ACTIn ForceAct
Guardianship and Management of Property Act 1991
10Considerations affecting appointment
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 10
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Guardianship and Management of Property Act 1991.
10 Considerations affecting appointment
(1) A person must not be appointed as a guardian or manager unless the
person consents in writing to the appointment.
(2) A person (except the public trustee and guardian or a trustee
company) must not be appointed as a guardian or manager unless the
person is an adult and has informed the ACAT whether the person—
(a) has been convicted or found guilty of an offence involving
violence, fraud or dishonesty; or
(b) has been, either in the ACT or elsewhere, refused appointment
as a guardian or manager, or removed from office as a guardian
or manager; or
(c) is bankrupt or personally insolvent (and, if so, has given
particulars to the ACAT).
Note Bankrupt or personally insolvent—see the Legislation Act,
dictionary, pt 1.
(3) For subsection (2), a person may inform the ACAT on oath or by
statutory declaration.
(4) Someone (other than the public trustee and guardian) may be
appointed as a guardian or manager only if the ACAT is satisfied that
the person will follow the decision-making principles and is
otherwise suitable for appointment.
(5) For subsection (4), the matters the ACAT must take into account
include—
(a) the views and wishes of the person (the protected person) for
whom a guardian or manager is to be appointed; and
(b) the desirability of preserving existing relationships with family
and any other carers; and
(c) whether the proposed guardian or manager is compatible with
the protected person; and
(d) whether the proposed guardian or manager lives in the ACT; and
(e) whether the proposed guardian or manager will be available and
accessible to the protected person; and
(f) the nature of the functions to be exercised under the order and
whether the proposed guardian or manager is competent to
exercise them; and
(g) whether the interests and duties of the proposed guardian or
manager are likely to conflict with the protected person’s
interests to the detriment of the protected person’s interests.
(6) The interests and duties of the domestic partner or a relative of a
person must not be taken to be likely to conflict with the interests of
the person only because of the fact of being the domestic partner or
relative.