ACTIn ForceAct
Evidence Act 2011
104Further protections—cross-examination as to credibility
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 104
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Evidence Act 2011.
104 Further protections—cross-examination as to credibility
(1) This section applies only to credibility evidence in a criminal
proceeding and applies in addition to section 103.
(2) A defendant must not be cross-examined about a matter that is
relevant to the assessment of the defendant’s credibility, unless the
court gives leave.
(3) Despite subsection (2), leave is not required for cross-examination by
the prosecutor about whether the defendant—
(a) is biased or has a motive to be untruthful; or
(b) is, or was, unable to be aware of or recall matters to which the
defendant’s evidence relates; or
(c) has made a prior inconsistent statement.
(4) The prosecutor must not be given leave under subsection (2) unless
evidence presented by the defendant has been admitted that—
(a) tends to prove that a witness called by the prosecutor has a
tendency to be untruthful; and
(b) is relevant solely or mainly to the witness’s credibility.
(5) A reference in subsection (4) to evidence does not include a reference
to evidence of conduct in relation to—
(a) the events in relation to which the defendant is being prosecuted;
or
(b) the investigation of the offence for which the defendant is being
prosecuted.
(6) Leave must not be given for cross-examination by another defendant
unless—
(a) the evidence that the defendant to be cross-examined has given
includes evidence adverse to the defendant seeking leave to
cross-examine; and
(b) that evidence has been admitted.