CTHRepealedAct
Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
164Advising person who referred allegation or information about the outcome of the investigation
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 164
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.
#### 164 Advising person who referred allegation or information about the outcome of the investigation
(1) If a person:
(a) refers an allegation, or information, that raises an ACLEI corruption issue under section 154; and
(b) elects under section 155 to be kept informed of the action taken in relation to the ACLEI corruption issue and has not revoked the election;
the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who referred the allegation or information of the outcome of the investigation of the ACLEI corruption issue.
(2) However, the Integrity Commissioner need not advise the person if the Integrity Commissioner is satisfied that doing so is likely to prejudice:
(a) the investigation of the ACLEI corruption issue or another corruption investigation; or
(b) any action taken as a result of an investigation referred to in paragraph (a).
(3) If the Integrity Commissioner advises the person who referred the allegation or information that raises the ACLEI corruption issue, the Integrity Commissioner may do so by giving the person a copy of the whole or a part of the report prepared in relation to the investigation under subsection 162(1).
(4) The Integrity Commissioner:
(a) must not disclose section 149 certified information to the person if the disclosure of the information to the person would be contravene the certificate issued under section 149; and
(b) may exclude information from the advice if the Integrity Commissioner is satisfied that:
(i) the information is sensitive information; and
(ii) it is desirable in the circumstances to exclude the information from the advice.
(5) In deciding whether to exclude information from the advice under paragraph (4)(b), the Integrity Commissioner must seek to achieve an appropriate balance between:
(a) the person’s interest in having the information included in the advice; and
(b) the prejudicial consequences that might result from including the information in the advice.