QLDIn ForceAct
Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004
sec.679Notice by chief inspector
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.679
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004.
### sec.679 Notice by chief inspector
This section applies if the chief inspector reasonably believes a safety management system for an operating plant, or an aspect of the system—
does not comply with section 675 ; or
is insufficient to ensure an acceptable level of risk at the plant; or
must be revised under section 678 .
The chief inspector must give the operator of the plant notice (a validation notice )—
stating the belief, and the reasons for it; and
requiring the operator within a stated reasonable period to—
amend the system so that it complies with section 675 , or, if appropriate, revise the system under section 678 , and give the chief inspector notice that the system has been so amended or revised; or
lodge submissions as to why the system complies with the section.
The validation notice may state how the chief inspector considers the system should be amended.
The operator must comply with the validation notice.
Maximum penalty for subsection (4) —1,500 penalty units.
s 679 amd 2005 No. 68 s 150 sch ; 2007 No. 46 s 217 ; 2012 No. 20 s 281 sch 2 ; 2014 No. 64 s 256 sch 3
(sec.679-ssec.1) This section applies if the chief inspector reasonably believes a safety management system for an operating plant, or an aspect of the system— does not comply with section 675 ; or is insufficient to ensure an acceptable level of risk at the plant; or must be revised under section 678 .
(sec.679-ssec.2) The chief inspector must give the operator of the plant notice (a validation notice )— stating the belief, and the reasons for it; and requiring the operator within a stated reasonable period to— amend the system so that it complies with section 675 , or, if appropriate, revise the system under section 678 , and give the chief inspector notice that the system has been so amended or revised; or lodge submissions as to why the system complies with the section.
(sec.679-ssec.3) The validation notice may state how the chief inspector considers the system should be amended.
(sec.679-ssec.4) The operator must comply with the validation notice. Maximum penalty for subsection (4) —1,500 penalty units.
- (a) does not comply with section 675 ; or
- (b) is insufficient to ensure an acceptable level of risk at the plant; or
- (c) must be revised under section 678 .
- (a) stating the belief, and the reasons for it; and
- (b) requiring the operator within a stated reasonable period to— (i) amend the system so that it complies with section 675 , or, if appropriate, revise the system under section 678 , and give the chief inspector notice that the system has been so amended or revised; or (ii) lodge submissions as to why the system complies with the section.
- (i) amend the system so that it complies with section 675 , or, if appropriate, revise the system under section 678 , and give the chief inspector notice that the system has been so amended or revised; or
- (ii) lodge submissions as to why the system complies with the section.
- (i) amend the system so that it complies with section 675 , or, if appropriate, revise the system under section 678 , and give the chief inspector notice that the system has been so amended or revised; or
- (ii) lodge submissions as to why the system complies with the section.