CTHRepealedAct
Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2012
140‑10 Treatment of pre‑mining profits—g140‑10 Treatment of pre‑mining profits—general rule
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 140‑10 Treatment of pre‑mining profits—g
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2012.
#### 140‑10 Treatment of pre‑mining profits—general rule
(1) The \*entity may be liable, under this section, to pay MRRT, for the \*MRRT year, in relation to the \*pre‑mining profit.
(2) For the purpose only of working out the amount (if any) of that MRRT, the \*MRRT law has effect as if:
(a) the \*pre‑mining project interest were, in the \*MRRT year and any earlier MRRT years, a mining project interest that the \*entity has; and
(b) the \*pre‑mining profit were a \*mining profit for that mining project interest for the MRRT year; and
(c) subsection 70‑20(1) is taken to be satisfied for the purpose of determining whether a \*pre‑mining loss can be applied in working out a \*pre‑mining loss allowance for that mining project interest for the MRRT year or any earlier MRRT year; and
(d) no \*mining loss or \*starting base loss arises, or has arisen for that mining project interest for the MRRT year or any earlier MRRT year; and
(e) that mining project interest were not \*integrated with any other mining project interest; and
(f) the \*exploration right to which the pre‑mining project interest relates were a \*production right; and
(g) in a case where the entity is not a miner—the entity were, in the MRRT year and any earlier MRRT years, a miner.
> Note 1: The following MRRT allowances could be available for the pre‑mining project interest:
(a) royalty allowances;
(b) pre‑mining loss allowances (but not for the current year, because the pre‑mining profit precludes a pre‑mining loss for the current MRRT year);
(c) transferred pre‑mining loss allowances;
(d) transferred mining loss allowances.
> Note 2: Paragraph (2)(e) precludes the entity from having any transferred royalty allowances, and also precludes the pre‑mining project interest from being treated as combined with any mining project interest.
> Note: Example: An entity holds a pre‑mining project interest that, in the 2015‑16 MRRT year has a pre‑mining profit of $50 million. It also has a royalty credit for the MRRT year of $5 million, based on royalties paid for resources the entity sold. The entity also holds another pre‑mining project interest that, in the MRRT year has a pre‑mining loss of $20 million.
> Note: The pre‑mining profit is taken to be a mining profit of $50 million, but the entity has a royalty allowance of $5 million and a transferred pre‑mining loss allowance of $20 million. Under section 10‑5, the entity’s MRRT liability is:
> Note: 
> Note: However, the amount the entity must pay is reduced to zero by the low profit offset under section 45‑5.