NSWIn ForceRegulation
Protection from Harmful Radiation Regulation 2025
74Continued exemption for certain medical registrars
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 74
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Protection from Harmful Radiation Regulation 2025.
#### 74 Continued exemption for certain medical registrars
74 Continued exemption for certain medical registrars
> > (1) A relevant medical registrar continues to be exempt from the requirement to hold a radiation user licence under former clause 10(1)(a) in relation to the use of regulated material in the course of the registrar’s training if the registrar complies with section 14(2).
>
> > (2) The exemption continues until the earlier of the following—
> >
> > > (a) the relevant day,
> >
> > > (b) the registrar is granted a radiation user licence.
>
> > (3) In this section—
> >
> > former clause 10(1)(a) means the [Protection from Harmful Radiation Regulation 2013](/view/html/repealed/current/sl-2013-0052), clause 10(1)(a), as in force immediately before its repeal.
> >
> > relevant day means the day that is 9 months after the day on which this section commences.
> >
> > relevant medical registrar means—
> >
> > > (a) a person who, immediately before the repeal of the [Protection from Harmful Radiation Regulation 2013](/view/html/repealed/current/sl-2013-0052)—
> > >
> > > > (i) was a medical registrar at a hospital, and
> > >
> > > > (ii) was training in a health profession that uses fluoroscopy, other than a health profession referred to in section 14(1), and
> > >
> > > > (iii) was exempt from the requirement to hold a radiation user licence under former clause 10(1)(a), and
> > >
> > > > (iv) did not hold a radiation user licence, or
> >
> > > (b) a person who—
> > >
> > > > (i) commences work as a medical registrar at a hospital on or after the commencement of this section, and
> > >
> > > > (ii) is training in a health profession that uses fluoroscopy, other than a health profession referred to in section 14(1), and
> > >
> > > > (iii) would have been exempt from the requirement to hold a radiation user licence under former clause 10(1)(a), and
> > >
> > > > (iv) does not hold a radiation user licence.