The Act directly affects three categories of actors identified in the statute and Schedule: (1) Aboriginal associations incorporated under the named incorporation Acts that hold qualifying land interests, (2) pastoral lessees and pastoral industry representatives where pastoral leases are implicated, and (3) the Territory and Commonwealth governments and their decision-makers, including the Minister who determines applications, the Special Tribunal members, and Land Councils.
Associations: Section 16(1) confines applicants to associations of Aboriginals incorporated under the Associations Incorporation Act or the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) which are the registered proprietors of fee simple estates under the Land Title Act, lessees under the Special Purposes Leases Act 1953, or Crown lessees under the Crown Lands Act 1992. Those incorporated organisations are the only private actors given a direct statutory right to apply for conversion (s 16(1)).
Pastoral lessees and the pastoral industry: The Schedule describes excisions from pastoral leases as the principal mechanism for creating living areas where the applicants have been resident on pastoral leases. The Memorandum’s eligibility criteria give priority to groups with the consent of the pastoral lessee, groups ordinarily resident since 1968, and other groups with historical residential association who can demonstrate current need. The Schedule also contemplates roles for pastoral industry representatives on the Special Tribunal and acknowledges that scheduling of stock routes should avoid unreasonable interference with pastoralists’ interests (Schedule, Memorandum; Attachment B).
Land Councils: The Schedule records that Territory legislation was to make provision for Land Councils to act on behalf of applicants when requested and that the Commonwealth Minister for Aboriginal Affairs will approve Land Councils to perform this function in accordance with s 23(2) of the Land Rights Act (Schedule).
Minister, Special Tribunal and courts: The Minister decides whether to accept or reject an application (s 16(3)). If the Minister declines, the Schedule contemplates referral to a Special Tribunal comprising a legal practitioner with ten years standing appointed by the Chief Justice of the NT Supreme Court, a Land Council representative, and a pastoral industry representative (Schedule, Attachment B). The Minister may reject the Tribunal’s recommendation but must give written reasons and the Schedule provides for appeal to the NT Supreme Court, with the Minister bound by the Court where the decision is manifestly wrong or there is an error of law (Schedule, Attachment B).
Mining and resource interests: The Schedule’s Attachments indicate the parties’ intention to reserve living areas from mineral exploration and mining and to amend the Mining Act and Petroleum Act to provide exclusion zones and compensation for disturbance (Schedule, Attachment A). Those measures, if enacted in Territory statute, would affect mineral explorers and miners by limiting or conditioning activity near living areas.
Other government entities and service providers: The Memorandum contemplates that the proposed living-area freehold titles will be subject to reservations permitting compulsory acquisition for certain agreed purposes or for essential services such as power, water, sewerage, road or communications to or across the land (Schedule; Attachment A). That creates a limited role for public authorities and utilities when providing infrastructure.
Indirectly affected groups include neighbouring landowners, resource companies, and parties with encumbrances or covenants on the land, because s 16(4) conditions conversion on discharge of charges, rates, rent and encumbrances and on the keeping of covenants. The Gazette notice mechanism (s 16(4)) also produces acquisition-like consequences under the Lands Acquisition Act, potentially affecting third-party rights.
In sum, the statutory regime is targeted: it primarily empowers incorporated Aboriginal associations holding specific land interests, while setting out a process that involves pastoralists, Land Councils, a Ministerial decision-maker, a tripartite Special Tribunal and the courts, and anticipates constraints on mining and acquisition subject to statutory implementation in Territory law.