QLDIn ForceAct
Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000
sec.154AOrder after digital device has been seized
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.154A
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000.
### sec.154A Order after digital device has been seized
This section applies if—
a digital device is seized under a search warrant and removed from a place, and either—
the search warrant did not contain an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) ; or
the search warrant contained an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) but further access information is required for a police officer to gain access to device information from the device that may be relevant evidence; or
a digital device is otherwise lawfully seized under this Act, other than under section 176 (1) (j) , and removed from a place.
On the application of a police officer, a magistrate or a judge may make an order requiring a specified person to do a thing mentioned in section 154 (1) (b) or (c) .
An application made under subsection (2) —
may be made at any time after the digital device has been seized; and
must be made—
if the digital device was seized under a search warrant issued by a Supreme Court judge—to a Supreme Court judge; or
otherwise—to a magistrate.
An order made under subsection (2) must state—
the time at or by which the specified person must give a police officer the information or assistance mentioned in section 154 (1) (b) ; and
the place where the specified person must provide the information or assistance; and
any conditions to which the provision of the information or assistance is subject; and
that failure to comply with the order may be dealt with under the Criminal Code , section 205A .
A magistrate or a judge (the judicial officer ) may make an order under subsection (2) only if—
for a digital device seized under a search warrant issued by a magistrate or judge—the judicial officer is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that device information from the digital device may be relevant evidence; or
otherwise—the judicial officer is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that device information from the digital device may be evidence of—
a crime scene threshold offence; or
an offence against any of the following sections of the Criminal Code —
section 223
section 227A
section 227B .
s 154A ins 2016 No. 62 s 303
amd 2020 No. 7 s 31 ; 2022 No. 4 s 8
(sec.154A-ssec.1) This section applies if— a digital device is seized under a search warrant and removed from a place, and either— the search warrant did not contain an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) ; or the search warrant contained an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) but further access information is required for a police officer to gain access to device information from the device that may be relevant evidence; or a digital device is otherwise lawfully seized under this Act, other than under section 176 (1) (j) , and removed from a place.
(sec.154A-ssec.2) On the application of a police officer, a magistrate or a judge may make an order requiring a specified person to do a thing mentioned in section 154 (1) (b) or (c) .
(sec.154A-ssec.3) An application made under subsection (2) — may be made at any time after the digital device has been seized; and must be made— if the digital device was seized under a search warrant issued by a Supreme Court judge—to a Supreme Court judge; or otherwise—to a magistrate.
(sec.154A-ssec.4) An order made under subsection (2) must state— the time at or by which the specified person must give a police officer the information or assistance mentioned in section 154 (1) (b) ; and the place where the specified person must provide the information or assistance; and any conditions to which the provision of the information or assistance is subject; and that failure to comply with the order may be dealt with under the Criminal Code , section 205A .
(sec.154A-ssec.5) A magistrate or a judge (the judicial officer ) may make an order under subsection (2) only if— for a digital device seized under a search warrant issued by a magistrate or judge—the judicial officer is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that device information from the digital device may be relevant evidence; or otherwise—the judicial officer is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that device information from the digital device may be evidence of— a crime scene threshold offence; or an offence against any of the following sections of the Criminal Code — section 223 section 227A section 227B .
- (a) a digital device is seized under a search warrant and removed from a place, and either— (i) the search warrant did not contain an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) ; or (ii) the search warrant contained an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) but further access information is required for a police officer to gain access to device information from the device that may be relevant evidence; or
- (i) the search warrant did not contain an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) ; or
- (ii) the search warrant contained an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) but further access information is required for a police officer to gain access to device information from the device that may be relevant evidence; or
- (b) a digital device is otherwise lawfully seized under this Act, other than under section 176 (1) (j) , and removed from a place.
- (i) the search warrant did not contain an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) ; or
- (ii) the search warrant contained an order made under section 154 (1) or (2) but further access information is required for a police officer to gain access to device information from the device that may be relevant evidence; or
- (a) may be made at any time after the digital device has been seized; and
- (b) must be made— (i) if the digital device was seized under a search warrant issued by a Supreme Court judge—to a Supreme Court judge; or (ii) otherwise—to a magistrate.
- (i) if the digital device was seized under a search warrant issued by a Supreme Court judge—to a Supreme Court judge; or
- (ii) otherwise—to a magistrate.
- (i) if the digital device was seized under a search warrant issued by a Supreme Court judge—to a Supreme Court judge; or
- (ii) otherwise—to a magistrate.
- (a) the time at or by which the specified person must give a police officer the information or assistance mentioned in section 154 (1) (b) ; and
- (b) the place where the specified person must provide the information or assistance; and
- (c) any conditions to which the provision of the information or assistance is subject; and
- (d) that failure to comply with the order may be dealt with under the Criminal Code , section 205A .
- (a) for a digital device seized under a search warrant issued by a magistrate or judge—the judicial officer is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that device information from the digital device may be relevant evidence; or
- (b) otherwise—the judicial officer is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that device information from the digital device may be evidence of— (i) a crime scene threshold offence; or (ii) an offence against any of the following sections of the Criminal Code — • section 223 • section 227A • section 227B .
- (i) a crime scene threshold offence; or
- (ii) an offence against any of the following sections of the Criminal Code — • section 223 • section 227A • section 227B .
- • section 223
- • section 227A
- • section 227B .
- (i) a crime scene threshold offence; or
- (ii) an offence against any of the following sections of the Criminal Code — • section 223 • section 227A • section 227B .
- • section 223
- • section 227A
- • section 227B .
- • section 223
- • section 227A
- • section 227B .