The Act contains several specific drafting points and operational features that can create traps if overlooked. The following are concrete items to watch for, grounded in the Act text.
Stored water exclusion
- Stored water is explicitly not transferred to the Company under s 11(5). Practitioners and negotiators must therefore check whether water rights remain with a government party or are dealt with in separate agreements. Section 11(4) similarly excludes assets that are transferred to TransGrid by s 14 orders. Failure to note these carve-outs can lead to incorrect assumptions about asset scope.
No attornment and contractual protection
- Schedule 1 cl 4(3) removes the need for lessees to attorn to the transferee. Schedule 1 cl 4(1)-(2) also provides that vesting under the Schedule is not to be regarded as a breach or default of contract, nor does it give rise to remedies because of a change in ownership. That is a one-way protective mechanism favouring the transferee and the State. Counterparties should review contractual clauses that rely on assignment or change-of-control triggers because those triggers may be rendered inoperable by the Schedule.
Employee entitlements and limitation on transfer payments
- Section 15 takes employees into employment with the Company with continuity and equivalent accrued entitlements (s 15(1)-(2)). However s 15(3) states a transferred employee is not entitled to receive any payment or other benefit merely because he or she stopped being an employee of the Authority as a result of this section. Employers and unions must understand that statutory continuity exists but transitional claims premised solely on the mechanical transfer are not authorised.
Treasurer’s certificate is presumptively conclusive
- Section 20(3)-(5) gives the Treasurer power to certify exempt matters and creates conclusive evidence of that certification "except to the extent (if any) to which the contrary is proved." This creates an evidential hurdle for challengers. Challenges to tax-exemption determinations will need to overcome the statutory presumption and show contrary proof.
Parliamentary approval and disclosure timeline
- Section 6(2A) requires both Houses’ resolution to dispose of Victorian shares and s 6A(1) requires that a copy of any relevant document be laid before the House on the day notice of the resolution is given. The list of documents in s 6A(2) includes documents that may be commercially sensitive (for example constitution changes or water-flow agreements). The timing requirement may constrain negotiation confidentiality and timing of share disposals.
Corporations Act carve-outs and displacement
- Section 21 excludes specific matters from Chapter 2E and Part 2J.3 of the Corporations Act and s 21A declares s 6(2A) a displacement provision. Stakeholders accustomed to relying on related-party transaction protections and financial assistance provisions under the Corporations Act must check whether these carve-outs apply. The Act narrows some Corporations Act protections in relation to specified corporatisation items.
Termination of prior Snowy agreements and rights
- Section 28(1) terminates agreements set out in the First and Second Schedules to the Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric Agreements Act 1958 on the corporatisation date and extinguishes rights and obligations under them (s 28(2)). Section 28(4) expressly terminates any rights under those agreements to collect, divert, store, use or release water or to generate or supply electricity and states they are not transferred. Parties with historic rights under those agreements must not assume continuation post-corporatisation.
Limited penal regime in the Act
- The Act itself does not create a broad set of criminal or civil penalties; regulatory offences may be made under regulations (s 24(2)). Practitioners should note that enforcement of procedural requirements (for example, document-laying under s 6A or proper orders under ss 12 and 14) is primarily through administrative and parliamentary mechanisms rather than through express penalisation in the Act.
Reliance on intergovernmental agreements and orders
- Many transfer powers are conditional on agreements between the Commonwealth and States and on ministerial orders (ss 12, 14). Implementation therefore depends on parallel action by other jurisdictions and on intergovernmental negotiation, not solely on Victoria’s unilateral action. That can create timing and policy uncertainty.
Registrar amendment requires certificate and instrument delivery
- Section 22(1) requires the Registrar of Titles to amend the Register upon request and delivery of relevant certificate and instrument plus the certificate of the chief executive officer of the Company. Failure to secure the necessary documentary package may delay title changes.
Successor for private international law and exceptions
- Schedule 1 cl 9 takes Snowy Hydro Company to be the successor of the former Authority "for all purposes, including the rules of private international law," but expressly excludes assets and liabilities transferred to another body. This broad successor clause should be checked carefully when cross-border litigation or recognition issues arise.
These precise statutory features should be front-of-mind for counsel, negotiators and officials handling transactions, litigation or operational transition connected with the Snowy corporatisation programme.