ACTIn ForceAct
Supreme Court Act 1933
68CVerdict of judge in criminal proceedings
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 68C
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Act 1933.
68C Verdict of judge in criminal proceedings
(1) A judge who tries criminal proceedings without a jury may make any
finding that could have been made by a jury as to the guilt of the
accused person and any such finding has, for all purposes, the same
effect as a verdict of a jury.
(2) The judgment in criminal proceedings tried by a judge alone must
include the principles of law applied by the judge and the findings of
fact on which the judge relied.
(3) In criminal proceedings tried by a judge alone, if a territory law
requires a warning or direction to be given, or a comment to be made,
to a jury in the proceedings, the judge must take the warning, direction
or comment into account in considering his or her verdict.
Back-up and related offences Part 8
68CA Definitions––pt 8
back-up offence, in relation to an indictable offence (the first
indictable offence), means an offence––
(a) that is––
(i) a summary offence; or
(ii) an indictable offence that is capable of being dealt with
summarily by the Magistrates Court under the Magistrates
Court Act 1930, part 3.6 (Proceedings for offences
punishable summarily); and
(b) at least some of the elements of which are similar to the elements
that constitute the first indictable offence; and
(c) that is to be prosecuted on the same facts as the first indictable
related offence, in relation to an indictable offence (the first
indictable offence), means an offence, other than a back-up
offence—
(a) that is––
(i) a summary offence; or
(ii) an indictable offence that is capable of being dealt with
summarily by the Magistrates Court under the Magistrates
Court Act 1930, part 3.6 (Proceedings for offences
punishable summarily); and
(b) that arises from substantially the same circumstances as those
from which the first indictable offence has arisen.