QLDIn ForceAct
Mining and Quarrying Safety and Health Act 1999
sec.178Obstructing inspectors, officers or district workers’ representatives
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.178
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Mining and Quarrying Safety and Health Act 1999.
### sec.178 Obstructing inspectors, officers or district workers’ representatives
A person must not obstruct an inspector, inspection officer, authorised officer or district workers’ representative in the exercise of a power, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—500 penalty units.
If a person has obstructed an inspector, inspection officer, authorised officer or district workers’ representative and the inspector, officer or representative decides to proceed with the exercise of the power, the inspector, officer or representative must warn the person that—
it is an offence to obstruct the inspector, officer or representative, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and
the inspector, officer or representative considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.
s 178 amd 2007 No. 46 s 123 ; 2024 No. 34 s 193
(sec.178-ssec.1) A person must not obstruct an inspector, inspection officer, authorised officer or district workers’ representative in the exercise of a power, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—500 penalty units.
(sec.178-ssec.2) If a person has obstructed an inspector, inspection officer, authorised officer or district workers’ representative and the inspector, officer or representative decides to proceed with the exercise of the power, the inspector, officer or representative must warn the person that— it is an offence to obstruct the inspector, officer or representative, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and the inspector, officer or representative considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.
- (a) it is an offence to obstruct the inspector, officer or representative, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and
- (b) the inspector, officer or representative considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.