Sentencing Act 1997
42BConviction not required for imposition of penalty
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 42B
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Sentencing Act 1997.
42B Conviction not required for imposition of penalty
[Section 42B Inserted by No. 2 of 2017, s. 7, Applied:31 Mar 2017]
(1) Despite any other enactment, if –
(a) a court has found a person guilty of an offence against a provision of an enactment; and
(b) the provision, or another provision of the enactment, (the relevant penalty provision) contains a statement to the effect that a fine may or must be imposed if a person is convicted of the offence –
the court may impose, in relation to the offence, a fine in accordance with the relevant penalty provision even though the court has not convicted the person of the offence.
(2) Despite any other enactment, if –
(a) a court has found a person guilty of an offence (a first offence) against a provision of an enactment; and
(b) a court, after a court has found the person guilty of the first offence, finds the person guilty of another offence (the further offence) against the provision; and
(c) the provision, or another provision of the enactment, (the penalty provision) contains a statement to the effect that a fine may or must be imposed in relation to such an offence against the provision if a person is convicted of the offence and has previously been convicted of such an offence or another offence –
the court may impose, in relation to the further offence, a fine in accordance with the penalty provision even though a court has not convicted the person of either the first offence or the further offence, or both.
(3) Nothing in this section is to be taken to authorise a court to impose, in relation to an offence committed by a person, a fine of an amount that is greater than the amount that could have been imposed if the person had been convicted of the offence.