The Act is explicitly cross‑referenced to several other statutory instruments and regimes, creating dependencies and delegated governance pathways. First, the Legislation Act underpins definitions and instrument rules. The dictionary uses terms from the Legislation Act and signposts that definitions apply across the Act (s 3, dictionary notes). Disallowable and notifiable instrument treatment of program approvals, determinations, guidelines and forms places these instruments within the procedural architecture of the Legislation Act for disallowance and notification.
The Official Visitor Act 2012 governs the functions of official visitors and the Act’s part 4B defines who is an entitled person and what counts as a visitable place for the Official Visitor Act, while imposing notice rules and exceptions (pt 4B, s 25V, s 25W). That means official visiting powers, complaint handling and reporting are exercised under the OV Act subject to the additional definitions and notice requirements in this Act.
The Act links to the Community Housing Providers National Law (ACT) through part 4A. Registered community housing providers are defined by reference to the Community Housing Providers National Law (ACT) and the Act enables the housing commissioner and other Territory entities to provide assistance to registered providers (s 25A, s 25B). That cross‑reference embeds community housing providers within a national regulatory framework while allowing local assistance arrangements and reporting obligations under s 25C.
Residential tenancy law is invoked. Section 22(3) references the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 for a prescribed amount that limits how large a rent increase may be at one time when bringing rents up to market. Section 33(2)(ii) notes that the Recovery of Lands Act 1929 provides for actions the Territory may take for land but does not apply to leases under the Residential Tenancies Act 1997. These cross‑references mean that rent increase procedures, tenant protections and eviction processes under tenancy law remain relevant when the commissioner adjusts rents or exercises land recovery powers.
The Act interacts with the Planning Act 2023. The Executive may direct the Territory planning authority to place unleased Territory land under the housing commissioner’s control (s 32). The Act includes a note referencing the Planning Act 2023 s 382 for recovery of land from a former lessee (s 33 note). That creates a statutory mechanism for using planning land management processes to transfer control to housing administration, and it situates housing land management within the broader planning regime.
Financial management is tied to the Financial Management Act 1996. Section 36 requires that all amounts paid to or by the housing commissioner be handled through directorate or territory banking accounts within the meaning of the Financial Management Act 1996. This subjects housing financial flows to Territory accounting and audit frameworks set out in financial management law.
Administrative review is handled through the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008. The Act makes reviewable certain decisions and mandates review rights to ACAT; the housing commissioner must take reasonable steps to give reviewable decision notices to affected parties in accordance with ACAT Act requirements (s 31B, s 31C, and the note referencing ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 s 67A). This interaction sets ACAT as the dispute resolution venue for listed reviewable decisions.
The Freedom of Information Act 2016 appears in the amendment history and endnotes as having modified the Act’s treatment of documents containing protected information, but the main text defines “protected information” and prescribes that the housing commissioner must provide protected information to the Minister upon the Minister’s request (s 28, s 35). The interaction between the Act’s protections and FOI regimes will be determined by how FOI exemptions and obligations apply to documents held by the commissioner. Finally, the Recovery of Lands Act 1929 is referenced for powers the commissioner may exercise on behalf of the Territory for land placed under control (s 33(2)(ii)), though it is noted that that Act does not apply to Residential Tenancies Act leases.
These cross‑references mean that the housing commissioner’s actions will be shaped by multiple legal frameworks, and compliance requires attention to program instrument formality, tenancy law, planning law, national community housing regulation, financial management and administrative law review processes.