TASIn ForceRegulation
Supreme Court Rules 2000
840Non-attendance or neglect of parties or practitioners
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 840
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Rules 2000.
### 840 Non-attendance or neglect of parties or practitioners
> > (1) [*\[Rule 840 Subrule (1) amended by S.R. 2008, No. 128, Applied:31 Dec 2008\]*](/view/html/inforce/2008-12-31/sr-2008-128#GS52@Hpa@EN) If, for any of the following reasons, a matter before the Court or a judge is adjourned or a hearing is unnecessarily prolonged, the Court or judge may order that the party, counsel or practitioner at fault pay any reasonable costs to another party:
> >
> > > > (a) [*\[Rule 840 Subrule (1) amended by S.R. 2008, No. 128, Applied:31 Dec 2008\]*](/view/html/inforce/2008-12-31/sr-2008-128#GS52@Hpb@EN) the non-attendance of a party or the counsel or practitioner for a party;
> > >
> > > > (b) the non-compliance by a party with any of these rules;
> > >
> > > > (c) [*\[Rule 840 Subrule (1) amended by S.R. 2008, No. 128, Applied:31 Dec 2008\]*](/view/html/inforce/2008-12-31/sr-2008-128#GS52@Hpc@EN) the neglect of a party or the counsel or practitioner for a party in not being properly prepared to conduct the proceeding.
>
> > (2) The party at fault under [subrule (1)](#GS840@Gs1@EN) is not allowed any costs in respect of the hearing.