sec.110Consideration of and decision on application for variation of accreditation

### sec.110 Consideration of and decision on application for variation of accreditation Subsection (2) applies if, immediately before the commencement— the chief executive and an applicant for the variation of an accreditation had agreed under the repealed Act, section 116(2)(c) the period within which the application was required to be decided; but the chief executive had not decided the application. For paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant period in the national law, section 69(3), the Regulator and the applicant are taken to have agreed the same period. Subsection (4) applies if, immediately before the commencement— the chief executive had given an applicant for the variation of an accreditation a notice under the repealed Act, section 116(2)(d) nominating the period within which the application was required to be decided; but the chief executive had not decided the application. For paragraph (c) of the definition of relevant period in the national law, section 69(3), the Regulator is taken to have specified the same period. A notice given by the chief executive to an applicant under the repealed Act, section 117 for the variation of an accreditation notifying the applicant of the chief executive’s decision on the application is taken to be a notice given by the Regulator to the applicant under the national law, section 69(1). (sec.110-ssec.1) Subsection (2) applies if, immediately before the commencement— the chief executive and an applicant for the variation of an accreditation had agreed under the repealed Act, section 116(2)(c) the period within which the application was required to be decided; but the chief executive had not decided the application. (sec.110-ssec.2) For paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant period in the national law, section 69(3), the Regulator and the applicant are taken to have agreed the same period. (sec.110-ssec.3) Subsection (4) applies if, immediately before the commencement— the chief executive had given an applicant for the variation of an accreditation a notice under the repealed Act, section 116(2)(d) nominating the period within which the application was required to be decided; but the chief executive had not decided the application. (sec.110-ssec.4) For paragraph (c) of the definition of relevant period in the national law, section 69(3), the Regulator is taken to have specified the same period. (sec.110-ssec.5) A notice given by the chief executive to an applicant under the repealed Act, section 117 for the variation of an accreditation notifying the applicant of the chief executive’s decision on the application is taken to be a notice given by the Regulator to the applicant under the national law, section 69(1). - (a) the chief executive and an applicant for the variation of an accreditation had agreed under the repealed Act, section 116(2)(c) the period within which the application was required to be decided; but - (b) the chief executive had not decided the application. - (a) the chief executive had given an applicant for the variation of an accreditation a notice under the repealed Act, section 116(2)(d) nominating the period within which the application was required to be decided; but - (b) the chief executive had not decided the application.