NSWIn ForceRegulation
Passenger Transport (General) Regulation 2017
113Additional circumstances when samples may be required
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 113
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Passenger Transport (General) Regulation 2017.
#### 113 Additional circumstances when samples may be required
113 Additional circumstances when samples may be required
> > (1) A test supervisor may require a transport safety employee to provide a sample of the employee’s blood or urine if—
> >
> > > (a) the test supervisor is entitled under this Regulation to require the employee to submit to a breath analysis, and
> >
> > > (b) a breath analysing instrument is not readily available.
>
> > (2) A test supervisor may require a transport safety employee to provide a sample of the employee’s blood or urine if—
> >
> > > (a) the test supervisor has a reasonable belief that, by the way in which the employee acts, the employee may be under the influence of a drug, and
> >
> > > (b) the employee has undergone a breath test in accordance with this Regulation, and
> >
> > > (c) the result of the test does not permit the employee to be required to submit to a breath analysis, and
> >
> > > (d) the test supervisor has required the employee to submit to a sobriety assessment and—
> > >
> > > > (i) the employee refuses to submit to the assessment, or
> > >
> > > > (ii) after the assessment is made, the test supervisor has a reasonable belief that the employee is under the influence of a drug.
> >
> > Note—
> >
> > Under clause 108, a transport safety employee may be required at any time to provide urine samples.
>
> > (3) A requirement that a transport safety employee provide a sample is not open to challenge in proceedings on the basis that a breath analysing instrument was readily available.
>
> **cl 113:** Rep 2017 (595), Sch 1 \[41\]. Ins 2021 (483), Sch 1\[2\].