TASIn ForceRegulation
Supreme Court Rules 2000
937EOrder against judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor or third party
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 937E
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Rules 2000.
### 937E Order against judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor or third party
> [*\[Rule 937E of Part 36 Inserted by S.R. 2006, No. 72, Applied:19 Jul 2006\]*](/view/html/inforce/2006-07-19/sr-2006-072#GS5@EN)
>
> > (1) This rule applies if –
> >
> > > > (a) judgment has been given in favour of an applicant by –
> > > >
> > > > > > (i) the Court; or
> > > > >
> > > > > > (ii) in the case of a judgment to which [subrule (2)](#GS937E@Gs2@EN) applies, another court; or
> > >
> > > > (b) an applicant has a good arguable case on an accrued or prospective cause of action that is justiciable –
> > > >
> > > > > > (i) in the Court or by a judge; or
> > > > >
> > > > > > (ii) in the case of a cause of action to which [subrule (3)](#GS937E@Gs3@EN) applies, in another court.
>
> > (2) This rule applies to a judgment if there is a sufficient prospect that the judgment will be registered in or enforced by the Court.
>
> > (3) This rule applies to a cause of action if –
> >
> > > > (a) there is a sufficient prospect that the other court will give judgment in favour of the applicant; and
> > >
> > > > (b) there is a sufficient prospect that the judgment will be registered in or enforced by the Court.
>
> > (4) The Court or a judge may make a freezing order or an ancillary order, or both, against a judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor if the Court or judge is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances, that there is a danger that a judgment or prospective judgment will be wholly or partly unsatisfied because any of the following might occur:
> >
> > > > (a) the judgment debtor, prospective judgment debtor or another person absconds;
> > >
> > > > (b) the assets of the judgment debtor, prospective judgment debtor or another person are –
> > > >
> > > > > > (i) removed from Australia or from a place inside or outside Australia; or
> > > > >
> > > > > > (ii) disposed of, dealt with or diminished in value.
>
> > (5) The Court or a judge may make a freezing order or an ancillary order, or both, against a person other than a judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor (a "**third party**") if the Court or judge is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances, that –
> >
> > > > (a) there is a danger that a judgment or prospective judgment will be wholly or partly unsatisfied because –
> > > >
> > > > > > (i) the third party holds or is using, or has exercised or is exercising, a power of disposition over assets (including claims and expectancies) of the judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor; or
> > > > >
> > > > > > (ii) the third party is in possession of, or in a position of control or influence concerning, assets (including claims and expectancies) of the judgment debtor or prospective judgment debtor; or
> > >
> > > > (b) a process in the Court is or may ultimately be available to the applicant as a result of a judgment or prospective judgment, under which process the third party may be obliged to disgorge assets or contribute toward satisfying the judgment or prospective judgment.
>
> > (6) Nothing in this rule affects the power of the Court or a judge to make a freezing order or an ancillary order if the Court or judge considers it is in the interests of justice to do so.