or judge is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances, that there is a danger that a judgment or prospective judgment will be wholly or partly unsatisfied because any of the following might occur:
(a) the judgment debtor, prospective judgment debtor or another person absconds;
(b) the assets of the judgment debtor, prospective judgment debtor or another person are –
(i) removed from Australia or from a place inside or outside Australia; or
(ii) disposed of, dealt with or diminished in value.