Supreme Court Rules 2000
776BUndertaking for damages for wealth-restraining order wrongly granted
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 776B
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Rules 2000.
776B Undertaking for damages for wealth-restraining order wrongly granted
[Rule 776B Inserted by S.R. 2012, No. 90, Applied:17 Oct 2012] [Rule 776B Substituted by S.R. 2015, No. 91, Applied:16 Dec 2015] Unless otherwise ordered, a wealth-restraining order, or an interim wealth-restraining order, under Part 9 of the Crime (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1993 is to contain an undertaking by the State to pay any person directly adversely affected by the order any damages that –
(a) may be sustained by that person because of the order; and
(b) the Court, or a judge, thinks ought to be paid by the State.