sec.10Meaning of direct discrimination

### sec.10 Meaning of direct discrimination Direct discrimination on the basis of an attribute happens if a person treats, or proposes to treat, a person with an attribute less favourably than another person without the attribute is or would be treated in circumstances that are the same or not materially different. R refuses to rent a flat to C because— C is English and R doesn’t like English people C’s friend, B, is English and R doesn’t like English people R believes that English people are unreliable tenants. In each case, R discriminates against C, whether or not R’s belief about C’s or B’s nationality, or the characteristics of people of that nationality, is correct. It is not necessary that the person who discriminates considers the treatment is less favourable. The person’s motive for discriminating is irrelevant. R refuses to employ C, who is Chinese, not because R dislikes Chinese people, but because R knows that C would be treated badly by other staff, some of whom are prejudiced against Asian people. R’s conduct amounts to discrimination against C. If there are 2 or more reasons why a person treats, or proposes to treat, another person with an attribute less favourably, the person treats the other person less favourably on the basis of the attribute if the attribute is a substantial reason for the treatment. In determining whether a person treats, or proposes to treat a person with an impairment less favourably than another person is or would be treated in circumstances that are the same or not materially different, the fact that the person with the impairment may require special services or facilities is irrelevant. s 10 sub 2024 No. 47 s 7B (uncommenced amendment) (sec.10-ssec.1) Direct discrimination on the basis of an attribute happens if a person treats, or proposes to treat, a person with an attribute less favourably than another person without the attribute is or would be treated in circumstances that are the same or not materially different. R refuses to rent a flat to C because— C is English and R doesn’t like English people C’s friend, B, is English and R doesn’t like English people R believes that English people are unreliable tenants. In each case, R discriminates against C, whether or not R’s belief about C’s or B’s nationality, or the characteristics of people of that nationality, is correct. (sec.10-ssec.2) It is not necessary that the person who discriminates considers the treatment is less favourable. (sec.10-ssec.3) The person’s motive for discriminating is irrelevant. R refuses to employ C, who is Chinese, not because R dislikes Chinese people, but because R knows that C would be treated badly by other staff, some of whom are prejudiced against Asian people. R’s conduct amounts to discrimination against C. (sec.10-ssec.4) If there are 2 or more reasons why a person treats, or proposes to treat, another person with an attribute less favourably, the person treats the other person less favourably on the basis of the attribute if the attribute is a substantial reason for the treatment. (sec.10-ssec.5) In determining whether a person treats, or proposes to treat a person with an impairment less favourably than another person is or would be treated in circumstances that are the same or not materially different, the fact that the person with the impairment may require special services or facilities is irrelevant. - • C is English and R doesn’t like English people - • C’s friend, B, is English and R doesn’t like English people - • R believes that English people are unreliable tenants.