ACTIn ForceAct
Guardianship and Management of Property Act 1991
4Principles to be followed by decision-makers
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 4
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Guardianship and Management of Property Act 1991.
4 Principles to be followed by decision-makers
(1) This section applies to the exercise by a person (the decision-maker)
of a function under this Act in relation to a person with impaired
decision-making ability (the protected person).
(2) The decision-making principles to be followed by the
decision-maker are the following:
(a) the decision-maker must provide or facilitate, as far as
practicable, support necessary for the protected person to
understand the decision to be made, participate in decision-
making and communicate their wishes;
(b) the protected person’s wishes, as far as they can be worked out,
must be given effect to, unless making the decision in
accordance with the wishes is likely to significantly adversely
affect the protected person’s interests;
(c) if giving effect to the protected person’s wishes is likely to
significantly adversely affect the person’s interests—the
decision-maker must give effect to the protected person’s wishes
as far as possible without significantly adversely affecting the
protected person’s interests;
(d) if the protected person’s wishes cannot be worked out or given
effect to at all—the interests of the protected person must be
promoted;
(e) the protected person’s life (including the person’s lifestyle) must
be interfered with to the smallest extent necessary;
(f) the protected person must be encouraged to look after himself or
herself as far as possible;
(g) the protected person must be encouraged to live in the general
community, and take part in community activities, as far as
possible.
(3) Before making a decision, the decision-maker must consult with each
carer of the protected person.
(4) However, the decision-maker must not consult with a carer if the
consultation would, in the decision-maker’s opinion, adversely affect
the protected person’s interests.
(5) Subsection (3) does not limit the consultation that the decision-maker
may carry out.