sec.722Approved intelligent transport system

### sec.722 Approved intelligent transport system An approved intelligent transport system, including all the equipment and software that makes up the system, is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have operated properly on any particular occasion. Without limiting subsection (1) , information generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted and reported by an approved intelligent transport system is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been correctly generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted and reported by the system. Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , information generated by an approved intelligent transport system is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, not to have been changed by being recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system. If in a proceeding it is established by contrary evidence that particular information recorded or stored by an approved intelligent transport system is not a correct representation of the information generated by the system, the presumption mentioned in subsection (3) continues to apply to the remaining information recorded or stored by the system despite that contrary evidence. If a defendant in a proceeding for an offence against this Law intends to challenge any of the following matters, the defendant must give the complainant notice of the intention to challenge— that an approved intelligent transport system has operated properly; that information generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by an approved intelligent transport system has been correctly generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system; that information generated by an approved intelligent transport system has not been changed by being recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system. The notice must— be signed by the defendant; and state the grounds on which the defendant intends to rely to challenge a matter mentioned in subsection (5) (a) , (b) or (c) ; and be given at least 14 days before the day fixed for the hearing of the charge. This section does not limit section 714 . sch s 722 ins 2013 No. 4 s 12 (sec.722-ssec.1) An approved intelligent transport system, including all the equipment and software that makes up the system, is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have operated properly on any particular occasion. (sec.722-ssec.2) Without limiting subsection (1) , information generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted and reported by an approved intelligent transport system is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been correctly generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted and reported by the system. (sec.722-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , information generated by an approved intelligent transport system is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, not to have been changed by being recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system. (sec.722-ssec.4) If in a proceeding it is established by contrary evidence that particular information recorded or stored by an approved intelligent transport system is not a correct representation of the information generated by the system, the presumption mentioned in subsection (3) continues to apply to the remaining information recorded or stored by the system despite that contrary evidence. (sec.722-ssec.5) If a defendant in a proceeding for an offence against this Law intends to challenge any of the following matters, the defendant must give the complainant notice of the intention to challenge— that an approved intelligent transport system has operated properly; that information generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by an approved intelligent transport system has been correctly generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system; that information generated by an approved intelligent transport system has not been changed by being recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system. (sec.722-ssec.6) The notice must— be signed by the defendant; and state the grounds on which the defendant intends to rely to challenge a matter mentioned in subsection (5) (a) , (b) or (c) ; and be given at least 14 days before the day fixed for the hearing of the charge. (sec.722-ssec.7) This section does not limit section 714 . - (a) that an approved intelligent transport system has operated properly; - (b) that information generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by an approved intelligent transport system has been correctly generated, recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system; - (c) that information generated by an approved intelligent transport system has not been changed by being recorded, stored, displayed, analysed, transmitted or reported by the system. - (a) be signed by the defendant; and - (b) state the grounds on which the defendant intends to rely to challenge a matter mentioned in subsection (5) (a) , (b) or (c) ; and - (c) be given at least 14 days before the day fixed for the hearing of the charge.