TASIn ForceRegulation
Supreme Court Rules 2000
776BUndertaking for damages for wealth-restraining order wrongly granted
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 776B
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Rules 2000.
### 776B Undertaking for damages for wealth-restraining order wrongly granted
> [*\[Rule 776B Inserted by S.R. 2012, No. 90, Applied:17 Oct 2012\]*](/view/html/inforce/2012-10-17/sr-2012-090#GS16@EN) [*\[Rule 776B Substituted by S.R. 2015, No. 91, Applied:16 Dec 2015\]*](/view/html/inforce/2015-12-16/sr-2015-091#GS6@EN) Unless otherwise ordered, a wealth-restraining order, or an interim wealth-restraining order, under [Part 9 of the](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/act-1993-020#HP9@EN) [Crime (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1993](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/act-1993-020) is to contain an undertaking by the State to pay any person directly adversely affected by the order any damages that –
>
> > > (a) may be sustained by that person because of the order; and
> >
> > > (b) the Court, or a judge, thinks ought to be paid by the State.