sec.103Suspension for non-payment of fee

### sec.103 Suspension for non-payment of fee Subsection (2) applies if— an accreditation was suspended under the repealed Act, section 109(2)(a) for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; and the suspension was in force immediately before the commencement. The suspension is taken to be a suspension of the accreditation by the Regulator under the national law, section 76(3a) for failure to pay the fee. Subsection (4) applies if, immediately before the commencement— the chief executive had given an accredited person a notice under the repealed Act, section 110(1)(a) stating that the chief executive was considering suspending the person’s accreditation for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; but the chief executive had not made a decision under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act in relation to the accreditation. The notice is taken to be a notice given by the Regulator to the person under the national law, section 76(3b) stating that the Regulator is considering suspending the accreditation for the failure. Subsection (6) applies if, immediately before the commencement— a person had made written representations under the repealed Act, section 110(1)(a)(ii) showing cause why the chief executive should not suspend the person’s accreditation under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; and the person had not withdrawn the representations; and the chief executive had not made a decision under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act in relation to the accreditation. The representations are taken to be written representations made by the person to the Regulator and must be considered by the Regulator before making a decision under the national law, section 76(3a) in relation to the accreditation. (sec.103-ssec.1) Subsection (2) applies if— an accreditation was suspended under the repealed Act, section 109(2)(a) for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; and the suspension was in force immediately before the commencement. (sec.103-ssec.2) The suspension is taken to be a suspension of the accreditation by the Regulator under the national law, section 76(3a) for failure to pay the fee. (sec.103-ssec.3) Subsection (4) applies if, immediately before the commencement— the chief executive had given an accredited person a notice under the repealed Act, section 110(1)(a) stating that the chief executive was considering suspending the person’s accreditation for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; but the chief executive had not made a decision under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act in relation to the accreditation. (sec.103-ssec.4) The notice is taken to be a notice given by the Regulator to the person under the national law, section 76(3b) stating that the Regulator is considering suspending the accreditation for the failure. (sec.103-ssec.5) Subsection (6) applies if, immediately before the commencement— a person had made written representations under the repealed Act, section 110(1)(a)(ii) showing cause why the chief executive should not suspend the person’s accreditation under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; and the person had not withdrawn the representations; and the chief executive had not made a decision under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act in relation to the accreditation. (sec.103-ssec.6) The representations are taken to be written representations made by the person to the Regulator and must be considered by the Regulator before making a decision under the national law, section 76(3a) in relation to the accreditation. - (a) an accreditation was suspended under the repealed Act, section 109(2)(a) for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; and - (b) the suspension was in force immediately before the commencement. - (a) the chief executive had given an accredited person a notice under the repealed Act, section 110(1)(a) stating that the chief executive was considering suspending the person’s accreditation for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; but - (b) the chief executive had not made a decision under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act in relation to the accreditation. - (a) a person had made written representations under the repealed Act, section 110(1)(a)(ii) showing cause why the chief executive should not suspend the person’s accreditation under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act for failure to pay an annual accreditation fee; and - (b) the person had not withdrawn the representations; and - (c) the chief executive had not made a decision under section 109 (2) (a) of that Act in relation to the accreditation.